Looking for a chart (attn: Expat)

[Rocky]

I'm looking for the chart that was on Lytov's site about the correlations between socionics types and Kiersey types. The one where they gave the Kiersey profiles to socionists and they put socionics labels to them.

thanks

[Not A Communist Shill]

It's on this page, about halfway down:

http://www.socioniko.net/en/articles/lytovs-intro3.html

[Rocky]

perfect


/thread

[Expat]

That's great - the last time I checked it, the new owner of the site had taken them down. I had saved the charts themselves, but not the whole article.

Some quotes by Lytov:

We proposed the 16 descriptions of the Keirsey types to 108 socionists (this means, each of the 108 read ALL THE 16 descriptions), and we asked them to identify the socionic types in these descriptions.

And the next table represents one more result of this experiment. We asked the participants to indicate their own types, and to recognize their own types in these descriptions

What is interesting is that NOT ONE of the 4 LIEs present thought they were ENTJ; they prefered ENTP, INTJ (3) and "nobody".

NOT ONE of the 6 SLEs thought they were ESTP; they preferred ENTJ and INTJ.

And so on and so forth.

But at least we know now for sure that socionics, MBTT and Keirsey, in spite of their common origin from the Jungian typology, are not identical!

[Ezra]

Watch Phaedrus not reply to this, even though he probably read it.

a) He knows he's wrong.

b) He'd find that if he said "then Lytov is wrong" that he'd be contradicting himself. Earlier on, he uses Lytov in his argument, and says that if we're doubting him, we're doubting "many respectable socionists including Lytov".

I'm looking for the chart that was on Lytov's site about the correlations between socionics types and Kiersey types. The one where they gave the Kiersey profiles to socionists and they put socionics labels to them.

You might be interested in this chart I created. You might not be.