View Poll Results: Machintruc's Myersian preferences

Voters
6. You may not vote on this poll
  • E

    4 66.67%
  • I

    4 66.67%
  • S

    3 50.00%
  • N

    6 100.00%
  • T

    4 66.67%
  • F

    4 66.67%
  • J

    5 83.33%
  • P

    4 66.67%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: machintruc's myers-briggs dichotomies

  1. #1
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default machintruc's myers-briggs dichotomies

    What Myersian preferences do I have according to you !?

    DO NOT check contradictory answers. I won't take them into account.

  2. #2
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can only see N instead of S.

    ETA: I guess J instead of P as well.
    Last edited by Expat; 03-24-2008 at 05:36 PM.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  3. #3
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's strange. I ran into Myers Briggs first of course. I found it didn't make sense. I thought it was all a lot of vague stuff that didn't quite work. I of course hadn't done some thorough study of it (I didn't think it would be worth the time). Then I ran into Socionics. At first my interpretations of Socionics were distorted by MB influence and I was aware of this, but wasn't sure what form the distortion was taking. Now the "distortion" is growing increasingly absent to the point that it's starting to go away entirely. And when I think about MB typology now it seems like total nonsense. So I don't really know how to evaluate things according to it anymore.

    All I can say is if you answer the questions on one of the MB-based online tests so it works with the following pattern:

    - more sociable and outgoing and attention seeking than not
    - more organized, structure-philic, orderful than not
    - more logical than emotional and less likely to factor emotions into decision making, and not too interested in consoling others or pondering your feelings for hours
    - more focused on the abstract than the concrete, more interested in ideas than practical application of them, less focused on the "here and now," interested in theory, insights, psychic premonitions (lol)

    Then you'll get ENTJ.

    (ETA) And maybe even cute little percentages, like

    55% E; 45% I
    80% N; 20% S
    90% T; 10% F
    65% J; 35% P

  4. #4
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    It's strange. I ran into Myers Briggs first of course. I found it didn't make sense. I thought it was all a lot of vague stuff that didn't quite work. I of course hadn't done some thorough study of it (I didn't think it would be worth the time). Then I ran into Socionics. At first my interpretations of Socionics were distorted by MB influence and I was aware of this, but wasn't sure what form the distortion was taking. Now the "distortion" is growing increasingly absent to the point that it's starting to go away entirely. And when I think about MB typology now it seems like total nonsense. So I don't really know how to evaluate things according to it anymore.

    All I can say is if you answer the questions on one of the MB-based online tests so it works with the following pattern:

    - more sociable and outgoing and attention seeking than not
    - more organized, structure-philic, orderful than not
    - more logical than emotional and less likely to factor emotions into decision making, and not too interested in consoling others or pondering your feelings for hours
    - more focused on the abstract than the concrete, more interested in ideas than practical application of them, less focused on the "here and now," interested in theory, insights, psychic premonitions (lol)

    Then you'll get ENTJ.

    (ETA) And maybe even cute little percentages, like

    55% E; 45% I
    80% N; 20% S
    90% T; 10% F
    65% J; 35% P
    http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-p...mbti-types.asp

    ENTJ

    Frank, decisive, assume leadership readily. Black or White Logic

    Quickly see illogical and inefficient procedures and policies, Black or White Logic

    develop and implement comprehensive systems to solve organizational problems. Minus White Logic

    Enjoy long-term planning and goal setting. Result

    Usually well informed, well read, ???

    enjoy expanding their knowledge and passing it on to others. Black Intuition

    Forceful in presenting their ideas. Black Intuition


    Actually, Myersian ENTJ is correlated to socionic LII :

    ENTJ has a frequency of 1.8%.

    Intimate Fives have a frequency of 1/27

    According to the law of E/I distribution in Phitypes, 50% of Intimate Fives are Introtims. They're almost only LII's.

    1 / 27 / 2 = 0.0185

    Coincidence ?

    It's like ESTJ's and ISTJ's : most ESTJ's are LSI's, whereas most ISTJ's are LSE's.

  5. #5
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @glamourama : how am I an INFP !??

  6. #6
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    no longer seem to agree with myself...
    Last edited by inumbra; 03-25-2008 at 03:50 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •