??
Helen Mirren
??
Last edited by Rubicon; 06-11-2010 at 04:00 PM.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
INFj
What information from the video gives it away for you?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Last edited by Rubicon; 06-11-2010 at 11:26 PM. Reason: ridiculous content
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Yeah, it's that clear understanding so that proper communication take place thing. Silverchris wrote about this extensively...so did RYU at one point.Originally Posted by Rubicon
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/628934-post83.html
Se PoLR looking down and away from the interviewer a lot kinda gives this away.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-11-2010 at 04:37 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yeah, I edited my post though :-p .. To me, it's like she understands but wants Parkinson to state things explicity for the sake of it regardless.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
I like her Si. ESFj makes the most sense, Fe/Ti really sticks out. They look like they're in a cave.
yes.
First thing that struck me was Fe ego and E3, probably sx/so variant. I can see resemblance to an ESE-Si I knew in high school, although she was a 2.
I doubt all ESEs are extremely outgoing or bubbly.
Somehow I just knew that was coming...
Do you know what Merry/Serious is about? It's not about two quadras being giddy and emotional and the other two being subdued, but rather whether or not the quadra and its members are sensitive to the particular emotional states of an atmosphere, or the emotional tenor of interaction between people. Serious quadras regard emotions as something to be deprioritized in favor of clarity in communication, whereas Merry quadras are attentive to emotional nuances and seek to inhabit, govern, and influence them as a primary subjective source of fulfillment.
Funny, she reminds me of Lady Gaga. She's not quite as childish and irksome, though; she seems more mature.
Removed at User Request
lol awesome.. I deleted my previous comments because I started to think she was my type
She seems all Alpha Fe in this interview imo:
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Removed at User Request
Mm yeah.. compared to Shirley Bassey, I see what you mean. The things Helen says in her early interviews seem rather intuitivey though imo.. but you never know with Fe-creatives. We speak a lot of rubbish/adopt and discard various philosophies easily I think. :redface:I'll watch this, I watched some where she's older and at the first glance I'd have said ESE (so when she's older), but there are many-many details against that IMO, including the fact that she's unplanned and without an opinion about the future, she swears, she mocked this title of "Dame" blah-blah. ESEs say crazy things from time to time, but overall (at least the ones I know) they use to stick to some behavioural rules especially as a public person.
Then there's this thing: ESE's believe in something and they're convinced that they're on the good way, they have an attitude of sufficiency and use to advise people what's good and what was good in what they did, tell advices, talk about optimism, goals, ideals & stuff - I'm thinking about 25-30+. Maybe this is one of the great differences, ESEs are optimistic but for SEIs life just goes on, as far as an observer can tell.
So overall, ESEs are more pushy, opinionated, dramatic - well watch Shirley Bassey for a standard. (who says that she is not an ESE will die by my hands). Not saying that all ESEs are that coquettish - I know a "type" with a more natural look, still not totally natural (by my standards, I suppose).
Anyway, there's this similarity, that strikes me, between her and some SEIs I know, in gestures, gaze, faces. They are the kind I know as the Fe subtype.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
a Ni type.
Helen Mirren - ENFP - Huxley
ILI
ESE. Ethical Sensory, at the very least. Not Fi.
EIE>IEE>ESE maybe.
An atheist and a naturist, used to take cocaine when she was younger, not very political. Overall shows she's quite open-minded. I don't think she's know for being disagreeable.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
