Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: gross over simplification of information aspects/elements

  1. #1
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default gross over simplification of information aspects/elements

    This is just a random idea that I haven't put a whole lot of thought into yet... I'm not suggesting these are good definitions/descriptions. Consider yourself warned.

    Te: what people/things are doing
    Fe: how people/things are feeling

    Si: what people/things are doing with each other
    Ni: what people/things have, will, or could be doing with each other

    Se: the existing characteristics of people/things
    Ne: the potential characteristics of people/things

    Ti: what people/things are in relation to each other
    Fi: how people/things feel in relation to each other
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  2. #2
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: gross over simplification of information aspects/element

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    Si: what people/things are doing with each other
    That's the most problematic one, I think.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  3. #3
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Si: How things are physically affecting one another
    Ni: How events precipitate new events (this has always been the hard one, hasn't it?)
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,967
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For a while I've been considering things under labcoat's approach of defining the elements by their relations to their opposites. It seems to me that if traffics , then should rely on for its data. Taking the memories of observed objects and their energies into consideration, acts as a sort of simulation program that puts all of those objects in the same make-believe environment and moves them forward in time under various assumptions and scenarios. That's my definition of for now.

    You could probably make the same case for as a processor of . If you think of things as "belonging" somewhere or another and yet not actually in their places, then with you can imagine what the world would be like if they were in their places as such. (I remember you said something about this relationship, labcoat, but I don't remember what exactly. I'm pretty sure I came up with the = world where everything is in its place (or not in its place in the negative form) on my own though.)

    Using hitta's +/- view, an ENTp w/- would "be open to" doomsday possibilities, and draw conclusions as to the proper course of action from them, creating a system that can guide the unfilled needs to pasture.

    (Err wait... heh that should be ENFp drawing positive feeling vibes that they can "do something" to make things better, heh. Oh oops, ah discussed the pathological ENTp form instead!)

  5. #5
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    Si: How things are physically affecting one another
    How about: Si: How people/things are physically affecting one another?

    Ni: How events precipitate new events (this has always been the hard one, hasn't it?)
    The hard one to state simply and yet explain well? Yes.

    Si and Ni were particularly difficult in this topic because of the format.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  6. #6
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,406
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: gross over simplification of information aspects/element

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat
    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    Si: what people/things are doing with each other
    That's the most problematic one, I think.
    Yeah, that description just sounds...naughty.
    "Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
    Johari Box

  7. #7
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Si: physical processes that take place and how they're related to each other
    Ni: abstract processes that take place and how they're related to each other
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,967
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    Si: physical processes that take place and how they're related to each other
    Ni: abstract processes that take place and how they're related to each other
    OK, those we can work with. Although it's not entirely clear what's meant by "physical" and "abstract".

  9. #9
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tcaudilllg
    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    Si: physical processes that take place and how they're related to each other
    Ni: abstract processes that take place and how they're related to each other
    OK, those we can work with. Although it's not entirely clear what's meant by "physical" and "abstract".
    I agree. But I think it's fairly obvious what they mean. By physical is meant those which are concrete and related to the body. For a simplistic example, as I am sat here at my laptop, say I felt a pain in my back, and thought 'that is related to the fact that my posture is shit', that is a use Si. It is physical. An example of an abstract process would be, for example, a conspiracy theorist connecting the 9/11 incident (concrete) to the Illuminati (more abstract) to a secret organisation planning onworld domination (very abstract) being controlled by an alien race (pointlessly abstract). Take Ron L. Hubbard and Scientology. Although tainted by Te (he's cited as an LIE), can you imagine a Si leading or secondary coming up with that? No. It's evidently the work of someone who is strong in and who values Ni.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •