[glam]

.

[Kristiina]

sounds but with a lot of attention to weird things. Almost like definitions throughout the text. Like "Human thought"... Who cares that it's just our interpretation. It's not even clever and intuitive, it's just nitpicking. I just skipped that part without being able to keep focused on it. And the first paragraph sounds kinda EJ/IP > EP/IJ (dynamic>static).

But I'm confused by one thing. Half the time he actually makes a decent attempt to have a steady emotional vibe. He adds things like "wow", "anyway..." and adds questions that he doesn't want answered. Almost like he tries to write a text that is logical and clear, but can't help but try to create some emotion. He could actually be an Fe type who puts too much effort into Te. The emotional response parts seem the most natural.


This is actually pretty much what I whine about. Why do they make us memorize and learn something that doesn't even exist! But then I started to treat math like a fun puzzle that doesn't have "be real" and that solved the problem for me.

so at first glance gamma NT, but after thinking about it, he's probably Fe dominant who makes a pretty good impression of using Te.

[strrrng]

that writing is completely INxp. I am actually leaning towards INFp because of how he seems to just be generally going against logic, even though most of the attacks are on Ti, or people who have it as their base. it's a very Ni, dynamic, spiritual writing. somewhat generic, but still good.

[strrrng]

ENTj is also plausible. the writing does have a certain energy to it that you don't usually get from INTp's.

[strrrng]

yeah, most likely IP because of how he spoke of change in a way that suggested he liked it.

on the other hand, he sides against many forms of spiritual thought.

he didn't go against those schools of thought because he isn't spiritual. he went against them because they're dogmatic.

[Kristiina]

that would be consistent with the declarer trait (reinin/which gamma NT have.)

very true. Could be it.

On the other hand, I had Erkki (the INTp husband I keep mentioning) read it and he said it's very difficult to read for him. His writing is quite different. It was easier for me to read, although I didn't agree with most of the text.

[Kristiina]

ENTj extreme Ni-subtype would make sense with what I just said. I am ENFj extreme Ni subtype, so I'd have quite a lot in common with him. Temperament etc. His text could be easier for me to read compared with an INTp Te subtype.