What is strrrng's type?

[Ezra]

Discuss.

[Creepy-bg]

straight up gangsta

[Expat]

Discuss.

Probably indeed IEI.

Unless you agree, in which case I will argue against it.

[Creepy-Cyclops]

I see no reason to doubt his self typing.

[Joy]

Beta

[Mea]

Probably indeed IEI.

Unless you agree, in which case I will argue against it.

[implied]

Probably indeed IEI.

Unless you agree, in which case I will argue against it.

from what i can tell so far, i agree. kinda like krae. i don't have any really sufficient evidence for it yet, though.

[JRiddy]

Creative and not SEI. That's all I can say.

[theMime.]

Probably indeed IEI.

Unless you agree, in which case I will argue against it.

[Steve]

No reason against Ni INFp - he is like Krae in a lot of ways.

[strrrng]

I've considered a good number of types, but what always leads me back to INFp is: irrational, Se-valuing, rly good with Ni...lol

[strrrng]

You're the same type as me??

haha, indeed.

[aestrivex]

already discussed this with those people that care. no further comments.

[JRiddy]

haha, indeed.

already discussed this with those people that care. no further comments.

Haha. Base and brevity. <3 forever.

[strrrng]

The 6s I've known have more of an "affiliative" core. They're looking for approval, connection to a group. They define themselves in terms of group or "nongroup" connection. Either the faithful, dutiful one or the rebel. And often, because all 6s are both phobic and counterphobic, vacillate between both states occasionally.

Ezra, this is EXACTLY why I am NOT a 6.

[Ezra]

I've considered a good number of types, but what always leads me back to INFp is: irrational, Se-valuing, rly good with Ni...lol

Why do you think you are "really good with Ni"? (Irrational and Se-valuing are evident to me; there's no reason to doubt them.)

Ezra, this is EXACTLY why I am NOT a 6.

Right, okay.

[JRiddy]

Why do you think you are "really good with Ni"? (Irrational and Se-valuing are evident to me; there's no reason to doubt them.)

All being "really good" at Ni means is to suck at and value Se very strongly. So basically it means bending over.

[implied]

all being really good at Ne means is getting hit by a streetcar.

[Creepy-Cyclops]

already discussed this with those people that care. no further comments.

Um..

[JRiddy]

all being really good at Ne means is getting hit by a streetcar.

That's how I stay alive...by sucking at Ne.

[Elro]

all being really good at Ne means is getting hit by a streetcar.

A streetcar named DESIRE, baby, yeaah

[strrrng]

Why do you think you are "really good with Ni"? (Irrational and Se-valuing are evident to me; there's no reason to doubt them.)

because of the way I conceptualize things...I am just able to pick up on subtle dynamics that help me tie together a picture of anything in my head. (please don't tell me to explain more, blah blah, this isn't Ni bullshit, I'm a Ni-gga to tha end!)

Right, okay.

was this meant to be sarcastic?

[strrrng]

I guess I have a slight difficulty of seeing INFp, but then again I don't know you.

I guess I could see that. I think my Ni is most apparent in intellectual discussion. Maybe Gilly could shed some light on this.