Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Girl on Girl ENFJ-ISTJ Video

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Girl on Girl ENFJ-ISTJ Video

    gay sex
    Last edited by istpunk; 07-17-2008 at 06:37 PM.

  2. #2
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,707
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's fun watching girls get catty...so long as i'm a good 10 feet away at all times.
    "Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."

    - Voltaire

  3. #3
    jessica129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,121
    Mentioned
    77 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol, the bananna was a nice touch.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,044
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm assuming Isabell is supposed to be the ISTj? But why?

  5. #5
    Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9,168
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I see neither as an LSI. Bunnie Boiler is more likely to be an SLE, if anything. As for Isabelle, I'd say she was an irate woman.

  6. #6
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,747
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    I see neither as an LSI. Bunnie Boiler is more likely to be an SLE, if anything. As for Isabelle, I'd say she was an irate woman.
    are you sure? i thought she was a sort of sarah-silverman-ish ENFj.

    i agree i LOL'ed at the banana bit.
    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  7. #7
    Suomea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    1,054
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Bunny Boiler deserved a lot worse than what she got..... oh well.
    Suomea

  8. #8
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was hoping "girl on girl" meant something else.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  9. #9
    Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    9,168
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    I was hoping "girl on girl" meant something else.
    So was I.

    Are you a lesbian, Joy?

  10. #10
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Eh, beta video I guess.
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,044
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dee View Post
    Isabelle is ENFP or INFP i think.
    I have no idea what Isabelle is.

    -------------------

    I must concur... the banana thing was extremely amusing. It was just beyond ridiculous.
    Last edited by marooned; 02-14-2008 at 09:01 PM.

  12. #12
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The woman handled it so wrong. Sad really. It was ok until the "I wore my bra, do you like it?". I think she should have had her fun with the bitchy woman, saying subtle mean things to her, making mean comments one after another. "Oh you wore your bikiny, did you? Ah, I was just about to warn you that your bra is showing.". Or better yet, I would have started dominating the conversation, saying whatever to start a new conversation between just me and the other woman. The guy shouldn't really care if he has no interest in the stranger who just started talking... And if the guy gets angry for messing up the nice dialogue with the sexy woman, then it's time to get angry at the guy.
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  13. #13
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    So was I.

    Are you a lesbian, Joy?
    Lesbian? No. One's gender doesn't make it any more or less likely that I'll be attracted to him/her.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristiina View Post
    Or better yet, I would have started dominating the conversation, saying whatever to start a new conversation between just me and the other woman.
    Yeah, that's always fun.

    And if the guy gets angry for messing up the nice dialogue with the sexy woman, then it's time to get angry at the guy.
    I'd get rid of him, personally. But that's just me.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,044
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There did seem to be a sort of insecurity to the relationship between Isabelle and Whatshisname in the video. It was apparent when "the sexy woman" (to steal Kristiina's name for her) started hitting on the guy because he was slightly too responsive (even though it wasn't blatant), and Isabelle was slightly too defensive... at first Isabelle didn't do anything about it, perhaps because she was insecure about how Whatshisname would respond to this. And Whatshisname's attention really centered on the sexy woman, perhaps a bit too much. Even when the two of them were on the show later, the sort of uncomfortable insecurity of the relationship seemed to be present. She was I think overdoing a show of security/stability, like leaning into him too far (in a way that seemed rather unmatched by him), and he, again, didn't seem very responsive. I thought the sexy woman had it correct when she contradicted Whatshisname's remark that he wasn't tempted. He really didn't seem all that into the relationship from my pov. I don't think that relationship will last very long (if it still exists) for some reason... it seems sort of forced, or like they both aren't really being honest with themselves about it.

  15. #15
    lefty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NY, NY
    Posts
    586
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think you have the personality types and quadrant wrong and I think the title of the thread doesn't deliver.
    Lefty
    ENFJ

    "I'm Sick of Old Men Dreaming Up Wars for Young Men To Die In," George McGovern.

  16. #16
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    There did seem to be a sort of insecurity to the relationship between Isabelle and Whatshisname in the video. It was apparent when "the sexy woman" (to steal Kristiina's name for her) started hitting on the guy because he was slightly too responsive (even though it wasn't blatant), and Isabelle was slightly too defensive... at first Isabelle didn't do anything about it, perhaps because she was insecure about how Whatshisname would respond to this. And Whatshisname's attention really centered on the sexy woman, perhaps a bit too much. Even when the two of them were on the show later, the sort of uncomfortable insecurity of the relationship seemed to be present. She was I think overdoing a show of security/stability, like leaning into him too far (in a way that seemed rather unmatched by him), and he, again, didn't seem very responsive. I thought the sexy woman had it correct when she contradicted Whatshisname's remark that he wasn't tempted. He really didn't seem all that into the relationship from my pov. I don't think that relationship will last very long (if it still exists) for some reason... it seems sort of forced, or like they both aren't really being honest with themselves about it.
    I agree with you. Those two people don't belong together.
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  17. #17
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dee View Post
    that girl sure knows how to turn on a man's whatdoyoucallit, mojo lol
    She has an attractive body, but her personality is not attractive at all. ST women, or very Se women, (or non socionics wise, women with so much "balls"), are just not attractive to me in how they carry themselves.

    It's like being hit on by a guy. No thanks.
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  18. #18
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,747
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP View Post
    She has an attractive body, but her personality is not attractive at all. ST women, or very Se women, (or non socionics wise, women with so much "balls"), are just not attractive to me in how they carry themselves.

    It's like being hit on by a guy. No thanks.
    i have no idea how you could possibly believe that jessica, for instance, is mannish.
    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  19. #19
    Creepy-krae

    Default ENFj-ISTj r the shit



    lmaoo

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    us
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    el oh el

  21. #21
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,806
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LOL I love how americans say OH MY GOD I LOOOOOOVE THIS
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  22. #22
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this girl is scary.

    why is she brought up on this forum?
    The end is nigh

  23. #23
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm abused and confused.

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    155
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That's an ENFj?

  25. #25
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaz View Post
    That's an ENFj?
    No it's not. I agree with you. It's a P type.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •