Rick's New Socionic Test Online

[Rick]

Hi everyone,
I have to leave in 5 minutes, so I cannot wait till my partners fix the last glitches, but I have created a socionics test at http://www.mizami.nl/public_html/questionnaire. The algorithm is working now, but there are a couple glitches that will be fixed by tomorrow morning. Please try the test starting tomorrow and talk about it in this thread. When I get back Monday I will respond to any questions and feedback, possibly improving some questions, and I will explain what this test is about and stuff.

[implied]

oh man, not even posting these results hah. someone else go first.

[Expat]

Eie>lie>iee

[eunice]

EIE, LIE and IEE.

[Expat]

We're all impatient - let's try tomorrow as Rick requested.

[Minde]

Question: Is this tomorrow yet?


Edit: Expat beat me to it.

[implied]

* Logical Intuitive Extravert , probability: 0.2015

* Logical Intuitive Introvert , probability: 0.0993

* Intuitive Logical Extravert , probability: 0.0993

LIE 0.2015 Your result
LII 0.0993 These types might also be considered
ILE 0.0993
LSE 0.0993
EIE 0.0993 These types are not very likely
IEE 0.0489
ILI 0.0489
SLE 0.0489
LSI 0.0489 These types are quite unlikely
ESE 0.0489
EII 0.0489
IEI 0.0241
SLI 0.0241 these types are extremely unlikely
ESI 0.0241
SEE 0.0241
SEI 0.0119

[Creepy-Cyclops]

Test Junkies

[implied]

for sure!

[Minde]

Test Junkies

Who seem to have trouble reading directions...

[Kristiina]

Intuitive Ethical Extravert , probability: 0.2366
Ethical Intuitive Extravert , probability: 0.1882
Sensing Ethical Extravert , probability: 0.0939

Least likely is ISTj with 0.006

I think IEE was higher than EIE because I mostly don't like to meet new people. 15/16 of them are not my duals and 3/4 of them aren't even in my quadra. I say something "funny" and they stare at me like I'm nuts. Besides, I don't know what reactions to expect of them so I often end up being too quiet and shy in the beginning.

[XoX]

Joy will so boycott this test.

[XoX]

Question: Is this tomorrow yet?

If taken out of context and placed in the best forum quotes thread this would look really funny.

[aestrivex]

• Intuitive Logical Introvert , probability: 0.1478

• Intuitive Logical Extravert , probability: 0.1435

• Logical Intuitive Introvert , probability: 0.0891

ILI0.1478Your resultILE0.1435These types might also be consideredLII0.0891LIE0.0865IEI0.0812These types are not very likely IEE0.0788SLI0.0565SLE0.0549EII0.0489These types are quite unlikely EIE0.0475LSI0.0341LSE0.0331SEI0.031these types are extremely unlikely SEE0.0301ESI0.0187ESE0.0182

[Slacker]

So we shouldn't really take this till tomorrow it sounds like? I took it anyway because other people did, and I can always take it again tomorrow

LIE>LII>ILE

I do like reading and learning about things and sharing what I've learned with people, and that question came up, but I don't think that makes me a logical type.

[Blaze]

Test results

ILE0.1537Your result

• Intuitive Logical Extravert , probability: 0.1537SLE0.1124These types might also be considered
  • Sensing Logical Extravert , probability: 0.1124IEE0.0965
    • Intuitive Ethical Extravert , probability: 0.0965ILI0.0853LIE0.0745These types are not very likely SEE0.0706SLI0.0624LSE0.0545IEI0.0536These types are quite unlikely EIE0.0468LII0.0413SEI0.0392ESE0.0342these types are extremely unlikely LSI0.0302EII0.026ESI0.019

[Gilly]

Ile>ili=sle=lie>iee=lii=sli=iei>lse=eie=see=lsi>ei i=sei=ese=esi

How come I didn't get percentages?

[duality is cringe]

ILE Your result
ILI These types might also be considered
LIE
LII
IEE These types are not very likely
SLE
IEI
SLI
EIE These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EII
LSI
SEE these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
ESI


I am usually typed as SLI.

[implied]

i think the Si questions are a bit odd.

[Suomea]

ILE Your result
ILI These types might also be considered
LIE
LII
IEE These types are not very likely
SLE
IEI
SLI
EIE These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EII
LSI
SEE these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
ESI

P.S. For the job one's the three choices were:

much better
better
probably better

I just kinda assumed probably better ment probably worse or probably not better.

[Slacker]

ILE Your result
ILI These types might also be considered
LIE
LII
IEE These types are not very likely
SLE
IEI
SLI
EIE These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EII
LSI
SEE these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
ESI

P.S. For the job one's the three choices were:

much better
better
probably better

I just kinda assumed probably better ment probably worse or probably not better.

That could have screwed me up. I just left them blank if they weren't any kind of better. LOL

[implied]

P.S. For the job one's the three choices were:

much better
better
probably better

I just kinda assumed probably better ment probably worse or probably not better.

yeah, this was kind of an odd way of phrasing it. but so positive!

[Cuddly McFluffles]

Test results

Your result ILE
These types might also be considered ILI IEE LIE
These types are not very likely IEI LII SLE EIE
These types are quite unlikely SLI EII SEE LSE
These types are extremely unlikely SEI LSI ESE ESI

Huh.

[munenori2]

There are glitches in the system! Oh noes, what shall we do?

Oh, that's right. Wait a day.

[Jimbean]

Ile

[BLauritson]

I took it anyway just because everyone else was.

Your result
ILE
These types might also be considered
ILI
IEE
LIE
These types are not very likely
IEI
LII
EIE
SLE
These types are quite unlikely
EII
SLI
SEE
LSE
these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
LSI
ESE
ESI

Hmm.. I'll try again another time when these mysterious glitches have been fixed methinks. Also lal@how I could apparently be Fi PoLR or Fi creative or Fi HA or Fi DS. I also thought the job questions were confusing - I only put an answer for one of them because the others still seemed to indicate some approval of that job, yet I didn't like any of the others. I only chose the one about seeing the same people and doing the same tasks because that describes my current job pretty well.

[Joy]

Joy will so boycott this test.

Nope, for two reasons:

First and foremost, answering the questions is optional.

Secondly, it asks other questions besides just gender.

[XoX]

Secondly, it asks other questions besides just gender.

What's the logic behind that? I thought that was just going to be worse.
i missed the fact that the questions were optimal though.

[Park]

ILE Your result
ILI These types might also be considered
LIE
IEE
LII These types are not very likely
IEI
EIE
EII
SLE These types are quite unlikely
SLI
LSE
SEE
LSI these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
ESI

WTF?

[leckysupport]

At least now Rick's got an idea where the bug(s) are...

[Suomea]

I think I was right..... everyone is an ILE. Why did I give up on thinking that?

[Logos]

Well I think that some of the -related questions have at times a -bend to them.

[consentingadult]

I've taken the test but forgot to copy the results, came out ILE, with IEE, LIE and if I recall correctly, ILI.

Although I see minor flaws in some of the questions, overall I'm very, very impressed with the quality of the questions and the questionnaire as a whole. Love to see the final version, as it looks very promising. Good job!

[XoX]

what did you get?

same as everyone else

[munenori2]

no kidding? lol do you think this stuff is is accurate it gives out same results for same types of real people? or is it just that Rick's algorithm needs tuning?

I'm sure these are the bugs Rick was talking about. It isn't calculating everything correctly at the moment. Give it say 12 more hours or so and in theory the test should be running more according to plan.

[XoX]

Give it say 12 more hours or so and in theory the test should be running more according to plan.

My bet is Rick's underpaid minions are drinking beer and partying now that he and his scary whip left the factory. Thus it might take a little bit more.

[munenori2]

Well, if I'm still ENTp tomorrow, I guess we'll know who's slacking.

Then of course they shall fall victim to the firing squad.

[tereg]

I went ahead and took it. I'll take it tomorrow as well.

ILE Your result
ILI These types might also be considered
LIE
LII
IEE These types are not very likely
IEI
EIE
EII
SLE These types are quite unlikely
SLI
LSE
LSI
SEE these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
ESE
ESI

[Slacker]

We aren't a very patient group, are we? I wonder what Rick will say when he reads this thread. ROFL. "I told them to wait!"

[consentingadult]

We aren't a very patient group, are we? I wonder what Rick will say when he reads this thread. ROFL. "I told them to wait!"

I was actually wondering if we aren't subjects in some social-psychological experiment which had an objective totally different from what we assumed.... nah, too much work seems to have gone in the questionnaire for that... I hope...