This material may shock you. Read with caution.
It's the least ethical typology I ever seen. Even "classical" typology is better.
It's a politically correct way to define 6 types of people :
1. Rigid narrow-minded machines (some caricature of E1)
2. Overly sensitive cry-babies (some caricature of E2)
3. Superficial success-oriented winners (some caricature of E3)
4. Autistic unassertive do-nothings (some caricature of E5)
5. Impulsive over-stimulated retards (some caricature of E7)
6. Aggressive pushy rednecks (some caricature of E8)
That really sounds like discrimination. I don't even have a type here. That's totally retarded. I mean, it's a typology that measures if you're a winner or a loser.
The relational model doesn't even work !!!
I mean, some psychologists or other human sciencists always tell what they feel we want to hear. It's a prototypical E3 behaviour. They are conformist liars. Only the most weak-minded left-wingers people can agree with such a retarded theory. Using such retarded caricatures seriously really disgusts me.
For example, the Management style :
Workaholic : Democratic
Reactor : Benevolant
Persister : Democratic
Rebel : Laissez faire
Dreamer : Autocratic (receives)
Promoter : Autocratic
"(receives)" ??? seriously ??? All types are able to lead but the "Dreamer" !?? It's like when you say only E3's or E8's are able to lead. I really prefer when someone say it's only ENFJ's. At least they are cool people. Threes and Eights aren't.
You see ? Even Eysenck's typology is better. PCM lacks logical consistency.
Maybe I'll create my own model, with only two types :
- Outgoing Type (non-ILI's) 93.75% of people
- Shy Type (ILI's) : 6.25% of people
At least it'd be better than this piece of s**t, because it wouldn't lack boldness or straightforwardness.
You know, 18954217 years ago, I was a retarded fish-frog. That's basically the same thing.
You know, I'm shy, and I can't expect love or friendship from others. I can't even expect to have a social life or a work.
BTW, I have known a very awesome SEI +-- girl which suffered all her life because she was too weak-minded (hence, Pavlov's weak type). Don't be weak-minded. Go seek and boldly defend the truth. PRAISE CHRIST.
EDIT: Censored unrespectful things
EDIT2: I think Kahler was SEE.