Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: Enneagram & Socionics (in reply to machintruc)

  1. #1
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Enneagram & Socionics (in reply to machintruc)

    Right, ignoring all the bullshit about -phins, I'm going to lay out the correlations that I can REALLY see, the ones I'm think WHAT THE FUCK to, and everything in between. Seriously, I have no problem with you taking me up on any one of them. A) I practically want you to convince me I'm wrong and b) you can easily change my mind if you show me good enough evidence.


    (The image uploader is shit, so you're gonna have to click the bar at the top to put it back to its originally size in order to see the correlations properly.)

    Essentially, I'd be interested to hear from you if your Enneagram type and socionics type correlation I don't think it's "easy to see it work", or if I don't think it "could work".
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  2. #2
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So give me videos of dudes/girls or music or whatever that have such unusual correlations :

    ILE-8
    SEI-7
    LII-3
    LII-8
    ESE-4
    ESE-9
    SLE-1
    SLE-2
    LSI-5
    EIE-8
    SEE-1
    ESI-5
    SLI-7
    SLI-8
    LSE-5
    EII-3
    EII-9

  3. #3
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    So give me videos of dudes/girls or music or whatever that have such unusual correlations :

    ILE-8
    SEI-7
    LII-3
    LII-8
    ESE-4
    ESE-9
    SLE-1
    SLE-2
    LSI-5
    EIE-8
    SEE-1
    ESI-5
    SLI-7
    SLI-8
    LSE-5
    EII-3
    EII-9
    I haven't got firm evidence, because I don't put so much time and effort into these useless correlations; they're just fun to do. Why don't you find me videos of all of your supposed correlations? Things like an LSI Seven? I mean what the fuck?
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  4. #4
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    I haven't got firm evidence, because I don't put so much time and effort into these useless correlations; they're just fun to do. Why don't you find me videos of all of your supposed correlations? Things like an LSI Seven? I mean what the fuck?
    Things like an LII Eight ? What the f*** !? We aren't like those retarded pushy rednecks, us LII's are just cool and pacific as lambs.

  5. #5
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You're the biggest dickhead I've ever met.

    Forum award givers, give machintruc for being the biggest twat that ever existed.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  6. #6
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I found an LII-8 : it's me when I drink too much coffee.

    I found an LII-9 too : it's me when I'm drunk.

    I don't use amphetamines, so I didn't find an LII-7 yet.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    you're both stupid for assuming definite correlations, though if ezra changed all of the white spaces in his list to cyan, it would be fairly reasonable.

  8. #8
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    you're both stupid for assuming definite correlations, though if ezra changed all of the white spaces in his list to cyan, it would be fairly reasonable.
    Okay, from a philosophical point of view, perhaps that would make sense. Nothing is certain etc. I totally agree with you. However, for pragmatism's sake, I hardly think you'd find an SEI One. I'm willing to be £100 that if you went round every One in the world and asked them to study to find their socionics type, not one of them would say SEI.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  9. #9
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,481
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am a 2w3 myself, and I recall TheMime saying she's a 4w5?
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    one and SEI is not even a good example at all. i could easily see an SEI 1. frankly i could see almost any type as a one, although ILE might be a stretch.

    at any rate, i don't agree with you that no ILI in the world is a type 2, for example. the world has 6 billion people. one of them is an ILI 2.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    at any rate, i don't agree with you that no ILI in the world is a type 2, for example. the world has 6 billion people. one of them is an ILI 2.
    In that case it must be you. No other ILI would be so confused that he or she actually considered that possibility.

  12. #12
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    In that case it must be you. No other ILI would be so confused that he or she actually considered that possibility.
    I'm curious about to know what an ILI-2 actually resembles...

  13. #13
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    one and SEI is not even a good example at all. i could easily see an SEI 1. frankly i could see almost any type as a one, although ILE might be a stretch.
    How could you see an SEI One? For starters, what kind of One represents the IP temperament?

    at any rate, i don't agree with you that no ILI in the world is a type 2, for example. the world has 6 billion people. one of them is an ILI 2.
    And that's as dogmatic as my statement that none of them is an ILI Two. No Two would identify with the ILI. I bet you my life.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  14. #14
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    In that case it must be you. No other ILI would be so confused that he or she actually considered that possibility.
    I don't think you quite understand. It's called retaining the possibility that either possibility is a possibility.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    And that's as dogmatic as my statement that none of them is an ILI Two. No Two would identify with the ILI. I bet you my life.

    you lose. your execution is scheduled for tomorrow afternoon in hyde park.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    I don't think you quite understand. It's called retaining the possibility that either possibility is a possibility.
    I understand perfectly well. And so do you. You know that no ILI in the world -- dead, alive, or not yet born -- can ever be a 2. It is just as impossible as a squared circle.

  17. #17
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maybe an ILE may be a Two...

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    Maybe an ILE may be a Two...
    That is much more likely, since it is not totally impossible to imagine. But my guess is that no ILE in the world actually is a 2 either.

  19. #19
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    That is much more likely, since it is not totally impossible to imagine. But my guess is that no ILE in the world actually is a 2 either.
    They can be Nines or Sevens, then I think they can be Two.

    Twos are very friendly, and ILE's are too.

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    They can be Nines or Sevens, then I think they can be Two.
    They can be Sevens. It is much more doubtful if they can be Nines.

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    Twos are very friendly, and ILE's are too.
    Yes, many ILEs are friendly. But you don't need to be a Two to be friendly.

  21. #21
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    You don't need to be a Two to be friendly.
    No, but an extreme of friendliness would be an Intimate Two ESE

  22. #22

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    No, but an extreme of friendliness would be an Intimate Two ESE
    Yes, of course ... ...

  23. #23
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niffweed17 View Post
    you lose. your execution is scheduled for tomorrow afternoon in hyde park.


    ofgmz, teh spekttRs R aRRivd!!!!11
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  24. #24
    normal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    nil
    TIM
    nil
    Posts
    975
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ezra, SEI can be 9, that's what we all agree i guess, but they have no wings chance in you table. Neither 8 nor 1. So, what's the point?
    Can you explain it?

  25. #25
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by normal View Post
    Ezra, SEI can be 9, that's what we all agree i guess, but they have no wings chance in you table. Neither 8 nor 1. So, what's the point?
    Can you explain it?
    The table doesn't take wings into account. And just because a Nine that has an Eight wing can be an SEI, it doesn't mean an Eight can be an SEI.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  26. #26
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    The table doesn't take wings into account. And just because a Nine that has an Eight wing can be an SEI, it doesn't mean an Eight can be an SEI.
    I didn't think so for long, but now I changed my mind. Read this :

    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...d.php?p=293197

    If an ILE-9 exists, then an SEI-8 exists.

    Rick himself is IEE-9, therefore an SLI-8 exists too.

  27. #27

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    If an ILE-9 exists, then an SEI-8 exists.
    And since there certainly are no SEI-8s, there cannot be any ILE-9s either, if your premises are true.

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    Rick himself is IEE-9
    He is not. Rick is a 7.

  28. #28
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    He is not. Rick is a 7.
    How is him E7 rather than E9 ?

    Whatever... Maybe Etypes just don't dualise so. EIE-2 are frequent, why aren't LSI-5 ?

    http://socionist.blogspot.com/2007/0...st-man-in.html

    Is that LSI dude E5 ? I think he's E1... He's not energitic enough to be E8 or E3...

    Are EIE-2 actually in search of the LSI-1 perfectionist, or the LSI-3 achiever ? I don't really think they're in search for LSI-8, like an EIE-7 or an EIE-6 or even an EIE-3 may do.

    However, I hope Carla Bruni is EIE...
    Last edited by machintruc; 01-20-2008 at 06:29 AM.

  29. #29

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by machintruc View Post
    How is him E7 rather than E9?
    Why do you want to type Rick as E9? Why isn't he E7?

  30. #30
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,635
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Phaedrus is the right one in this topic.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  31. #31
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    I understand perfectly well. And so do you. You know that no ILI in the world -- dead, alive, or not yet born -- can ever be a 2. It is just as impossible as a squared circle.
    Right, Phaedrus, look at the difference between yours and niffweed's ways. Understand that there is definitely a difference of functional ordering here.

    He, no matter how fucking stupid the possibility, is retaining the possibility that there is a chance that it could go either way; there may be no ILI Twos, but there may be some. You are making your mind up about it, because you are confident that your view that there is no such thing as an ILI Two is correct. He will always retain a sense of doubt about things, because that is his way as an ILI. You will die for your belief that there isn't an ILI Two, because you have a certain dogmatism, as do I. We're both confident in our views, and niffweed is the quintessential philosopher; he refuses to believe something without absolute factual proof. Now, there's a slight difference in thought between me and you. I take niffweed's state of mind, and use your pragmatism. I retain a sense of doubt, but, like Hume, I "leave philosophy in the office", because it's there to be studied in my eyes, not lived (at least not until a conclusion about anything is reached e.g. we should live our lives x because of y). You, however, believe something firmly.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  32. #32
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    He is not. Rick is a 7.
    He did claim that, although IEEs can be Nines.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  33. #33
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ifmd95 View Post
    Beta values - that's my bet, too. But why not a sensor? (Perhaps Sarkozy's illusionary..)
    Because Bruni is too naïve to be a Sensor

  34. #34
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    He did claim that, although IEEs can be Nines.
    Extrotim Nines may think they're Sevens or Twos.

  35. #35
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ifmd95 View Post
    Although I think Sarkozy video-types ENTj, as I argued on Gamma. And the photographs of him with Bruni look plausibly ENTj-ISj - their facial expressions and poses, or so I think. (I actually thought Bruni VI-ed ISFj until reading her biographical infos. Her musical career I thought better fit ISFj Si functional descriptions than ISTj, too. But the behavior elsewhere...less so.)
    I still can't really imagine Sarkozy as Extrotim and/or Intuitive. Much of what he says is first-person, and he's got a "pragmatic" attitude to the world. Therefore ST rather than NT.

    Besides, I still haven't encountered any -like things in his speeches. Jean-Marie Le Pen (EIE) is -creative, and seems very confident in using . Sarkozy isn't. He can't be defined as "absent-minded" or such.

    Besides, according to Model Phi, he's S-N-D+. The D+ thing means that he has :

    - extroverted output system (D+)
    - introverted input and processing systems (S- and N-)

    D+ types usually use A LOT their outputting functions (i.e. strong functions). So he has to output LOTS of material to be LIE. He does output lots of material, but not of . Even Le Pen outputs more material, and he's S+N-D0.

    Therefore, I still think LSI rather than LIE, though LIE would be the least distant possibility after LSI.

  36. #36
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ifmd95 View Post
    Outside the interview I mentioned videotyping, I haven't found much spoken material in English (hence the emphasis so far on more subjective typing factors.) However, I remember other users commenting on how much Te Sarkozy used in debate with Royal. And visually it seems she used more Se in debate, more assertive with her arguments. Where as Sarkozy seemed more scattered in rattling off information, not unlike what I noted of him in the American interview. Royal has been typed ISTj - an ISTj that I think arguably uses less Te and more Se than Sarkozy. If they are identicles, no classical subtype would account for that difference, although him being ENTj would. (Perhaps your other models can rationalize their identicleness somehow - but I'm less familiar with those.)
    LIE's isn't as evident as LSI's. Hence "hidden" agenda.

    Do you have examples of his ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •