I've been thinking about a possible switch mechanism for the plus-minus blocks of IxxJs within the framework of process/result dichotomy. This could provide an explanation for the HAs of IxxJs and their contrary types. So, given that we have:
- 4 transactional states for each block with producing Se or Ne
- child block dominance in aristocrats and parent block dominance in democrats
- Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem
The switching sequence still isn't completely clear, but if we take a look at process ("end-devolutionary" orientated) types — determination, resistance to sudden changes in the immediate environment, cyclicalism, redundancy of emotions, and hesitancy towards positively charged speculation — that gives us a place to start. What if emotion creating were produced by the Id block, not the Super-Id like Yermolaev supposed?
Idea: do analysis/collect factual data OR be content with existing system (emotion-creating aristocrats)
hmmm... That doesn't seem to fit with the child block dominance thing...
Ok, then maybe it's the contrary type whose HA acts together with the IxxJs' accepting Fi/Ti? That would mean that creating comfort is more important for these types than consuming resources.
Another idea: if you combine +Ne in the same transaction ring with -Si, then you have the child block ordering reversed for Delta aristocrats, but they would stay the same for Beta aristocrats... which could be related to process/result as well. Maybe they are independent after all. At least it's a good way for identifying evolutionary types through the adult block. What do you think?