Last edited by Dee; 02-26-2009 at 02:00 AM.
If you say that an ENFp is also ESTp, ISTp and INFp on different levels you're just redefining "type", cause you could refer to all those four types and their configuration with the label "ENFp" again. There'd still be 16 configurations, and with that 16 labels. It's just the letters and symbols playing tricks on your eyes.
My understanding is that "type" refers to a set order of the 8 functions. Therefore, the combination itself yields the type. Or am I misunderstanding what you're saying, Dee? My brain is kinda fuzzy. We're out of regular coffee at my place. *needs caffeine*