This started from hitta's ENTj thread, but it seems maybe it deserves a thread of its own. Here we've been debating, sometimes contentiously, hitta's views. Many people have suggested either that hitta is a deranged madman who is completely distorting Socionics, or else a creative Socionics genius.
But it turns out that most of what says isn't really that original or different. It's merely deductions based on the functions as posted on http://www.the16types.info.
Where do these come from, are directly from Gulenko, and in any case, are they to be taken seriously at all?
Originally Posted by hittaOriginally Posted by Jonathan