-

[Dee]

-

[tcaudilllg]

haha, gotcha!

not necessarily but possibly. no Ne polrs allowed. yet. maybe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_analysis



well Aushra did the same thing but to create model A. now that simply means that, since TA apparently works (just scan the article), it well might be the case that we actually have four "types" in us. maybe each defined by the goal and means function in the spirit of creative and program.

e.g. an ENFP, in the hypothesis, would have "ENFP" ego (NeFi), "ESTP" superego (SeTi), "ISTP" superid and "INFP" id.

discuss.

I like how you think these eternal -Ti truths are malleable.

[krieger]

If you say that an ENFp is also ESTp, ISTp and INFp on different levels you're just redefining "type", cause you could refer to all those four types and their configuration with the label "ENFp" again. There'd still be 16 configurations, and with that 16 labels. It's just the letters and symbols playing tricks on your eyes.

[Cuddly McFluffles]

My understanding is that "type" refers to a set order of the 8 functions. Therefore, the combination itself yields the type. Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying, Dee? My brain is kinda fuzzy. We're out of regular coffee at my place. *needs caffeine*

[Cuddly McFluffles]

have you guys read the firsts posts here?

No. *looks around* I don't think I'm in the condition to do so just now. *goes back to writing*

[Cuddly McFluffles]

Oh. I thought the one I saw was the original post.

[Cuddly McFluffles]

*shrugs*

[Cuddly McFluffles]

why?

I shrugged because I don't see the matter (of which post I saw) as worth pursuing.