Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: -

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    -
    Last edited by Dee; 02-26-2009 at 03:05 AM.

  2. #2
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this is a more simple description :

    block 12 : high amount, high quality
    block 34 : low amount, high quality
    block 56 : low amount, low quality
    block 78 : high amount, low quality

  3. #3
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dee View Post
    i'd change that to:

    block 12 : high amount, high quality
    block 34 : medium amount, low-medium quality
    block 56 : medium amount, low-medium quality
    block 78 : medium amount, high quality
    No, otherwise it wouldn't be symmetrical.

  4. #4
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think Machintruc just wants it to fit neatly into a punnett square.

  5. #5
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    I think Machintruc just wants it to fit neatly into a punnett square.
    Augusta wanted too, that's where Model A come from. Even if a few socionists still retain Model J.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    95
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How about:

    ego: I'm pretty good at it and interested in it.
    super-ego: I'm not so good at it and not really interested either.
    super-id: I'm not so good at it, but really interested.
    id: I'm pretty good at it, but not very interested.

    ?

  7. #7
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mm View Post
    How about:

    ego: I'm pretty good at it and interested in it.
    super-ego: I'm not so good at it and not really interested either.
    super-id: I'm not so good at it, but really interested.
    id: I'm pretty good at it, but not very interested.

    ?
    strong = competent

    verbal = interested

  8. #8
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dee View Post
    valued = verbal ()

    personally i think these are alright. more!
    They are valued verbally, whereas strong functions are valued physically, and conscious functions are valued intellectually.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •