View Poll Results: For the INTjs, submit your results to test # 1

Voters
5. You may not vote on this poll
  • INTj - 1. Right brain, 2. Visual

    1 20.00%
  • INTj - 1. Left brain, 2. Visual

    1 20.00%
  • INTj - 2. Left brain, 2. Auditory

    3 60.00%
  • INTj - 1. Right brain, 2. Auditory

    0 0%
  • INTj - 1. Balanced brain, 2. Auditory

    0 0%
  • INTj - 1. Balanced brain, 2. Visual

    0 0%
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: New Test Experiment: READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS (Alpha version)

  1. #1

    Default New Test Experiment: READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS (Alpha version)

    PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS:
    Ok. A new theory is currently being concocted in my mind. Now I need to do some experimenting. If you recall, I did something similar before. The tests I used, though, were very superficial in nature. Now I have a much better test. If and only if you are an INTj/LII, do take the following test:

    (1) http://mindmedia.com/braintest.html

    Once you have finished, post your result in the poll.

    Afterward (of lesser importance), if you have the time, you may take this other test:
    (2) http://web.tickle.com/tests/brain/au...index_main.jsp

    If you feel inclined to do so, you may post the results to test # 2 in a thread post. DO NOT USE THE RESULTS OF TEST #2 TO POST IN THE POLL.
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carla View Post
    Your Brain Usage Profile:

    Auditory : 50%
    Visual : 50%
    Left : 75%
    Right : 25%

    (You didn't provide for this option in the poll.)

    ASIDE: There were a number of questions where I could have equally picked either of two answers though.
    Meh. Just pick either one of the Left options.
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  3. #3
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,481
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wish I was INTj....
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kamangir View Post
    I wish I was INTj....
    No...

    [Grammar Nazi Mode]

    "I wish I were INTj..."

    [/Grammar Nazi Mode]

    You silly SEI people.
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  5. #5
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,481
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTj is singular so it is "was".

    Were just sounds wrong.
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kamangir View Post
    INTj is singular so it is "was".

    Were just sounds wrong.
    It has absolutely nothing to do with INTj. It could be a cheesecake, a hoard of Indonesian farm-elephants, or one of your great-aunt's kidney stones. It doesn't matter. It will always be "were" as opposed to "was." It's the subjunctive.

    Silly ISFps.
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carla View Post
    In that case you might want to make it countable: "I wish I was an INTj".
    And no, that is still grammatically incorrect.
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carla View Post
    In that case you might want to make it countable: "I wish I was an INTj".

    in either case it's were.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    in either case it's were.
    Exactly.

    It is good to know that there are still some well-spoken individuals.
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  10. #10

    Default

    Yes.

    Now go run along and cease to exist.
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  11. #11
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,481
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I looked at the wikipedia article for the subjunctive mood, and apparently when you use the subjunctive, you need to use "were". Of course no one bothers to unless they have no life and read grammar articles incessantly.
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kamangir View Post
    I looked at the wikipedia article for the subjunctive mood, and apparently when you use the subjunctive, you need to use "were". Of course no one bothers to unless they have no life and read grammar articles incessantly.
    I don't read grammar articles incessantly. I have heard this only once.
    I have a rather good memory.
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    173
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I chose Left brained, visual but my results for visual and auditory were actually pretty balanced:

    Auditory : 47%
    Visual : 52%
    Left : 58%
    Right : 41%
    LII

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    173
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carla View Post
    Ahh, subjunctives.
    I learnt about the subjunctive from learning Spanish - they use it alot more in their language. It's used when talking about doing something not as a reality but as a possibility. It used to also be used alot more in English whereas now it's just mostly implied: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjunctive
    LII

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Auditory : 33%
    Visual : 66%
    Left : 36%
    Right : 63%

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •