a list of teachers by subject/type

[aestrivex]

these are a number of teachers or otherwise school-related people that i've had or interacted with to some degree in the past three and half years. this is not intended to have any real purpose but rather something i threw together because i was bored, and it only reflects those teachers of whose types i'm more or less certain.

some of the correlations are relatively what somebody might expect out of stereotypical MBTI-isms. some of them aren't.



SLI physics
ILI global history. he's now a government teacher; he was a new teacher who knew nothing about global.
SEI required literature
LII chemistry
ESI economics
LIE baseball
SLE baseball
ILE math - honors precalculus. the single best teacher i've ever had.
SEI spanish literature
ILI chemistry
LSE global history
ESE health
IEE 20th century american literature. a large focus of the class was post-1980 popular literature.
EII required literature
SEI baseball
ESI choral music
LSE american history
ESI physical education
IEI existentialist philosophy
SLI spanish language
LSE technology - a bullshit class. he was blind so the typing probably means nothing.
LII/ILE math - MQ6 honors
LSI drafting (technical drawing)
LSI biology
ESE american government
SEI math - calculus
SEE spanish language
LIE math - MQ5 (standard specialized-level intermediate algebra).
ILI orchestral music
ESI global history
SEE baseball

[munenori2]

My fiction teacher this semester is a very likely IEE. As for philosophy, I've had a few LIIs, though I once had an LIE whose class was a blast. I'm not sure what my Chinese Thought professor was but my guess is ILE.

[Exodus]

It seems like the overwhelming majority of college profs are intuitive. I've only had one sensor so far (the ESTp whose syllabus I posted), and he's not even really a professor.

[FDG]

College...

LIE - Business I
ESI - Business II
LIE - Economics I
IEE - Economics II
ILI - Economics III
ILI - Economics IV
ILI - Game Theory
LIE - Econometrics I
SEE - Econometrics II
ESI - Math I
ILI - Math II
ILE - Math III
ILI - Math IV
EIE - Economic History
LSI - History of Economic Though
LIE - Macroeconomics I and II
LEI - Statistics I and II and III

ILI professors were the best by far. LIEs as second. SEE and IEE by far the worst
ILE best math teacher

[machintruc]

LEI - Statistics I and II and III

Congratulations. You just found the 17th socionic type.

[FDG]

Congratulations. You just found the 17th socionic type.

:=P

[meatburger]

College...
SEE and IEE by far the worst

Well shit teaching economics im not suprised

Philosophy tutor and lecturer = LII (lecturer very good, humorous and intelligent)
Sociology - INFj
Sociology - ISFj
Psychology tutor - ESTj

[munenori2]

Hmm, been thinking of some of my other teachers:

EIE - talented and gifted teacher
SEE - Spanish GTA from Santiago de Compostela
SEE - one of my Japanese GTAs
IEE - another Japanese GTA
IEI - yet another Japanese GTA
ESE - and another Japanese GTA
LSI - what? one more Japanese GTA?
ILI - Japanese professor
LSE - American government teacher
ESE/EIE - Western Civilization professor (also one of the smartest, most engaging people I've ever met)

[Ezra]

LSE american history

"You disrespectable sliiiime; you think you'd be a sittin' here if mah father and your father hadn't fought and died for dimahcracy in this world? God bless America!"

[aestrivex]

"You disrespectable sliiiime; you think you'd be a sittin' here if mah father and your father hadn't fought and died for dimahcracy in this world? God bless America!"

umm no.

[strrrng]

some of what I have seen has correlated with niffweed's....

hon physics - LSI (into lifting weights also), then a smart but dry ILE
AP chem - LII
AP statistics (which I think is very Te) - ILI
hon english - all intuitive, an ILE, IEI and EIE (the IEI won teacher of the year a few years back and the EIE is up for nomination)
hon precal - ILE
psych - LIE
nsl - LIE
hon history - ESE
hon chem - IEE (very nice)
global issues - EII
hon calc - EIE...not the best math teacher ever (not suggesting correlation though)

[Ezra]

What do you learn about in American history? Your origins, or the battles you've fought and won?

[aestrivex]

What do you learn about in American history? Your origins, or the battles you've fought and won?

it's a typical history curriculum. we have to learn about all of political history, socioeconomic/cultural history, military history (though things like specific battles in the mexican war are generally deemphasized), and all sorts of other blah.


the actual focus of learning history on a relatively introductory level is almost entirely factually oriented; only a minimal amount is made of critical thinking or analyzing; mostly, where that kind of thing is demanded you have to know about other people's analyses rather than make your own. the class is all about knowing an incredible about of names and events. i suppose that's partially reasonable since at that level you have only a limited body of understanding to work from. even so, it can be interesting to see the parallels within historical societies nonetheless.

[strrrng]

What do you learn about in American history? Your origins, or the battles you've fought and won?

sorry, I knew people would think that was vague. the class was modern world history, so it dealt with the stuff from like 1800 and on....we studied the major wars and stuff like that. what I wish they did was combine history with psychology...that would be sweet

[Not A Communist Shill]

My fave infant school teacher : ESE
Biology EII
Biology SLI
Physics ILE
Physics LII
Chemistry ILI
Chemistry LII
Chemistry LSE
Maths LSI
English ESI
English SEI
French IEI
German LIE
History LIE
Music LSI
Music EIE
IT SLE
Computing SLI
Environmental Science SLE
Electronics LSI

[Blaze]

it's a typical history curriculum. we have to learn about all of political history, socioeconomic/cultural history, military history (though things like specific battles in the mexican war are generally deemphasized), and all sorts of other blah.


the actual focus of learning history on a relatively introductory level is almost entirely factually oriented; only a minimal amount is made of critical thinking or analyzing; mostly, where that kind of thing is demanded you have to know about other people's analyses rather than make your own. the class is all about knowing an incredible about of names and events. i suppose that's partially reasonable since at that level you have only a limited body of understanding to work from. even so, it can be interesting to see the parallels within historical societies nonetheless.

yeah HS history is totally like that. i don't know why. they take what is so so so intrinsically interesting and make it maaaad wood.

[Jimbean]

a lot of my econ/business instructors were ISXj's

[FDG]

a lot of my econ/business instructors were ISXj's

Doesn't sound that motivating.