Socioninfo type test - hidden agenda + suggestive function

[Angel von Himmel]

I think I found out how to find a type regardless of the hidden agenda and suggestive function in a way that may not give you guys headaches. The reason I was having problems detecting this before is because I did not realize that there an actually two reversed left/right pattern that specific people follow and that is what mucked up the results previously. Hopefully, this should have fixed that.

Basically the types in the blue boxes are all identical, mirror, beneficiary, and illusionary types. A person's type should be one of the beneficiary/benefector conbination in one of the blue boxes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sycophant
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...716868238.html
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...230116743.html

rmcnew
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...324649090.html
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...587040716.html

Joy
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...800989229.html

Herzblut
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...408567926.html

Rocky
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...289958216.html

Baby
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...960462332.html

Nicky
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...488302610.html

Cone
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...157270009.html

Taz
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...579552267.html

MysticSonic
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...581187356.html

Mercutio
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...113232087.html

Steventj
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...929106874.html

MySaviour
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...252475457.html

Mother
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/html/resu...248211840.html

[Gilly]

mcnew, I know you're into this stuff, and I think it's pretty cool too, and I thank you for coming up with this cool shit.

But why?

[Angel von Himmel]

mcnew, I know you're into this stuff, and I think it's pretty cool too, and I thank you for coming up with this cool shit.

But why?

why not?

[Gilly]

Gee, I dunno, maybe because there's an outside world?

[Cone]

If it weren't for analytic philosophers, debating and working about the most useless stuff, you wouldn't have a computer with which to complain.

[Catholic Schoolboy]

Gee, I guess I'm ISTj.

[Angel von Himmel]

Gee, I guess I'm ISTj.

Either or, it is sort of like how people are saying I am not an ENTp and proposing other types, like ENFj or INFp ...

Other than that, an ISTj would not broadcast that much ...

[Catholic Schoolboy]

Do I put out a lot of Te eh? I really don't see myself as being very ISTj like. What about you McNew? Am I ISTjish?

[Gilly]

You're not ISTJ. I would've killed you by now.

[implied]

[Expat]

Do I put out a lot of Te eh? I really don't see myself as being very ISTj like. What about you McNew? Am I ISTjish?

There's nothing ISTj about you.

[Gilly]

I didn't quite get the wording you used rmcnew...you're type should be either the benefactor or beneficiary of one of the types in blue? Is that it?

[Angel von Himmel]

I didn't quite get the wording you used rmcnew...you're type should be either the benefactor or beneficiary of one of the types in blue? Is that it?

A person can look like either their beneficiary or their benefactor; however, a person is more likely to think that they are their illusionary of beneficiary than they are to think they are their benefactors type. It just depends, but more than likely beneficiary.

If you go by socionics.com Ganin is under the impression that people can only think they are their illusionary or atleast that is what it appears he believes. I think he is being a little too strick by inferring that that is the only option.

[Rocky]

If it weren't for analytic philosophers, debating and working about the most useless stuff, you wouldn't have a computer with which to complain.

God bless INTjs.

(even though I couldn't imagine doing that kind of stuff myself).