Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 77

Thread: Types and sex

  1. #1
    Ver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    net
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    526
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Types and sex

    Do you think your sexual behaviour, attitude towards sex is somehow type-related? And what about fantasies? Is it like a guy who dreams about sex with his teacher is infantile and a guy who dreams a about an innocent school-girl is aggresive? And what about being a gay? Are some types more inclined to be gays that the other? From my own experience I can tell that I know some INFjs who are gays or bi. But they are too few to tell anything. I'd risk saying that T people are less inclined to that (don't know why and I am still not sure

  2. #2
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pauluch View Post
    Do you think your sexual behaviour, attitude towards sex is somehow type-related? And what about fantasies? Is it like a guy who dreams about sex with his teacher is infantile and a guy who dreams a about an innocent school-girl is aggresive? And what about being a gay? Are some types more inclined to be gays that the other? From my own experience I can tell that I know some INFjs who are gays or bi. But they are too few to tell anything. I'd risk saying that T people are less inclined to that (don't know why and I am still not sure
    There's the whole myth in MBTT about Feelers being women and if men, mainly gay, or at least feminine, and Thinkers being men and if women, mainly lesbians. This is bullshit, and no doubt some people will carry the same belief through into socionics.

    As for sexual behaviour, absolutely. The romantic styles are based on behaviour towards one's mate. Fantasies, however, I don't believe are incorporated into said styles. I think Aggressors can be fans of femdom, and Infantiles can think about boning some chick so hard she screams.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  3. #3
    jessica129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,122
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    All I know is it's my favorite past time

  4. #4
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,739
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    While I think type is correlated with sexual attitudes, Ezra is right to point out that the connection is not so stringent. Not to mention the stereotypical connotations which are associated all up in there.
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  5. #5
    liveandletlive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,290
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    im glad u mentioned this- for some reason i like being the victim during sex and all of my fantasies are with being the victim too. it remings me of the sex and the city episode where carrie asks, "could it be that what we don't like IRL, we love in sex?" i think there may be some truth to this in that thinking sex = lack of inhibition that during sex you let go of who you usually are. idk tho, who knows. like what would a caregiver be like during sex? maybe it's not necessarily type-related.
    ESFp-Fi sub
    6w7 sx/so/sp

  6. #6
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    There's the whole myth in MBTT about Feelers being women and if men, mainly gay, or at least feminine, and Thinkers being men and if women, mainly lesbians. This is bullshit, and no doubt some people will carry the same belief through into socionics.
    never heard of that myth...

  7. #7
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,167
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Okay, maybe not strictly in MBTT, but a woman Thinker would in society probably be seen as butch, and a male Feeler would be seen as a gay.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  8. #8
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think I'm victim in real life, sex and fantacies. Don't get the wrong idea here - I do have a lot of willpower and I do get a bit bossy every once in a while, and is also one part of being passionate, and valuing means I don't like slow "relaxing" atmosphere. But I am a victim because I expect the guy to be able to take the lead. I never have any fantacies about cute and gentle Casanova kind of guys. My taste is more to the side of Transporter (played by Jason Statham) or Riddick (played by Vin Diesel).
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  9. #9
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,635
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't feel like I show a real preference for the stereotypical victim or agressor roles as they are thought about. I'm not particularly aggressive IRL so I don't have pent up frustration to use in bed, but I'm not a pussy either. In bed thus depends on how I'm feeling at the moment, sometimes it's nice to take the lead and be very assertive, sometimes it's nice to let the girl do everything she wants with you.

    I prefer to be the initiator in terms of romantic relationships (probably due to my strong extraversion too), although I do need the girl to show interest in me afterwards, otherwise I tend to doubt it (but who doesn't need his-her partner to show interest??)
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA.
    TIM
    INTj
    Posts
    4,497
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ime, yes.

    i think i tend to fantasize about aggressors but its only fantasy. irl i respond to caregivers involuntarily.

  11. #11
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    im glad u mentioned this- for some reason i like being the victim during sex and all of my fantasies are with being the victim too. it remings me of the sex and the city episode where carrie asks, "could it be that what we don't like IRL, we love in sex?" i think there may be some truth to this in that thinking sex = lack of inhibition that during sex you let go of who you usually are. idk tho, who knows. like what would a caregiver be like during sex? maybe it's not necessarily type-related.
    hmmm well i guess that would not fit with your erotic attitude of aggressor. but in fantasies, even though you might be the "victim" you're really not. since anything and everything we can come up with in a fantasy is pretty much under our own mind control. so you can come up with fantasies that would never play in IRL the way you make them play out in your fantasy. like if a woman fantasized about having sex with two men she could make those men in her fantasy do whatever she wanted. IRL, i doubt things with two men would go down in a way that a woman really wanted. like, IRL, the men would bond and treat the woman badly. it def would not be all about her.

    I don't feel like I show a real preference for the stereotypical victim or agressor roles as they are thought about. I'm not particularly aggressive IRL so I don't have pent up frustration to use in bed, but I'm not a pussy either. In bed thus depends on how I'm feeling at the moment, sometimes it's nice to take the lead and be very assertive, sometimes it's nice to let the girl do everything she wants with you.

    I prefer to be the initiator in terms of romantic relationships (probably due to my strong extraversion too), although I do need the girl to show interest in me afterwards, otherwise I tend to doubt it (but who doesn't need his-her partner to show interest??)
    this sounds exactly like something my ex would say. yet more evidence of your SLE-ness.

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  12. #12
    Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Former USSR (global nomad)
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    2,050
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Male vs. female sexual behavior patterns probably differ more than sexual behavior among people of different types. Try to find a woman who isn't interested in being dominated to some degree.
    It is easier for the eye of a camel to pass through a rich man than for a needle to enter the kingdom of heaven.

  13. #13
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pauluch View Post
    Do you think your sexual behaviour, attitude towards sex is somehow type-related? And what about fantasies? Is it like a guy who dreams about sex with his teacher is infantile and a guy who dreams a about an innocent school-girl is aggresive? And what about being a gay? Are some types more inclined to be gays that the other? From my own experience I can tell that I know some INFjs who are gays or bi. But they are too few to tell anything. I'd risk saying that T people are less inclined to that (don't know why and I am still not sure
    Have you heard of Erotic Roles?
    http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Romance_styles
    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  14. #14
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    Male vs. female sexual behavior patterns probably differ more than sexual behavior among people of different types. Try to find a woman who isn't interested in being dominated to some degree.
    +1
    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  15. #15
    Suomea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    1,054
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    Male vs. female sexual behavior patterns probably differ more than sexual behavior among people of different types. Try to find a woman who isn't interested in being dominated to some degree.
    Hehe.....good thing I'm an Aggressor Infantile..... I wonder what being an Infantile Infantile is like for a man.
    Suomea

  16. #16
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    East Coast West Coast Dirty South
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,826
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Aggresor Infantile ? What is that supposed to mean?

    Pre-2013 post are written with incomplete understanding.

  17. #17
    Snomunegot munenori2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Kansas
    TIM
    Introvert sp/sx
    Posts
    7,739
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Suomea punches babies?
    Moonlight will fall
    Winter will end
    Harvest will come
    Your heart will mend

  18. #18
    Éminence grise mikemex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Third Planet
    TIM
    IEE-Ne
    Posts
    1,631
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I know:

    * Several infantes that dream about mature women.
    * One caregiver ESFj that likes sadom.
    * One infantile ENFp and homosexual that I suspect would had turned into homosexuality if he had understood his needs for affection earlier in life. He had an ISTj father who wasn't affective at all.
    * One caregiver ISFp who loves young men.
    * Two caregiver ESTj who loves young men.

    Make your own conclusions.
    [] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)

    You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life.
    - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.

  19. #19
    Mariano Rajoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, sex is type related. An argument could be made for everything being type related; see nation types, etc.

    As far as sex, my goal is make sure she reaches climax. Which means different behaviours, really. I try to accomodate except when it gets really weird, like with IEE and watersports, or ESxP and strangulation. Sometimes it is ok, but other times, not so much.
    LII
    that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.

  20. #20
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mariano Rajoy View Post
    I try to accomodate except when it gets really weird, like with IEE and watersports, or ESxP and strangulation. Sometimes it is ok, but other times, not so much.
    dag, dude, you've had some pretty kinkified experiences!

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  21. #21
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Strangle?! gao

  22. #22
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ooh yeah, nothing like my dual choking me to death in bed. Such a turn-on.

    Also lal@the idea of sexual fetishes being type-related. Ridiculousness has reached a new level.
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  23. #23
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, it kinda just seems like your thing is your thing, socionics be damned y'know?

  24. #24
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    aye. I think sometimes people can forget where Socionics ends and the rest of reality begins.
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  25. #25
    Mariano Rajoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sexual behavior is no more, nor no less explained by socionics as every other human behavior. Sexual behavior is not exempt purely on the basis of the behavior being sexual.
    LII
    that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.

  26. #26
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks, that made no fucking sense.

  27. #27
    Mariano Rajoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LokiVanguard View Post
    Thanks, that made no fucking sense.

    For example, the behavior of 'absent mindedness' is most likely attributed to one type, or one function. The same could be said of a sexual behavior, such as 'likes being restrained'.

    We all know that there is not a one to one correlation between socionic description and observation, but it becomes feasible to see different sexual proclivities from different types.

    The confusion really does beg the question, 'what is socionics, anyways?'.
    Last edited by Mariano Rajoy; 01-10-2008 at 08:26 PM.
    LII
    that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.

  28. #28

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA.
    TIM
    INTj
    Posts
    4,497
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    please use "beg the question" correctly. Sorry i am *this* close to strangling someone at work and people need to let of steam

  29. #29
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    As always I could be wrong with this, but as far as I see it, Socionics is one piece of the puzzle, not the puzzle itself.
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  30. #30
    Mariano Rajoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington View Post
    please use "beg the question" correctly. Sorry i am *this* close to strangling someone at work and people need to let of steam

    I don't see how specialized jargon from philosophy makes my usage incorrect.

    Anyhow, "The confusion really does beg the analytic, 'what is socionics, anyways?'."
    LII
    that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.

  31. #31
    Mariano Rajoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BLauritson View Post
    As always I could be wrong with this, but as far as I see it, Socionics is one piece of the puzzle, not the puzzle itself.
    Does sexual behavior lie outside of socionic discourse?
    LII
    that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.

  32. #32
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ah, thank you very much. Yes I totally agree, there is no one to one correlection between any one behavior and any one type. I just tend to see socionic types as people with "groups of behaviours"

  33. #33
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington View Post
    please use "beg the question" correctly. Sorry i am *this* close to strangling someone at work and people need to let of steam

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  34. #34
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mariano Rajoy View Post
    Does sexual behavior lie outside of socionic discourse?
    EDIT: Having had second thoughts about my tentative response, I'm going to await further clarification on what you mean exactly before giving a response to the question.
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  35. #35
    Mariano Rajoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BLauritson View Post
    Also lal@the idea of sexual fetishes being type-related. Ridiculousness has reached a new level.
    ?
    LII
    that is what i was getting at. if there is an inescapable appropriation that is required in the act of understanding, this brings into question the validity of socionics in describing what is real, and hence stubborn contradictions that continue to plague me.

  36. #36
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If by the question mark you desire clarification on that statement, I'm basically saying that I think sexual fetishes are completely unrelated to Socionics type. Rather I think they're down to the individual. Reminds me of a TV programme I watched a few years ago about a study done on bizarre sexual fetishes. One hypothesis proposed was that some sexual fetishes are actually related to childhood trauma and sexualising the trauma was the brain's way of coping with it. Though I can't remember any examples that fit that hypothesis (this was a few years ago), I remember one fetish they talked about:

    Basically it was a man who I think was in his 40s or 50s, had a family and a full-time job and I think he found life pretty stressful. One of his fantasies was that when he was having sex with a woman, her vagina would open up and swallow him whole. The psychologist who was presenting this show said that a possible explanation for this seemingly bizzare fetish is that because this man feels so burdened with the stresses of life, his fantasy was like going back into the mother's womb, free of responsibility and stress.

    The above is one reason (although not the only reason) why I don't think sexual fetishes are type-related.
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  37. #37
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ../
    Last edited by inumbra; 05-07-2015 at 01:19 AM.

  38. #38
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ver View Post
    Do you think your sexual behaviour, attitude towards sex is somehow type-related? And what about fantasies? Is it like a guy who dreams about sex with his teacher is infantile and a guy who dreams a about an innocent school-girl is aggresive? And what about being a gay? Are some types more inclined to be gays that the other? From my own experience I can tell that I know some INFjs who are gays or bi. But they are too few to tell anything. I'd risk saying that T people are less inclined to that (don't know why and I am still not sure
    if you dream zoophilia, yew Beta.
    teacher-student --- Infantile (but kinda aggressive, not a moron)
    gay dreams -- Delta (doesn't mean yew actually gay)
    bisexual -- Gamma Aggressors
    you just lie there and wanna be tied up with wax and blood -- Victim or Infantile (depends on the age of the other person)
    necrophilia --- Beta NF sp/sx
    orgy -- Beta Fe sx/so (only if you know where the whole group is going and yew all moan the same)
    rape -- Aggressor (Beta if you don't actually wanna)
    feather fetish -- Caregiver Alpha SF
    cum shot -- Decisive
    castration - Negativist
    premature ejaculation --. Delta NF
    orgadsm control - IJ
    voyeurism -- Infantile
    anal -- Te lead
    chastity -- Alpha SF
    needle play - Beta Rational duality
    priapism -- yew actually LSI sx/sp

  39. #39
    both sides, now wacey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Canada
    TIM
    9w8
    Posts
    3,288
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    haha, crazy creativity!
    "Traffic lights and loneliness. Paper cans and tape cassettes. When the world feels like this. Static shocks and bitterness."

  40. #40
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Add 'violent' to my type please.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •