Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 63 of 63

Thread: ENTp/ILE subtypes

  1. #41
    <something> Wynch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a Hill
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    3,911
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I find Ne-sub to be more socially outgoing but more intellectually reserved (note: this means less aggressive in the defense of their ideas, not stupid or illogical) while Ti-sub is more socially reserved but more intellectually outgoing. I think this matches what I've said about emphasis on Fe vs. Si in ILE sub-types as well as what has been expressed by all of the descriptions on the wiki.

    Quote Originally Posted by ephemeros
    well guys, of course i know about the subtype theory, but ARE YOU SURE the 2 ego functions make the difference? why? the only approach to a Ti i see for the Logical subtype would be a kind of "holding back" but is this actually tied to Ti only? for me, one subtype resembles a bit to Si or Fi (named intuitive subtype), the other would look more Te or Fe rather than Ti (named logical subtype).

    besides, how can you explain the Ti-inclined subtype is more social, relaxed in society, talkative, etc.? this is in no case a Ti threat! all this subtypes theory has a good observation but a bad explanation.
    I blatantly disagree with the bolded statements. In fact, I think the opposite is true and presents itself in the descriptions you're using from the wiki, in practical theory, and in observed trends in the sub-typed ILEs here. Ti-subs seem to resemble Si-subs and valuers while Ne-subs seem to resemble Fe-subs and valuers. I mean the people who identify with Ne sub-type like JRiddy and Allie often present and act in a more Fe-oriented fashion. They participate a lot in the general tom-foolery of fun and animated discussion and seem to stop and consider before jumping into any of the more serious discussions, waiting until they have a very valid point to make and contribute. They're much more easily drawn into the "Fe" atmosphere. Ti sub-types like myself and Steve participate in the "Fe", but I find that we both usually hold back until we have something particularly witty to say. While Steve is certainly more reserved than myself, it's been brought up that both of us have a more relaxed and grounded quality about us in the social setting then Allie or Riddy who almost always have something fun and quirky to add. Wile observing these things on the forum and on stickam, I've noticed that these qualities are a lot like those of Luis or Jessica (Si-ISTp), who tend to hold back on stickam and seem to be a little more self-serving in conversation. Certainly I find myself more concerned with my sense of personal harmony, than the atmosphere of the group. Heck, I often participate in the riling of a rhetorical argument, ruin the F environment, then hypocritically decide that I'm done with it and that the discussion is over because I don't like it anymore and feel it's pointless.

    In anycase, I disagree with you entirely here. I don't think Ti is more "social". I think the opposite is true. I think you're reading too much into "Their seemingly shy demeanour combines with coolness and obstinacy when they begin to defend their point of view." from the wikisocion, which I feel refers to the process of intellectual discussion and not to sociability.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    The first kind is like JRiddy or hkkmr. They use Ti in a more obvious way than the other kind (NO, not because they are Ti subtype; fuck subtypes for now). They like to have their systematic views etc. all worked out, and will often express these to others. What differentiates them from the LII is that they are quite clearly EP, regardless of how their Ti is expressed.

    The second kind is like Allie, Sunshine Lively and maybe Suomea. They're much more playful than the first kind, and can't really be bothered coming up with systematised views. Nonetheless, what makes them ILE is the way their mind works. They enjoy the Alpha atmosphere, and their Fi PoLR is normally quite clear (probably more clear than the first kind).
    Wow, Riddy is intensely Ne when you talk to him on Stickam, I have no idea where this idea of yours is coming from. Yes, certainly he has his ideas set out wrt socionics, but I think this has more to do with experience and the taking in of ideas than of any kind of active rearranging and application of theory for himself. Sure, he has opinions on things (so do Allie, SL and Suomea, if you pay attention and talk to them about them), but he doesn't seem to actively pursue the exploration and dissemination of these ideas. I don't think ideas and theories are his ultimate goal, I think he uses Ti to defend his Ne perspective.

    Then, with Sunshine_Lively, I've never actually spoken with her personally, but her participation in the playful alpha atmosphere is usually low-key. If anything, I think you're more likely to see her commenting on the more intellectually-oriented discussions than in the playfulness. And when she does choose to comment, she's usually more reserved about it. A little more serious and with some definite opinions of her own.

    Also, I think you're failing to take into account other factors like age, maturity, experience, areas of interest etc.
    ILE
    7w8 so/sp

    Very busy with work. Only kind of around.

  2. #42
    <something> Wynch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    On a Hill
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    3,911
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ephemeros View Post
    please stop, you're very wrong. THE WIKI WRITES EXACTLY THE REVERSE!!! i don't want to ignore you just because of a such foolish matter, otherwise you seem to understand the things clearly enough .
    on the wiki the descriptions is shown that the Ne subtype is more reserved, cautious but more aggressive in defending his ideas and uncompromising - while the Ti is more ambitious, inpatient, confident and socially outgoing but more prone to make compromises for his plans to go on. no offence, until we clear this up we have nothing to argue about this topic.
    one more thing, i think playfulness has nothing to do with any of the ILE subtypes. both can be playful at times and serious and busy about their interests. the Ti subtype is focused on business - the Ne is focused on doctrine but both do only what they are interested in. this is what i call selectivity and don't believe is influenced by the ILE's ego functions.
    First: The wiki is not the oracle of all wisdom on socionics. Most of it is written by people like you and me who are merely expressing their interpretations of translations from russian sources.

    Second: You are selectively choosing which of the descriptions you feel suits your understanding best, it appears. I think it's important to consider the theory and practical evidence more than one description on a wiki.

    Third: There is nothing in the descriptions you favour that speaks of out-goingness or reservation. Certainly there seems to be evidence of your selective vs. non-selective theory there, though I think I would rename those categories as decisive vs. considering. From there, if you think of Ti as decisive and Ne as considering (which you seem to do) you can see the relationship between those and IJ vs. EP temperaments. Ti will lean towards IJ temperament while Ne will lean even more strongly towards EP temperament.
    ILE
    7w8 so/sp

    Very busy with work. Only kind of around.

  3. #43
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,728
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think subtype theory is splitting hairs anyway. there's tons of variation within type that can't be accounted for by using socionics theory.

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  4. #44
    Landlord of the Dog and Duck Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    EII-Ne Sp/So
    Posts
    14,275
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    One interesting subtype theory I heard:

    being less dominant in the forground implies an increase in the use of as an element. being less dominant implies greater use of .

    Since a Ti-subtype restricts his use of Ne in favour of Ti, this necessiates greater activity in his use of Se. Since an Ne-subtype presumably restricts his use of Ti in favour of Ne, then this necessiates greater activity in his use of Fi.
    What exactly do you mean by use? Perhaps it could be like this:

    Ti subtype - greater activity in his use of SuperEgo block Se
    Ne subtype - greater activity in his use of SuperEgo block Fi

    i.e. maybe a Ti subtype individual becomes more averse to Se?

  5. #45
    EllaC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    160
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default ILE (Ti) and ILE (Ne)

    Are Ti's more boring than the latter? I swear they seem less excitable and happy! What other differences are there?
    ENTp... love it

    3w2

  6. #46
    I had words here once, but I didn't feed them Khola's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    3,536
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not in the bedroom! No, Ti = more awesome. More tolerant of my constant prodding and whining about random stuff while force-feeding cups of tea from my experiences..
    Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .



  7. #47
    kalinoche's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oymyakon
    Posts
    2,683
    Mentioned
    130 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    gilly and discjoe were funny and endearing back then.
    "...Generally, by the time you are Real, most of your hair has been loved off, and your eyes drop out and you get loose in the joints and very shabby. But these things don't matter at all, because once you are Real you can't be ugly" (the Skin Horse)

  8. #48

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    556
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think if you don't get too caught up in the inert/contact stuff and just view vertical subtypes as stemming from the basic Jungian oppositions, one way to tell the difference is that Ne-subtype should be the one you much less likely could mistake for a logic base, and may appear more like an ethical type, to the point where you sort of have to decide between the two kinds of ethics. The two "contact" subtypes are ones that sort of straddle the lines.
    Basically with say LII, you trace the course of cognition and see how much does someone seem to proceed from a logic/thinking standard of inquiry purely, where intuition simply underscores the kinds of contents they are working with rather than truly speaking to the nature of their process. (Note - I'm trying to do this for myself so not claiming it's all straightforward, but I'm finding it useful)

    Side note, I wonder what Gulenko's subtype is.

  9. #49

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    556
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Now I think about it, another comment: in subtypes, strengthening happens in pairs. However, in practice, this doesn't mean that both pairs will show the strength equally - the strengthening occurs on the potential level, not the practical. If your ethics potential is strengthened, and you exhibit a marked Fe over Fi preference, then you will tend to show a similar disposition towards Fi-POLR that the Ti-subtype does. However it'll be Fe, not Ti, blocking Fi.

    Now that I think about it though, this effect where one thing strengthens and the other is left totally bereft might just be more applicable to the lower level information elements. While I'm sure a Ti-LII might not exactly be thrilled when Te comes about as the main perspective, I think simply the fact of the matter that no complete cognitive process is wholly introverted or extraverted might lead them to roll with the little Te needed in an automatic way when they continue with their Ti thought activity. I've been thinking Kant must be a Ti-subtype. I think perhaps the way it works is if you truly suppress Te that much, the principle that some level of extraverting must happen despite predominance of introversion is carried by the intuitive function. In other words, when one must acknowledge connections inherent to objects, however much one's cognitive aims always move back to something rational and introverted, one must do so intuitively rather than through the attitude of technical implementation of a program. The way to say this might be that the thinking subtype remains ignoring of Te, but it occurs automatically, whereas the intuitive subtype might more directly experience the frustrations inherent to the unpreferred side of thinking, because they aren't entirely logical/categorical in judgment. Just so many ways everything interplays and affects everything else.
    Last edited by chemical; 09-10-2014 at 09:41 PM.

  10. #50
    Soupman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Grand Britain
    TIM
    Dyslexic 17
    Posts
    324
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    By the way, you are only a T subtype when your preference is ''terminal'', ie you enjoy finishing all your projects. You are ''initial'' if and only if you are someone that is constantly open to new projects

  11. #51
    SlavaPHP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    TIM
    ENTP / INTj
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default subtype

    I noticed that ENTP n subtype organizes concepts while t subtype explains what his n absorbed

  12. #52
    Dionysius's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    According to Gulenko, Logical subtype goes to parties and is very business oriented, while it's not that common for Intuitive subtype.

    ILE-Ne is a fucked up type: impractical, naive and more socially awkward. Ti sub is more active and "ESTp"-like.

    "Because of his innate impracticality and gullibility, he can be easily fooled." (Intuitive subtype, Meged and Ovcharov)

    ILE-Ne has an abnormal body, clothes don't fit well, often with stocky built.
    ILE-Ti is more normal in his bodily structure.

    Ne sub is also more prudent and diplomatic (Si/Fi enforced)
    Ti sub is often hot-tempered and audacious. (Se/Fe enforced)

    Basically Ne subtype is what Meged calls as "floating in the clouds, childishly naive", totally abstract and crazy. His thoughts are somewhat disorganized.
    Ti sub is more adapted to real life: "Projects an impression of a serious person". His thoughts are way more organized.
    Last edited by Dionysius; 11-17-2014 at 07:55 PM.

  13. #53
    Dionysius's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chemical View Post
    Side note, I wonder what Gulenko's subtype is.
    I've seen one time a page with socionist's types which listed Gulenko as LII-Ne.

  14. #54

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    556
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Viktor - happen to have the link?

  15. #55

  16. #56

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    556
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Viktor - any idea whose typings those are: Dmitriy Lytov commonly goes by ILE and is listed as LII there, so probably isn't his typings

  17. #57
    Dionysius's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @chemical

    I don't have any idea of the author, but the couple indeed seems ILE-Ti (his wife) and LII-Ne (Dmitriy):

    lytov.jpg

  18. #58

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    556
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fair enough; my understanding is Lytov does tend to have a slightly different take on typing than other socionists on some matters, i.e. to be understood for his own viewpoint rather than taking as mainstream or discarded either.

  19. #59
    Avalonia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Virgo Supercluster
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've met many other Russian socionists who currently have differing opinions on the subtype theory.

    Some people like it, others use it as if it were a pure theory with no practical base at all, and even some socionists refuse to regard it's existence.

    Whether or not you believe it is "heresy" it provides a valid understanding on why people of the same type still have different external and internal behavioral patterns.

    The ILE type is quite capable of using their to the point of desiring to express themselves and fascinate others with their knowledge of new and unusual phenomena of how the external world works, while at the same time using their as a cold and rational substitution of to categorize, research, and perfect their ideas to the point of stemming the innovation of the creation of new technological processes.

    The subtype is focused on the creation of ideas and theories, without them needing to be complete for his or the satisfaction of others.
    The subtype is focused on the depth of ideas and theories, increasing and mobilizing their capacity for quality and development of the overall main idea or question that it relates to.

  20. #60
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,847
    Mentioned
    300 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chemical View Post
    Side note, I wonder what Gulenko's subtype is.
    His would be the Ne subtype. Reading his articles I've noticed that he tends to gallop through the conceptual space without carefully treating each subject and explaining what he means in all detail (which has a side effect of complicating the translations). Such strong associative ability in place of a more analytical approach is indicative of heightened intuition.

  21. #61
    Dionysius's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The answer for the main difference between subtypes is in Meged's subtype theory, which is fundamentally based on the dichotomies Internal x External, and Involved x Abstract.

    In ENTp Ne-subtypes, Ne sub is Internal (NF), and Ti sub is External (ST). Their different filters of reality produce very different perspectives/worldviews, as well as different attitudes toward the world and people.

    Ne subtype see the world in a much more colorful and idealistic way. Has a broader perspective, but with less focus and depth. Strenghtened imagination (Ni), alongside with romantic beliefs about politics and societal ethics often causes a naive faith about humanity and people. They might believe that people are good (Fi) and could live in a harmonious (Ne) society. Karl Marx is probably an ILE-Ne subtype.

    Ti subtype is more skeptical about people and ethics, and has a narrower focus. Often deeply immersed in analysis, with attention to details (Si). Stronger Se and Te give them a more grounded, realistic sense of reality. Gives less importance to broader societal problems, as his main concern are his own things: work, research, art, etc. Einstein is a classic example of an ILE-Ti subtype.

    Both subtypes can be charismatic or anti-social, although friendliness and sociability comes much easier to Ne subtype, while Ti subtype more likely will show a serious, darker vibe. However, Fe Hidden Agenda is relatively strong, so it can be used whenever ILEs want.

    With regards to professional pursuits, Ti subtype generally has a clearer inclination towards business Te and wealth Se. Some may engage in sports taking good care of their bodies - Se. Main focus generally are science and business, although when not well-developed in Logic, might express themselves through art.

    Ne is more likely to be a lazy hobo, accepting of a simple life, if just it's fulfilled of good emotions Fe and someone providing comfort Si to them. (I have 2 ILE Ne subtype friends: one dates an SLI for more than 3 years, another dated an SEI for years, and now dates an LSI. All types with 4D-Si. Both are not very ambitious and just seek to enjoy life.)
    Last edited by Dionysius; 01-07-2017 at 04:28 AM.

  22. #62
    Poster Nutbag chips and underwear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne, 6w5 sp/so
    Posts
    3,959
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soupman View Post
    By the way, you are only a T subtype when your preference is ''terminal'', ie you enjoy finishing all your projects. You are ''initial'' if and only if you are someone that is constantly open to new projects
    Supposedly I'm an "initial" subtype but I relate to both of these statements. I'm always open to new projects and like starting them AND I want to finish what I start. I don't like having loose ends.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dionysius View Post
    I've seen one time a page with socionist's types which listed Gulenko as LII-Ne.
    Also Creative subtype in DCNH. Although lately, he's gotten a bit too creative with the theory.





  23. #63

    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    TIM
    ILE-Ti 7w6 714 sx/sp
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The subtypes are simple.NeTi

    FiSe

    FeSi

    NiTe

    Ne-sub has stronger inert IMEs, whereas Ti-sub has stronger contact IMEs.

    So ILE-Ne is more similar to IEE-Ne (and so Delta), whereas ILE-Ti is more like SLE-Ti (and so Beta)/
    7wcp6-1w2-4w5
    sx/sp
    ENTP ILE-Ti-C

    Any posts that suggest a type that is not my current one are wrong.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •