Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: For those who think I'm LSI

  1. #1
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default For those who think I'm LSI

    What makes you think I'm LSI ? I don't understand. I started this thread to make you post things that suggest I may or may not be LII or LSI, or another type.

    Besides, I don't think I'm "physical" and "maximalistic" enough to be LSI. Even for being the E1 variant.

    I'm pretty sure I'm LII because I verified the whole pattern. My is producing, but weak, because when I try to act -like, it's mostly unaccurate and unnatural.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    you are extremely narrow minded. one of the extremely obvious features of LSIs is that they are narrow minded. LIIs are also narrow minded, but not as much as LSIs. LSIs are more narrow minded than LIIs. you are too narrow minded to be an LII. in fact, you're so narrow minded that you wont understand this post. therefore you are LSI.

  3. #3
    I'm back, assholes! Herzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    5,098
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    you are extremely narrow minded. one of the extremely obvious features of LSIs is that they are narrow minded. LIIs are also narrow minded, but not as much as LSIs. LSIs are more narrow minded than LIIs. you are too narrow minded to be an LII. in fact, you're so narrow minded that you wont understand this post. therefore you are LSI.
    It almost looks as if you just copied one of machintruc's posts and pasted it here.
    , Se-sub
    8w8-3w8-7w8 sx/sx

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    actually i think he makes a point of hyphenating the words narrow-minded. a critical oversight.

  5. #5
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LSI : brutal, hostile, pushy, rigid, misanthropic
    LII : gentle, friendly, compliant, tolerant, empathetic

  6. #6
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    What makes you think I'm LSI ?
    You do not appear to have strong or valued Ne.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  7. #7
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    LSI : brutal, hostile, pushy, rigid, misanthropic
    LII : gentle, friendly, compliant, tolerant, empathetic
    Is this supposed to be a case for or against your being LSI?
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  8. #8
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    You do not appear to have strong or valued Ne.
    I appear even less to have strong or verbal . I mean, do you have any examples of my ?

  9. #9
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think Machintruc is usually being facetious and that this might have something to do with Fe dual-seeking. I think that he likes to mock looking at things from only one point of view, and that this actually reflects his creative Ne *because* it is deliberate.

    For instance, perhaps his recent thread about the enneagram 4 being more Si than Ni was a sort of mockery of the "narrow-minded" view that 4 can *only* be an intuitive type.

    I think that he just posts a lot of Ti stuff (well, duh)... and get the impression that he's responsive to what people say about it (even if he doesn't post an actual reply).

    Though... he does seem to value "boldness" and he encouraged someone to have more conflicts in their life (don't remember who), and this sort of thing could appear to be Se-valuing (not sure).

    (I could be wrong about any of this. It's just my current impression.)

    Oops, Machintruc started this thread and I said all that in the 3rd person. Just pretend it's in the second person.

  10. #10
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Though... he does seem to value "boldness" and he encouraged someone to have more conflicts in their life (don't remember who), and this sort of thing could appear to be Se-valuing (not sure).
    I'm only encouraging conflicts, not to be physical. Just in order to improve our model of Truth and reality, and make it more accurate. It's , not .

  11. #11
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    I'm only encouraging conflicts, not to be physical. Just in order to improve our model of Truth and reality, and make it more accurate. It's , not .
    doesn't Ezra seem to encourage conflicts in a similar way?

  12. #12
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    You do not appear to have strong or valued Ne.
    Yeah, I agree. My reason for thinking LSI - assuming I did, which I don't (I don't particularly care) would be more >, rather than directly.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  13. #13
    Currently God Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nevada
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,246
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    I'm only encouraging conflicts, not to be physical. Just in order to improve our model of Truth and reality, and make it more accurate. It's , not .
    That strikes me as . If there's any disagreement, it's a break in the logical structure, and it needs to be repaired (possibly by convincing the other person to change their part).



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

  14. #14
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    Yeah, I agree. My reason for thinking LSI - assuming I did, which I don't (I don't particularly care) would be more >, rather than directly.
    Then how do I relate to ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •