Results 1 to 28 of 28

Thread: Which do you find least attractive in a potential mate?

  1. #1
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Which do you find least attractive in a potential mate?

    Which of each of the following do you find least attractive, overall, in a potential romantic partner?

    1. ExxJ, ExxP, IxxJ, IxxP
    2. xSTx, xNTx, xSFx, xNFx
    3. ESxx, ENxx, ISxx, INxx
    4. ExTx, ExFx, IxTx, IxFx
    5. xSxJ, xNxJ, xSxP, xNxP
    6. xxTJ, xxFJ, xxTP, xxFP

    Also state what you think your type and subtype are, if you'd like.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  2. #2
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SJ Definitely.

    Seems utterly boring.

  3. #3
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,739
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm not sure I have the experience to answer the question fully, but I guess I'd go with Ixxj. I enjoy people when they come at things from a different angle than I do (not to say that all Ixxj's do it the same way) yet we still seem to share some important things in common.

    That's an interesting question though, I'll have to give it some more thought.
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  4. #4
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For the record, I tend to think of quadra values as being the most significant aspect of Socionics, but I'm putting that aside, just for this thread.

    My answers, in order of least to most attractive:

    1. IxxP, ExxP, ExxJ, IxxJ
    2. xSTx, xNFx, xNTx, xSFx
    3. ESxx, ENxx, INxx, ISxx
    4. ExTx or ExFx, IxTx, IxFx
    5. xSxP or xNxP, xNxJ, xSxJ
    6. xxTP or xxFP, xxTJ, xxFJ
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    2,916
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I find Eps most attractive. IME
    INTp
    sx/sp

  6. #6
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hmmmm i go with a more functional/relational basis of attraction. like, for me, a semi-dual or an illusionary would be a much better romantic partner than an activity. so the order of attraction from most to least would be duality, illusionary, semiduality, activity, beneficiary, lookalike, mirror. but i could see a romantic relationship with any of these.

    these are tied for next-to-last: supervisor, supervisee, quasi, contrary, superego, comparative, benefactor. i can be friends with these people, though.

    and tada, last: conflict. respectful curiosity is about the best this can be.

    edit so i'll conform to the paramaters lol:

    least: IJ, TJ

    most: IP, SF, NF
    Last edited by Blaze; 01-15-2008 at 07:56 PM.

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  7. #7
    jessica129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,122
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IJ

  8. #8
    Suomea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    1,054
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    Which of each of the following do you find least attractive, overall, in a potential romantic partner?

    1. ExxJ, ExxP, IxxJ, IxxP
    2. xSTx, xNTx, xSFx, xNFx
    3. ESxx, ENxx, ISxx, INxx
    4. ExTx, ExFx, IxTx, IxFx
    5. xSxJ, xNxJ, xSxP, xNxP
    6. xxTJ, xxFJ, xxTP, xxFP

    Also state what you think your type and subtype are, if you'd like.
    1. IJ
    2. ST
    3. ES
    4. IT
    5. SJ
    6. TJ

    (This was pretty random and not with much reasoning)
    Suomea

  9. #9
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suomea View Post
    1. IJ
    2. ST
    3. ES
    4. IT
    5. SJ
    6. TJ

    (This was pretty random and not with much reasoning)
    Since when do "romance" and "reasoning" go together?

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this is an impossible distinction.

    actual characteristics of a person would be more useful in making this kind of distinction. attraction varies by person. who the hell knows if SJ or whatever is attractive or not if you don't have some actual person to compare it to?

  11. #11
    jessica129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,122
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    this is an impossible distinction.

    actual characteristics of a person would be more useful in making this kind of distinction. attraction varies by person. who the hell knows if SJ or whatever is attractive or not if you don't have some actual person to compare it to?
    If you can't form a basic idea of how a person behaves when it comes to socionics, then why are you even here to begin with?

  12. #12
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To tell us to die every 10 posts.

  13. #13
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Experience has taught me that as long as a person is female, single, reasonably attractive and reasonably intelligent, oh yes and of a similar age to me, unless I know that she's of a potentially conflicting sociotype in relation to mine (Fe EJ is about the only criterion that makes me decide a definite NO in this regard), then chances are I'll find her attractive. If any of the criteria above do not apply (yes, I know they're subjective, what else do you expect?) then obviously I won't. Aside from that though, I can't really make a distinction based upon the options in the original post. My apologies if this causes you great distress (not that I'd imagine it would).
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jessica129 View Post
    If you can't form a basic idea of how a person behaves when it comes to socionics, then why are you even here to begin with?
    i strongly object to the application of this question to this thread.

    we are being asked to tell whether we prefer SJs or EPs. exactly how the fuck are we supposed to make such a differentiation?

    you appear to have completely ignored my point about people being different.

    ESIs are extremely different from ESEs. ILEs are extremely different from SEEs. how does one determine if they would prefer {ILE, SLE, SEE, IEE} or {ESE, LSI, ESI, LSE} as entire sets rather than individual people or at least individual types?

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jessica129 View Post
    If you can't form a basic idea of how a person behaves when it comes to socionics, then why are you even here to begin with?
    ftr this is the kind of question that suggests to me that you are Ti. the preconceived notion here seems to be very oriented towards categorizing people into lots of little boxes rather than looking at the big picture.

    alone its not conclusive, but these things add up. but i digress, and i'm not really going to claim to know your type definitively but i will always have suspicions.

  16. #16
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,739
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    niff's got some points there
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  17. #17

    Default

    Wich one is the cheating money-sucking psycho-bitch lifedraining succubus? That one.
    ...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.

    INTp

  18. #18
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,750
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlord View Post
    Wich one is the cheating money-sucking psycho-bitch lifedraining succubus? That one.
    yeah, this is my conflictor, too.
    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  19. #19
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    Which of each of the following do you find least attractive, overall, in a potential romantic partner?

    1. ExxJ, ExxP, IxxJ, IxxP
    2. xSTx, xNTx, xSFx, xNFx
    3. ESxx, ENxx, ISxx, INxx
    4. ExTx, ExFx, IxTx, IxFx
    5. xSxJ, xNxJ, xSxP, xNxP
    6. xxTJ, xxFJ, xxTP, xxFP

    Also state what you think your type and subtype are, if you'd like.
    1. IxxJ > ExxJ
    2. um... I... um... I can't decide...
    3. either ISxx or INxx...
    4. IxTx > IxFx maybe
    5. xNxJ
    6. xxFJ or xxTJ

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlord View Post
    Wich one is the cheating money-sucking psycho-bitch lifedraining succubus? That one.
    that's the SEE, your alleged dual.

  21. #21
    Landlord of the Dog and Duck Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    EII-Ne Sp/So
    Posts
    14,935
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I find the whole thing impossible.

    And my type is...
    EII-Ne
    5w4 or 1w9 Sp/So

  22. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    that's the SEE, your alleged dual.
    So that's how you see your alleged duals?
    ...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.

    INTp

  23. #23

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlord View Post
    So that's how you see your alleged duals?
    i see my alleged duals as cheeseburgers.

  24. #24
    aka Slacker Slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North Korea
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    8,819
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy View Post
    Which of each of the following do you find least attractive, overall, in a potential romantic partner?

    1. ExxJ, ExxP, IxxJ, IxxP
    2. xSTx, xNTx, xSFx, xNFx
    3. ESxx, ENxx, ISxx, INxx
    4. ExTx, ExFx, IxTx, IxFx
    5. xSxJ, xNxJ, xSxP, xNxP
    6. xxTJ, xxFJ, xxTP, xxFP

    Also state what you think your type and subtype are, if you'd like.
    Hmmmm

    1. Ixxj
    2. xNTx
    3. ESxx
    4. ExFx
    5. xSxj
    6. xxTj

    I must say though that I didn't put a ton of thought into this.
    It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
    -Mark Twain


    You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.

  25. #25

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    854
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlord View Post
    Wich one is the cheating money-sucking psycho-bitch lifedraining succubus? That one.

    That's my ex-boyfriend. Yes, these people should have a type all their own, so we can know to stay away!
    Last edited by Christy B; 01-16-2008 at 01:35 AM.
    EII 4w5

    so/sx (?)

  26. #26
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The reason I started this thread is because of ST's. I mean, they can be awesome as friends, but I don't see anything about them that would make me want to be with one. LSI's are probably more attractive to me than any other ST type though.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  27. #27
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,626
    Mentioned
    156 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Most to least:

    IJ=IP=EP>EJ
    SF>NF>NT>ST
    ES=EN=IS=IN
    IF>EF>IT>ET
    SJ=NJ=SP=NP
    FP=FJ>TJ=TP

    which means that...ESTjs are those that I'd like least as partners. Matching.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  28. #28
    eunice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    TIM
    Ne-INFj
    Posts
    2,955
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Most attractive: Alpha NT

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •