Will Find Xox Type Or Die Trying

**tcaudilllg** · 01-24-2008, 12:21 AM

That's right, Xox: I'm going to REININIZE you. Will find your type OR ELSE.

Xox, please repeat various type arguments you have heard here for REININ analysis.

**aestrivex** · 01-24-2008, 12:33 AM

i think XoX is a IEL ambiverted subtype 0w211.6 se/sw/s

**discojoe** · 01-24-2008, 12:34 AM

He's INFp.

**Ezra** · 01-24-2008, 12:55 AM

He's concerned with his identity.

**Ms. Kensington** · 01-24-2008, 01:50 AM

too much UDP in this thread

**Ezra** · 01-24-2008, 11:51 AM

Too much Ms. Kensington in this thread.

**Phaedrus** · 01-24-2008, 11:59 AM

Too little XoX in this thread. Hurry up, man! It's Judgment Day.

**tcaudilllg** · 01-25-2008, 09:50 AM

We must continue the thread until Xox responds....

**tcaudilllg** · 01-26-2008, 12:00 AM

Hurry Xox... REININ analysis awaits....

**Phaedrus** · 01-26-2008, 05:42 AM

You don't need to hide from it, XoX. He didn't say it's rainin' ... he said Reinin.

**XoX** · 01-26-2008, 06:29 AM

Oh, I didn't notice this. I will post something today. I hope this stays more civilized and somewhat shorter than the last one

Or the one before that. Or the first one. And delivers more

**XoX** · 01-26-2008, 11:28 AM

First a summary. Then some reasoning.

The ones I trust the most (but could still be wrong)
Negativist > Positivist
Static > Dynamic
Merry > Serious
Declarer > Taciturn
Constructivist > Emotivist
Rightist (result) > Leftist (process)
Yielding > Obstinate

The ones I have an opinion of but which I don't trust that much
Strategic > Tactic
Decisive > Judicious
Farsighted > Carefree

The ones I have no real opinion of
Aristocracy vs Democracy

Some reasoning..

Positivists vs Negativists
-> Not crystal clear but I'd still go for negativist because of
my general fault finding approach to things. Concentrate on seeing
problems that should be fixed. Only when there is nothing that needs to be fixed then everything is ok but as a result I feel myself a bit useless. It is hard for me to stay in a place where there are no problems to be fixed. Partly because of this I used to identify with MBTI ISTP before I read about socionics and got confused.

Static vs Dynamic
-> Currently I think static. I cannot properly argue this though.

Merry vs Serious
-> I'm a "serious merry type" imho. So I'd say merry. The way I relate to other people is "merryish" as I don't need a lot of "formal Te information" about them in order to interact with them
informally. I establish relationships quickly and without rituals when I perceive a general compatibility.

Declarer vs Taciturn
-> I would say declarer because of my tendency to monologue. Then the point of my questions is to get an answer. They are not used as a tool for discussion.

Tactical vs Strategic
-> Strategic in the sense that I focus on goals over methods. Whatever method takes me to the goal I can live with. I am not an "artist" in the sense many tactical people are. However I do have some problems with forming long term plans if there is not outside framework which kind of lays down the options for me to choose from.

Constructivist vs Emotivist
-> Constructivist. My tendency to avoid small talk is one example of this. I rarely if ever talk about something which doesn't interest me just for the sake of contributing to the discussion. Then I tend to "repeat emotional states" e.g. watching the same movies again and again to feel the same emotion again and again. This is a clear difference to certain emotivist people who I know.

Judicious vs decisive
-> One of the more difficult ones. Might be either. Based on the very short description in wikisocion might be decisive.

Leftist vs Rightist
-> Rightist. I tend not to follow processes but instead jump from task to task. I often read newspapers from the end to beginning. Or just in whatever order. Order is not a major part of my life. I just do things according to what currently seems like priority one. And the list of priorities adapts itself all the time to new information. As a result I don't always finish tasks if I suddenly find them useless for the end result. Even if I was already quite close to finishing them. This doesn't mean I am always bad at tying up loose ends. Only when the work item has gone "obsolete" in my opinion. Then I drop it and move on.

Aristocrat vs Democrat
-> I really have no idea.

Yielding and Obstinate
-> Clearly yielding. I protect resources over interests. I am very highly and clearly resource protecting.

Carefree and Farsighted
-> Hard one. I think my solutions tend to usually be "short term" and using information "at hand". I just want to see the result quickly. However I tend to prepare for everything beforehand. I am farsighted in how I handle money. And so on. So I cant answer this well. Perhaps farsighted in that I am pretty much always aware of the consequences of my actions. Even when I do a "short term solution" I am aware of the risks there are. I have explored them. However the need to see results fast overrides my need to be farsighted. So I'd say farsighted with the tendency to dismiss the risks involved every now and then in order to get short term gain.

Feel free to challenge my reasoning.