Rashida Jones
she seems really scattered, I saw a pic of her apt and it was not, filthy or messy but just scattered. She studied religion and philosophy at Harvard. She said she was dumped a lot in college.
I'd thought she was INFj before but now I'm thinking she might be INTj. What do you think is her type? Yes, she does remind me of myself.
here's her former (hot) fiance DJ and producer Mark Ronson
looks to be some xnxp or isfp
coolOriginally Posted by ScarlettLux
i think the "got dumped a lot in college" pretty much seals it as LII
if the female LII doesn't get paired by the end of college its over
she looks like ESI
I hope you're kidding...
Retired from posting and drawing Social Security. E-mail or PM to contact.
I pity your souls
like in a lot of humor there is a grain of truth
Rashida Jones
guesses? I like her.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I like her too. I think she's Ne-INFj.
VIs as IEI. Reminds me of a few I know.
You are right poli, and you're getting really good at VI
She is INFp.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
FYI, poli, the filatova portraits on socionics.org have a lot of quasi mistypings among them. Not saying she's not IEI though... I'm not totally sure, those pics could go either way. None of those pics show rashida jones smiling, and i recall on a pic where she's smiling she looks very much like an EII friend of mine.VIs as IEI. Reminds me of a few I know.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
tea leoni
I also like her...any guesses?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
hard to tell from that pic. Here she looks Fi-valuing.I also like her...any guesses?
But maritsa, if you want to make a thread on Tea Leoni, just make a separate one, dont derail this one.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
how do you know? personally i think they're a good reference (based on my own experience), but i'm not going to proclaim one way or another how correct or not they are, because i have no real way to "verify" the typings - none of us do.
As far as VI, you can get a pretty good impression of the type VI from each of those 12 filatova pics collectively. Using a couple photo examples of Rashida is more for showing the resemblance off than getting the larger picture, so I think she looks very much like IEIs even though these ones aren't smiling much. I also have more filatova pics from her book, but not online, and you can use the expressions of famous people she's typed.
Link me which ones you're talking about.
Definite Gamma rational.I also like her...any guesses?
Double check VI and tell me which one: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...59&postcount=4
this is my thread
I can derail it as much as I want. I can take it for a cruise and hope I end up in Hawaii where I can get a really nice tan and great coconut drink.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
well i remember looking through the SLI, IEE, and LIE ones with ashton and we thought a bunch of them VI'd more like the respective quasis.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
well true maritsa, i apologize. I totally didn't notice you were the OP.
Yeah then, derail away!
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I agree with Tea Leoni as Te-ESTj. She's kinda like a more mannish version of Kelly Ripa.
Galen, I agree with you for Tae Leoni's type; she does seem to be a J type perhaps LSE. She's definitely a J from this picture of her
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
faye dunaway
I should have called this thread "Maritsa's favorite actors" LOL
Try her now.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I have to point out that Ashton was the one who said LSE first. Just so we give credit appropriately where credit is due.
I said Fi-valuing too, so technically Maritsa, you're agreeing with all of us, not just Galen.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I'm sorry. Thanks for pointing it out.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Except I thought ESTj before I saw Ashton's post?
Anyways, Faye Dunaway. Hmm, some Ej.
She looks like an NF
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Rashida Jones - INFP
There is somewhere in Universe Filatova's collection of photos with _several photos for every (at least for some) man_ in her gallery. About 7 years ago I tried to get digitized variant of it from her and Lytov (they both had it), but she was against it (probably because of books having part of these photos). In any case, to have just 3-4 photos is not enough for sure opinion about type in most cases (video is much better way to type). The truth is that many (>50%) people on her photos in books give doubts about correctness of their types, and according to general low match of typing among typers - the situation is not surprising.
I know.
I was talking wrt in this thread.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I'm sorry. Thanks for pointing it out.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Bump
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
