-
-
Last edited by Dee; 02-26-2009 at 02:16 AM.
i'm pretty sure we're conflictors or of some other extremely disagreeable type relation, if that helps at all.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
.
jesus, i've had far more productive conversations with gilligan/blaze/hkkmr/slava/elro/whoever else is claiming ENTp. what's sad to me is that a lot of the time he's pretty much flat out wrong or dealing with a complete misunderstanding. add to being as confused and looney as a fruitcake, i just refuse to communicate or even try to explain jack shit to him. if your ex-husband was like this, i'm awfully sorry!Originally Posted by Diana
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
.
that's so bad it's good!Now - post brain injury, yeah, he's more like dee.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Wow.
.
perhaps, Dee is my identical. So there's a good point towards SEI.
i agree that an ISFp probably wouldn't be nearly as verbose or doing the sort of impulsive, EP scanning, lots of explosions like EP-Ne can have, bla bla. i could honestly see an ISFp dealing with him very easily and being far more patient with some of this absolutely ridiculous, half thought out crap.
you could probably fairly easily apply to dee to this: entp-isfp duality
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I see a Ti hidden agenda about
_
_
big
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
dee reminds me of XoX. i'd also agree on the v.i. of ENTp. (just went and did a search for his first type thread.)
why doesn't someone help the poor man and Ti him up?
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
His off the wall, completely schizotypal connections and understanding between things is Ti? Wth? Or are you saying he needs Ti to structure it?
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
i'm not sure if he needs Ti to structure it or some ISFp to hand him a sandwich. right now i tend to stick with the former, seeing close to zero Ti here. although ifmd's explanation is pretty convincing.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I always see an INFp hidden agenda manifesting itself by an INFp acting like they understand everything while providing very little support for it, and simply rationalize everything that others criticize about their understanding ad hoc.
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
ISFp would explain the multiple tiny posts everywhere!When dee thinks of something, he posts it immidiately, when he thinks of something else, he posts again. Sometimes 3 or 4 posts in a row, each saying one sentence!!! At the same time, when I decipher the meaning of the posts, I sometimes really agree and sometimes think, "wow, cool! I wouldn't have realized that, but you're right!". Usually the tiny posts are too erratic for me to read so I skip them.
EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
E3 (probably 3w4)
Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!
Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/
If there's anything to socionics he gotta be dynamic. Sounds also synergistic positivist. I go with ESFj.
Frankly I don't have any problem understanding what he says. He's just testing hypothesis, and discarding them if they don't work.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
ISFp > ESFj/ENTp
INTp
sx/sp
xFxp
SEI. Similar behavior to some IEIs here, but without the Beta edge.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
No.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
ISFp gets this SiFe plan for the improving of its environment. ISFp needs to rationalize it in intellectual terms to win NeTi interest in elaborating upon it.
SEE Unknown Subtype
6w7 sx/so
[21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
[21:29] hitta: and not dying
.
Again with these posts? oh god.
Yeah, I think they're way too high energy for ya. Um... your type... Can't really say without looking at a lot of your past posts. So if i'm bored or have a lot of time this sunday I'll give it a shot.
You're an interesting character, dee.
Whenever offered with suggestions, or whenever you find remotely conclusive evidence, you seem to disregard it as if you're playing some kind of a game, or as if you want to keep your options open. In my eyes, there is far too much flexibility in you. I would hence eliminate IJ and EJ types as those potential for yourself. As you've just explained, there is a problem with IP.
Now, I myself see a lot of Ne in you. Your continuous churning out of various threads about socionics is most likely a result of Ne and Ti. I retain the belief that you are ILE-Ne, and see no reason to doubt it. You fit the temperament and the club, and the functions don't contradict your behaviour.
For those that see SEI or (I know for certain in Expat's case) IEI, I don't understand why. I'd like it if someone explained it to me.
lol @ irony
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
In my opinion dee is socially more initiative taking than I am. He also seems to take a more personal (Fi?) approach. His style of establishing personal contact reminds me of Traveler or anndelise a bit. I might be wrong though but I sense he very naturally closes the psychological distance between himself and other people and controls that distance. This is different from me as I tend to keep a relatively long and impersonal psychological distance which can alter rather chaotically to very close and back to distant. His sense of self and identity also seems stronger. He IS dee. XoX is more like a continuously changing facet. Correct me if I am wrong dee.
come on Dee. If you want to be 'special' then just invent a type for you.
You are my identical, and that's all. You are SEI. I have the same reason to doubt, but in my case i accept that i can be SEI. My question is: If you are really sure what function YOU HAVE and valued, then why in hell are you asking about your type? if you are throwing out all your fact here, and a lot of people see you as a SEI, then why you argument that you ARE NOT SEI. Come on dude, i don't know if i understanding well this situation, but i clearly see you dont accepting your type (because clearly you cant accept the truth or at least, you dont want to be SEI-ESE).
Weak Ti for you. And die.
.
No. I dont feel offended. It is just that the 'reasons' that you give to us, describes to my eyes your weak Ti. Probably, you are INFp or ISFp. You HAVE the fact, but you are not able to 'decide' or see which type really describe you better. You are unsure about what is your type even when you give us an argument saying why you are not a SEI. Something similar occurs to enneagram 4. They want to be someone. They are not sure what they are, but they are really sure about what they aren't and that is the problem. You want to know your type and give us a lot of information of your own, but you aren't sure about your own information what type describes you better.
If you are soooo sure about your function, then why do you ask? That's why i saying all this stuff.
Anyway, You know yourself better than us. I put my money to SEI.
I related that with myself. Don't worry. :wink:
I said enough. I don't want to start a discussion here Dee. And of course, i don't want make you feel bad.
I'm SEI because people here type me like that. And you know what Dee? even if i were ILI, SEI, IEI, whatever, i try not to take this so deep in my life. The important is not who you are or what you are. Sorry if this bothers you so. It wasnt my intention.
Anyway, back to the thread. I still putting my money to SEI.
Anyway, back to the threat. I still putting my money to SEI.
lolAnyway, back to the threat. I still putting my money to SEI.
I'd say that was preference for Ti over Te. Alpha or Beta. That does not contradict my ILE typing.not exactly for this one. the thing is that i am confident that some people are either biased, hate me and use some stupid type to just keep bugging me, don't know enough about me, close their minds after making an initial conclusion based on no material at all, don't know or understand properly/enough of socionics, etc. and so i am only seriously considering/willing to engage in analysis with people who are interested, know what they are talking about, are unbiased, do not close their minds, etc.
Have a go at providing evidence, no matter how hard it is for you. Otherwise, in this conversation, you are useless.
Evidence. Currently, it seems as if people are simply throwing this SEI typing around.
dee, I would not rule out the possibility of IEE, especially after our PM talk.
If you decide not to alter your behavior, you cannot complain about what it gets you.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
you can take most tests and, with a little awareness of the tests' formats, score whatever you want. it seems that you have reported a wide variety of test results, which leads me to believe you have a fluctuating perception of your core personality and tend to answer according to your present whim/conviction.
to avoid this, perhaps you should take a break from testing, even a break from conscious analysis of your personality, and watch something more viable emerge.
ime, if you want to start with the facts, you can't start with announcing that you are x, y, z, especially when you've shown that your x, y, z are not clearly defined. you seem to have weak grasp of fact versus fiction, which amounts to little understanding of what can be used as evidence and what cannot, etc....
you seem to be one who agrees with any information that sounds right at the time. i don't think Ti is your primary weakness, but Te. I see you trying to analyze complicated ideas with no axioms, no factual basis. you like <, > signs, but i can't make sense of wtf is on either side of the signs or what brilliant relationship you are trying to muster. its as if you're studying a number line with no (0,0) origin.
whenever the dog and i see each other we both stop where we are. we regard each other with a mixture of sadness and suspicion and then we feign indifference.
Jerry, The Zoo Story by Edward Albee
Yes, you have had and still are getting plenty of chances. The thing is, you're simply not moving out into the danger zone and embracing the facts that are laid out in front of you. These people you say are out to trick or annoy you actually are offering good advice. Many may have given up on you now, for the simple fact that you do not accept what they say as genuine. And have you taken nothing on board that I myself have said? Do you not understand Ti/Fe or Te/Fi, Se/Ni or Ne/Si? If you're having trouble finding which one you apply most in life, talk to us. We'll be able to help you define what you use, and what you don't. We only have a very basic picture of you, and what you tell us on the forum. Some of it may be grossly inaccurate. Only you can aid that in any way. Right now, you're not helping by flittering around in a fickle fashion. Centre yourself, stop doing tests, and start to learn. Start to take in. Start to apply yourself. This is the only way you're going to able to find your type.
+1 :wink:Yes, you have had and still are getting plenty of chances. The thing is, you're simply not moving out into the danger zone and embracing the facts that are laid out in front of you. These people you say are out to trick or annoy you actually are offering good advice. Many may have given up on you now, for the simple fact that you do not accept what they say as genuine. And have you taken nothing on board that I myself have said? Do you not understand Ti/Fe or Te/Fi, Se/Ni or Ne/Si? If you're having trouble finding which one you apply most in life, talk to us. We'll be able to help you define what you use, and what you don't. We only have a very basic picture of you, and what you tell us on the forum. Some of it may be grossly inaccurate. Only you can aid that in any way. Right now, you're not helping by flittering around in a fickle fashion. Centre yourself, stop doing tests, and start to learn. Start to take in. Start to apply yourself. This is the only way you're going to able to find your type.
Right, it's clear that you've been reading a lot. You have a lot of information. You just need to decide now. Let's try process of elimination. Let's start with those functions which you do NOT value. I don't care whether things don't click into place for now; let's concentrate on getting somewhere.
So, think about it carefully, and write down those functions you don't value.
Reply With Quote
