Last edited by Dee; 02-26-2009 at 02:14 AM.
Jung wrote on this in-depth.... In fact, he devoted an entire paper just to the study of extroversion vs introversion. But yes those are quite accurate descriptions.
This is what psychic domain theory is beginning to explore: if we have different ideas about how an element manifests (even independent of sign) then we will disagree about it. Understanding the differences between our projected manifestations illuminates the nature of the divides between us.
Originally Posted by jxrtes
Labcoat and I think about this regularly, and Gilly, too. (though he may not admit it.) What labcoat and I have concluded can be seen in this thread:
We also have a Wikisocion page devoted to it.
Lately I've begun to speculate that political "leanings" are in fact yet another dichotomous type phenomenon.
this is pretty much the definition of introverted vs. extraverted elements in that in introverted elements you are experiencing them as an object vs. experiencing them as a subject with extraverted elements.
im not big on the terminology but i guess i should further explain myself because i can see it going both ways on how i described them. in introverted elements, you are experiencing them with yourself as the focal point- how it feels, what it does, etc. vs. in extraverted elements, they are triggered by external events- what's going on around you, etc.
Originally Posted by dee