Removed by User Request
Removed by User Request
Last edited by DeleteMePLOX; 01-23-2008 at 08:12 AM.
Do you often think of what you're going with your life in the future, in the bigger scheme of things? Or you're more likely to take it as it comes and cross the bridge when you get there?
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Right now, I think you're IEI... I don't have a reason, I think I just sort of subconsciously lumped you in that category.
All you need to do is figure out what your dominant function is, and its relation to your dual seeking function can help.
Do you feel more comfortable with taking care of people, or do you feel like you need to be protected with strong reassurance?
Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.
Urf ... hate when people refuse explain their reasonings ...
Chibi, I think you're alpha SF because of the silliest reason ever - your color preference. I remember you posted some art a long time ago and it had many bold bright colors in unexpected combinations. Very bold and free and artsy. Seems more common in people who have strong . Also your general post style and attitude is much more light than betas tend to have. ISFp is most likely IMO.
ChibiKeba, if you really want to know whether you are an ISFp or an INFp, why are you listening to those people who can do nothing but expressing their subjective opinions? They are only guessing, whereas I have provided you with the methods that will enable you to find the correct answer once and for all.
You don't seem to take my suggestions seriously, because if you did, you wouldn't continue with this stupid guessing game. Have you read Keirsey? Have you taken his tests? Are you an Artisan or are you an Idealist? Have you forgot our analysis from the past and what it resulted in? The "grounds" for doubt that you have expressed in this thread are laughable to tell you the truth.
You can think scientifically can't you? But it doesn't really matter if you don't think you can do the analysis yourself, because I have told you exactly what to do, so you only have to follow my instructions. Now, start doing that please, and stop acting like a child.
FWIW, your posts and writing style here seem clearly Si > Ni to me. Sounds like you're leaning towards ISFp and your only basis for remaining neutral is a bunch of hyperliteral garbage spouted by armchair socionists. For the record, I've known some very intelligent ISFps who would probably be typed INFP by MBTIdiots. In reality, "Si" isn't just worrying about "physical states" -- Si blocked with Fe tends to manifest itself much more obviously as being worried about people's internal emotional states, emotional atmosphere, etc.
And not to perpetuate the stereotype that Si = being artistic, but a lot of the stuff on your DeviantArt page seems daring/original in a way that demonstrates confidence in Si. Not that that's conclusive at all.
Finally... Socionics typing is unscientific. If you are the kind of person who believes that all you have to do to discover your socionics type is "think scientifically," I'll hypothesize that you're also the kind of person who falls for email scams on a regular basis.
delta nf (?) ... 4w5 (?)
discovering your type="think scientifically"+"introspection"Finally... Socionics typing is unscientific. If you are the kind of person who believes that all you have to do to discover your socionics type is "think scientifically," I'll hypothesize that you're also the kind of person who falls for email scams on a regular basis.
Do I fail at life if I think that way? Probably. Because I fall for those Nigerian widows daily.
btw Chibi, your DA is superb, I suck at art, probably because I get discouraged I can never be as good as my brother who's 4 years younger. But I love to create and call it mine.
This is me and my dual being scientific together
I don't know what type ChibiKeba is, and it sounds as maybe she won't be listening (and good luck, ChibiKeba. Hope we haven't confused you irrevocably!), but I would like to comment on a few things.
First, it seems to me that the difference between the SEI vs. IEI approach to art is that SEIs tend to go for something that's very concretely realized, often a perfect, simple, and clear realization of experience, often detail oriented, perhaps decorative and functional, whereas IEIs will tend more towards broad psychological, expressionistic, and symbolic tendencies. However, there are a lot of artists who fall somewhat in between. I'm not convinced that one can always make a clear distinction of the "line" in between, except the obvious to say that IEIs idealize Se (e.g.. the knight in shining armour), and SEIs idealize Ne.
As to who uses bright colors, I think that's completely inconclusive; it depends on what the bright colors are used for.
In particular, at least according to one view, accepting-Ni people, while they probably often think about consequences and trends, and may dream of some big goals they wish to achieve some day, may be sufficiently disconnected with the practical matters of life to the extent that they appear more likely to "take it as it comes and cross the bridge when you get there."
Constant attention to where one's going in one's life and how to get to the next step seems to me somewhat related with extraversion. That is, a person has to care enough about the external world to actually take the steps necessary to progress. This isn't to say that there aren't a lot of "driven" Ip types who are succeeding in going from Point A to Point B, but I'm not convinced that INps would necessarily be driven and planful in that sense; they may very well "take it as comes" but indulge themselves not in sensory activities but more Ni-related ones.
I think may involve focusing on the future, the past, and generally not being in the present...and furthermore, the thoughts may not necessarily be about one's own personal life at all.