Types of Inanimate Objects

[machintruc]

Not so long ago, I asserted that computer software was typable.

Bukalov said that inanimate objects are typable, and I agree with him.


For example :

Alarm clock : LSI
Personal Computer : LSI
Car : LSE
Cellphone : LIE
Pen : LSE
Paper : SLI
Tape Recorder : EII
TV : SEI

[Cuddly McFluffles]

*looks, blinks* What?

[xyz]

I don't see the point of typing inanimate objects, considering that there's no information exchange taking place.

[Cuddly McFluffles]

I'm convinced you two (LV and Herzy) are gonna drive me nuts.

[xyz]

I'm convinced you two (LV and Herzy) are gonna drive me nuts.

In a good way?!

[machintruc]

you all drive me fucking nuts.

[xyz]

you all drive me fucking nuts.

That's because you have none! Ohh!

[Cuddly McFluffles]

you all drive me fucking nuts.

*agrees without the expletive* No, not in a good way, guys. I see the avatar and immediately think LV's double-posting. Then it turns out to be not what I thought, and...urggh. *can't stand that*

You know, if you're gonna go there, one of you should be a Luigi cookie.

[machintruc]

That's because you have none! Ohh!

you don't either, retard !

[marooned]

The woes of Ti ego.

[machintruc]

I don't see the point of typing inanimate objects, considering that there's no information exchange taking place.

The fact is that there is, because you exchange information with such objects.

Augusta said that reality was sending her information on reality, not only on human beings.

I don't see the point of typing inanimate objects, considering that there's no information exchange taking place.

- 0.5 (instead of -1) because this post is not really yours.

[Rick]

Not so long ago, I asserted that computer software was typable.

Bukalov said that inanimate objects are typable, and I agree with him.


For example :

Alarm clock : LSI
Personal Computer : LSI
Car : LSE
Cellphone : LIE
Pen : LSE
Paper : SLI
Tape Recorder : EII
TV : SEI

Funny, I scoffed at this stuff years ago, but now I do see some worth in it. Only that the explanation isn't really correct (i.e. "inanimate objects are typable"). They can't have types because they are inanimate. But interaction with certain objects may stimulate the use of certain functions, and that's what this list is really about -- not the types of objects.