I think it's about time to discuss UDP's type. The poll is there for archival reasons; I'm interested in getting a general consensus on whether or not he is an LSE at this time.
Personally, I'm beginning to accept it, despite the barrier of opposition he received last year as he changed from LII to LSE. Thus far, despite his highly questionable methods of reasoning, I've seen nothing that plays contrary to LSE.
I'm interested to see detailed cases for or against LSE (or another type, particularly LII) from those who are interested in UDP's case. Those who aren't, speak by all means; doesn't mean you'll be acknowledged though. But do vote; everyone's vote counts here, and I like big numbers for big issues. Even if you're not willing to contribute a case for a type, still vote.
ETA: apologies, UDP. Fucking forum rules don't allow all caps for your name.