Results 1 to 32 of 32

Thread: Which club do you find least attractive?

  1. #1
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Which club do you find least attractive?

    By that I mean, which do you generally find yourself least attracted to having a relationship with.

    The choices are ST, SF, NT, and NF.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  2. #2
    aka Slacker Slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North Korea
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    8,819
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmm, oddly probably other NFs.
    It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
    -Mark Twain


    You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.

  3. #3
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,406
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Mickey Mouse Club.
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  4. #4
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  5. #5
    aka Slacker Slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North Korea
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    8,819
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I take that back. I have a ton of NF friends.

    I don't know.
    It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
    -Mark Twain


    You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.

  6. #6
    I'm back, assholes! Herzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    5,098
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    Probably SF. Of the four relationships I've had that have lasted more than a month, three were with SFs. I'm totally turned off to most of them now because of it (although I could allow for exceptions if that SF were particularly hot).
    , Se-sub
    8w8-3w8-7w8 sx/sx

  7. #7
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slacker Mom View Post
    I take that back. I have a ton of NF friends.

    I don't know.
    Unless they're "friendly" friends, this is irrelevant.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  8. #8
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was wondering if one's least favorite club (relationship wise) may be indicative of their subtype.

    An intuitive subtype NF's least favorite might be SF's. An intuitive subtype NT's least favorite might be ST's. An ethical subtype NF's might be NT's. Etc.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  9. #9
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    I was wondering if one's least favorite club (relationship wise) may be indicative of their subtype.
    I might add that when I think of any club besides ST's. NF's would be next in terms of least differentiation from mirrors/quasis/contraries. Then NT's. When it comes to SF's though, I can't not have a hard time distinguishing from mirrors/quasis/contraries.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't have relationships with clubs.

  11. #11
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    prude
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  12. #12
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=12929

    But even so, ST's are the reason I know I'm not Beta or Delta.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    By that I mean, which do you generally find yourself least attracted to having a relationship with.

    The choices are ST, SF, NT, and NF.
    It varies, based off three factors: (1) Gender. (2) Quadra. (3) Rationality vs. Irrationality

    Least favorite out of males: A tie between SF (Alpha SF in particular) and ST (ST rational, specifically)
    Least favorite out of females: Again, ST rational and SF (this time, either Gamma or Alpha).
    Classical socionics: (), ILI-Ni
    Dual-type theory: INTp-ENTp

    5w6 sp/sx
    MBTI: INTJ

  14. #14
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,406
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fellow NTs probably. What they have, I already have, and I do not want more of something I can already provide for myself.
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA.
    TIM
    INTj
    Posts
    4,497
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    well.. for me it's SFs. (then STs). Probably most attracted relationship wise to NFs.

    EDIT: actually now that i think about it might be equal.. but i still slightly more repelled from SF than ST.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,687
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    probably NTs (just going by the people who I have some idea of in real life).... or SFs

  17. #17
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,406
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    I don't have relationships with clubs.
    Just one-night stands then for ya, eh?
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  18. #18
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,632
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    I don't have relationships with clubs.
    +1

    but if i really have to: shallow SFs, too nerdy NTs, cold STs, dramatic NFs
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  19. #19
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    From empirical evidence -- that is, from among the people I have had relationships of any kind with - probably STs. However, it is really splitting hairs since one of my best friends is LSI, and a lifelong friend is SLI.

    Regarding anything resembling romantic relationships, though: I can include SF, NF, and NT, but not one ST.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  20. #20
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have, unfortunately, been with an ST at more than one point. An LSE and an LSI. I've never been with an NF.

    Serious relationships: ESI, LSE, LSI, LII, ESI

    The one with the LSE was the worst, followed by the one with the LSI.

    Quote Originally Posted by Salawa View Post
    I wouldn't mind an NT partner. It would be unbalanced, yes, but there would be a high degree of mutual understanding (even in opposing quadras, at least to some extent), and probably some common interests. If nothing else it would be a stimulating partnership.
    The only NT I could see myself with would be an identical. I've learned from experience that contrary relations, while convenient, are disastrous in the long run (though in a subtle way). And there's a reason I've never been with an irrational type.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  21. #21
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    who i've had relationships with: SLE, EIE, ESE (a fling), IEI, SLE, IEI. in that order.

    so, i reason that the people i've actually had relationships with beat out other types, so the other types must be the worse since they didn't even get in the game. therefore for romantic relationships, from worst to best i'd have to say:

    NT haven't been any
    SF only one and it was a fling
    ST there've been 2, one sucked the other lasted 15 years
    NF there've been 3 and 2 of these have been good

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  22. #22
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I get along with :

    Light Socials - they're very attractive
    Light Humanitarians - they're attractive too, even if they look retarded
    Light Pragmatists - don't trust those myersian caricatures, Light ST's are cool people
    Heavy Researchers - they may look geeky, but they are quite friendly

    I don't get along with :

    Heavy Socials - too pushy for me, but SEE's may be quite cool
    Heavy Humanitarians - too tape-recorder-like for me
    Heavy Pragmatists - too narrow-minded for me, I don't like alpha male nerds
    Light Researchers - I can't find what's appropriate to say because they make me feel wanna kill myself

  23. #23
    MysticSonic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,993
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ST, probably.
    "To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"

    "Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."

  24. #24
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Purely hypothetically, I'd say STs. Haven't really had enough experience to differentiate, but I wouldn't imagine myself enjoying a romantic relationship with an ST that much. I could be wrong of course.
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  25. #25
    Suomea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    1,054
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slacker Mom View Post
    Hmm, oddly probably other NFs.
    Nod, prolly other NTs for me.
    Suomea

  26. #26

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    852
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Least attractive is hard to say, maybe NTs and NFs because I just don't find intuitive males... especially NF males sexually attractive even when I like them a lot . Most attractive is ST by far.
    Socionics: XNFx
    MBTI: INFJ

  27. #27
    Éminence grise mikemex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Third Planet
    TIM
    IEE-Ne
    Posts
    1,631
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SF.
    [] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)

    You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life.
    - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.

  28. #28
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,481
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I could never get along with Beta NF for sure

    Maybe Delta NF, but idk.
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  29. #29
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Romantically, STs.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  30. #30
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,632
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I generally get along pretty well with ISTx girls, better with ISTp than ISTj probably. But I am sure we'd both be clueless in a romantic relationship.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  31. #31
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Um, Extreme SF's?

  32. #32
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,632
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Salawa View Post
    What makes you think that you personally are clueless in romantic relationships?

    I mean, I know I disagree with almost everything you say on relationships, but clueless is the last thing I'd think of you. Really you seem like you'd be quite a sensitive partner.
    Oh yeah, I don't have a problem with being sensitive-attentive to other people's needs. My cluelessness is mostly in the "how does the other person feels towards me" department.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •