Results 1 to 31 of 31

Thread: VI me

  1. #1
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default VI me

    I'm skeptical of the whole VI thing, but I'm curious, so give me a shot.
    Last edited by bibliophile8; 01-31-2008 at 03:06 AM. Reason: paranoia

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    2,916
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISTj?

  3. #3
    strrrng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    Ni-IEI 4w3 sx/so
    Posts
    8,781
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    def. Ti base...probably INTj.

  4. #4
    Don't forget the the thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    6,620
    Mentioned
    158 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Whoa, Gilligan. I think Ti ego is a good starting point. I would guess Alpha NT. The expression in the last one reminds me somewhat of myself.

  5. #5
    Suomea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    1,054
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Alpha NT is my guess. Leaning towards ENTp....: )
    Suomea

  6. #6
    from toronto with love ScarlettLux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    TIM
    Beta sx 3w4;7w8
    Posts
    3,401
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lsi


    Dress pretty, play dirty ღ
    Johari
    Nohari

  7. #7
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    When I first started into Socionics, I thought I was INTj. This may have been partially influenced by my earlier experience with MBTI. Then, after reading lots of wiki articles, I started to think I wasn't an intuitive type and I identify well with beta. But I like alpha, too. Whichever I am, I bet that I am Ti subtype since my creative function seems so weak.

    Ideas?

  8. #8
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    From that post alone, I see no Se at all. Why are people saying LSI?
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  9. #9
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carla View Post
    You've gotta be Ti ego. IxTj (or maybe ENTp).
    In essence, you're implying that he's an Alpha NT, but you're retaining the possibility of LSI.

    Could someone explain to me where the Se is?
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  10. #10
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Identity?
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  11. #11
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    Identity?
    I'm confused. You guys lost me.

    Quote Originally Posted by bibliophile8 View Post
    -I'm obsessed with understanding myself and how I work.
    Is that what you're referring to?

  12. #12
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh and I seriously doubt that I'm ENTp. I don't see how that is possible. I don't feel ENTp at all. Thanks for the compliment on my writing, though.

  13. #13
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You look to me. You seem to have some similarities with my INFj and my ENTp brothers (depends on the picture). And you look pretty intense but not really , so I think more extroverted than introverted maybe (but might depend on the selection of pictures). I also see something similar to Gilly, but his type is unknown. Overall I'd say ENTp, but I wouldn't be surprised if you were any other type.
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  14. #14
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carla View Post
    Don't know if you've read these, but will post for reference anyway.

    INTj: http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...itive_Introtim

    ISTj: http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?t...nsing_Introtim
    Thanks. I've read these about a million times. I don't know. It seems like I can interpret myself either way, though neither fit(s) perfectly, of course. I'll post more thoughts on that later.

    If it matters, I only knew I was being photographed in the last picture.

  15. #15
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Lightbulb

    Okay, now I'm starting to think that I actually am LII.

    Reasons I'm not a sensor:
    1. I have very little inclination for sports. I played some in high school, but only because my parents forced me to. I hated most of it.
    2. I've just realized that I'm not very good at keeping track of physical things. I carry pens through the house, arrive at my destination without it and wonder what I did with it.
    3. My brother (I think he's SLE) had an argument with my mom last night. He was yelling and making a scene out of it and all I could do was hope he didn't include me.
    4. My initiative sucks.

    Also, I somehow missed the wiki on Ne functions and its polr characteristics. I don't think it really bothers me if people talk about ability. I'm not sure if I am a good judge overall, but I don't mind if people discuss my ability, unless its obviously negative or hurtful. I do think the Se polr characteristics apply more to me.

  16. #16
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dee View Post
    anyway, i think ENTP~ESFJ>ISTJ>INTJ
    That makes no sense, dee.

    It should look more like this:

    ILE~LII > ESE > LSI.

    But even then, where do you see the Fe?
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  17. #17
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    That makes no sense, dee.
    I was thinking the same thing.
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  18. #18
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well, I guess that only an LII could work out what made sense in this forum and what didn't after 67 posts.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  19. #19
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra View Post
    Well, I guess that only an LII could work out what made sense in this forum and what didn't after 67 posts.
    Thanks. I've read a LOT of Wikisocion.
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  20. #20
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I see some James Franco in the second picture, which makes me think of Fabio, both of which make me think EP. His smile in the third one is a bit like mine, but also a bit like an EIE guy I know. The top picture looks more ILE. Alpha or Beta, at least.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  21. #21
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dee View Post
    don worry, it comes with experience
    Please elaborate. Not the experience part, the fact that there is Fe part.
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  22. #22
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd like to see some explanation for the experience part, too. Dee's only been here a few months.
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  23. #23
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So you just think I'm more Fe than Fi. That can only rule out gamma and delta. How does that just translate into ESE? What about T>F?
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  24. #24
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Okay, dee, now you've got me thinking. I suppose maybe I could be ESFj, with some serious, private, dual-seeking going on. I don't know. Whenever I take one of those profiling tests, I feel like I'm following a stereotype more than I'm revealing my own self. I feel lost. First, I thought I was INTj, then I went through a painful episode of thinking I was ISTj, now I think I might have to change again. I just want to know. Sorry, this was more of a rant than anything else and not really directed at you, dee. I have noticed that my writing online tends to be more Fe than I would expect. It sort of comes without me trying.

    Reading back over that, I do sound very ESE, don't I? Seeking an LII to provide me with ideology to direct my life and activities. Ugh.

    If I am EJ, I am certainly one of the quietest and probably loneliest.

    This post was hard to write.
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  25. #25
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Or maybe I could be ILE. It's strange to think of myself as an ekstravert...
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  26. #26
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    Thank you for your kind vote of confidence, Carla. I really appreciate it.

    Quote Originally Posted by dee View Post
    why don't you try the last test i posted, just be honest.
    I did, being as honest with myself as possible. No pretending. Here are my results:

    Alpha 12
    Beta 7
    Gamma 7
    Delta 5

    SF 7
    ST 7
    NF 6
    NT 10
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  27. #27
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Okay, LSI.
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  28. #28
    Don't forget the the thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    6,620
    Mentioned
    158 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't see any problems with INTj. Why ISTj?

  29. #29
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was thinking about how INTjs and ISTjs understand systems. INTjs don't need to see or experience the whole system to figure it out, whereas ISTjs, apparently, need to. I think I identify more with the latter than the former.

    ISTjs are supposed to make calculated assumptions, but isn't Ne a sort of calculated assumption in itself? That difference confuses me.
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

  30. #30
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd say INxx, from VI. You also remind me of Jonathan Ahdout.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  31. #31
    bibliophile8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ohio, one of those pesky 50 states
    Posts
    174
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dee View Post
    what, did you get LSI with the newer version? how new was the version? my files keep being updated all the time, but i don't have a way to see how accurate the results are, so i keep changing all the time just to see if i arrive at the algorithm that will output the results that really really make sense or something. check out the newest version, and don;t loose your old data.
    I got ISTj once and ESTp another time. I don't think I've tried your very latest test. btw, rmcnew's test gave me ISTj, then INTj, but I think it's still under construction.

    I'm going to post some self-revelatory rant/thoughts on life soon. My semester at college just started so I'm a lot busier than I was before.

    Also, I loved Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead. Some say that's almost a sure sign of beta-ness.
    type #33
    but maybe LSE, and maybe E3w4(p)

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    It's why you have a mana bar, not a rage bar.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •