1. If you had to group the INTjs here

Which group would i belong to?

Been thinking more about some confusing parts of me and the recent disagreement I seem to have with you sparked curiosity in making a thread.

2. Groups?

4. Thinking? :-P

6. the?

7. Question Mark? What's he done wrong?

8. The only real distinction that I can possibly say that I make between the INTjs are 1) the sane ones and 2) the questionably less than sane ones.

9. yeah, ya know intj's are just so .... intj. not sure i see separate groups of them.

obvious ones: mystic sonic, thehotelambush, oyburger, ms. k, logos

not so obvious: pedro the lion, subterranean, carla

10. i would differentiate them into those that have usernames alphabetically ahead of or equal to the letter j and those that do not.

11. I think I would group as follows:

tcaudilllg, machintruc

MysticSonic, pedro

Ms. K.

oyburger

Logos, Carla, thehotelambush

I think this is based on how I percieve them reacting to me if I was to meet them - I'm not going to tell you which is the positive end or the negative end, because this would be cruel. I may have to explain myself if people insist .

12. hmmm... i've been thinking about this a lot lately and i am convinced that there is a considerable probability that my true type might perhaps after all in essence be INTj.

13. Originally Posted by Mustachio
hmmm... i've been thinking about this a lot lately and i am convinced that there is a considerable probability that my true type might perhaps after all in essence be INTj.
what on earth is going here? lol

14. Originally Posted by Subterranean
I think I would group as follows:

tcaudilllg, machintruc

MysticSonic, pedro

Ms. K.

oyburger

Logos, Carla, thehotelambush

I think this is based on how I percieve them reacting to me if I was to meet them - I'm not going to tell you which is the positive end or the negative end, because this would be cruel. I may have to explain myself if people insist .

im in a class by myself?

15. Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
im in a class by myself?
It's just the way I split it up - I see you as somewhere between those two groups. It may be that you are more similar to one group than another, but it's just a rough reference thingy. I could have put everyone in one group, but I wouldn't have been putting my to much use.

16. Originally Posted by Loki
what on earth is going here? lol
yes, this is ludicrous i know, but i have to be strong. you too Loki be strong. i'm coming out of the closet. there, i'm INTj!

17. Your opinion of your type is clearly in a "volatile" state... perhaps in a few weeks it will have settled back into something constant.

LII's often change their type because they need to be strong.

18. Originally Posted by Loki
Your opinion of your type is clearly in a "volatile" state... perhaps in a few weeks it will have settled back into something constant.

LII's often change their type because they need to be strong.

19. Originally Posted by Subterranean
I think I would group as follows:

tcaudilllg, machintruc

MysticSonic, pedro

Ms. K.

oyburger

Logos, Carla, thehotelambush

I think this is based on how I percieve them reacting to me if I was to meet them - I'm not going to tell you which is the positive end or the negative end, because this would be cruel. I may have to explain myself if people insist .
gee, thats a hard one to figure out.

would you rather meet logos, carla, and hotelambush or tcaud and machintruc? hmm.... who would i rather meet? hmm....

Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•