Last edited by Joy; 04-24-2008 at 10:49 AM.
Limited time only, btw.
Last edited by Joy; 04-24-2008 at 10:55 AM.
huh i saw Fe first.
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
INTj is a serious possibility, actually. But I wouldn't rule out every other type yet.
LIE is quite unlikely.
I was thinking LSI > SLE > ILE > LII.
something says Fe.
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
It's unlikely that he's got a Se PoLR.
Beta popped into my head, he seems to be comfortable with , at least.
I'm thinking ISTj.
This is me and my dual being scientific together
I don't rule out that for certain, but can't you see that his lower part of the face suggest N, at least on the picture where he smiles. In the other picture his face looks more square in that area in a way that is more compatible with ISTj, but it is still not a typical ISTj face. INTj is still more likely based on V.I. We need more information to back up your ISTj thesis, because it can't stand on its own here.Originally Posted by Kamangir
Reminded me immediately of a guy I had typed as either LIE or LSI, with LII as a remote possibility.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Anyways, he's the guy who phaedrus reminds me a lot of.
Now, the important question is: How do we learn people to see the difference(s) between LIIs and ILIs, between leading types and creative types? Why is that so difficult? I don't know the answer to that, but it is very obvious that this is a general tendency among certain members of this forum.
It's extremely unlikely that this guy is LII. I've lived with people with Se PoLR's almost my entire life, and he does not have one.
LSI, most likely.
Last edited by Joy; 04-24-2008 at 02:27 PM.
That is, not all LSI's look the same.