They have to do with the
HA in the context of trying to get something done and knowing how to do it.
So, suppose the SEE suddenly realizes that something had to be done (like, fixing something, organizing something, etc) but is not done yet, and goes , "wtf nothing is happening!, especially if it was the LIE, ESI or ILI who were supposed to do it (since the SEE doesn't really now how, not very well)/
The SEE goes "hey why you guys haven't done it yet? There is no time to waste! Don't be so lazy! Don't you realize it's important? Get moving! You promised you could do it, so why don't you do it. I could have done it much more quickly. I don't think I should have believed any of you could do it! But it's so easy!" And bla-bla-bla etc etc.
The
HA is in the "I could have done it, it's so easy, etc".
Reactions:
LIE: the LIE knows that (1) it wasn't so easy, (2) it couldn't have been done it more quickly and (3) certainly not by the SEE, so the LIE thinks "why all this nonsense? Is it something personal?! Is it a personal attack? But -- why? What is going on here?"
concerns.
ESI: the ESI does not think it's something personal, so the ESI thinks "could the SEE be right? Maybe I can't do it well enough? Well if the SEE knows how to do it, why not give some help rather than expect me to do everthing?"
concerns.
ILI: the ILI understands everything: "no the SEE couldn't do it better or faster, and the SEE is not attacking me personally; just impatient and anxious that it's not happening yet. Maybe I should indeed do one or two things a bit faster". A bit of
reaction.
The
HA is in the argument "I know better and I could have done it better". The LIE and the ILI don't buy it; the ESI find it unfair since it's the dual-seeking, so the reaction is to be upset and "well if so why didn't you do it or offer to help?".