Constantly (and consciously/naturally) guarding yourself and your possessions, as well as the people you care about. Protecting what's yours and what belongs to you. Encouraging people to do the same.
Constantly (and consciously/naturally) guarding yourself and your possessions, as well as the people you care about. Protecting what's yours and what belongs to you. Encouraging people to do the same.
Last edited by Park; 04-04-2008 at 05:27 AM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
i see it related to se.
people with strong se and se in a vulnerable spot can freak out about territory and hoard things for themselves as well as loved ones, ime with ISTj, ISFj. ESFp. I dont have direct experience with an ESTp doing that.
Does this explain why my SLE roomie gets into my food but my SLI roomie doesn't?
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
Creative Se I think does it most.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
Sounds related to the resource protection dichotomy.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Enneagram instinctual variant - self preservation dominant.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
wtf is it with all these banal threads trying to associate traits with functions? what you have described would be called LOYALTY. But I guarantee some people will say it's Se and Fi because you're focusing on your "territory" and the "bonds" between you and others. however, that is not true. Se is focusing on observable, unchanging properties of objects and Fi is focusing on the subjective, unchanging connections between objects (which does not = relationships).Originally Posted by Winterpark
and neither implies a specific function...Originally Posted by FDG
functions are how you do things, not what you do.
.
Fi focuses on subjective, unchanging ties between fields. this does not imply that they have strong bonds with others. It is an abstract way of processing information. It's the way that they want a relationship, i.e., an Fi person will want to feel some sort of certainty about where they stand with others because the function is static.Originally Posted by Diana
4w3-5w6-8w7
.
very true. It's just that people shouldn't mistake the word "fields" for the words "bonds," "ties," etc., that are used in the interpersonal context.Originally Posted by Diana
4w3-5w6-8w7