Customizing dichotomies

[Hugo]

A number of Model A descriptions have arisen that describe all the functions for each type in a customized way. For example Se will be described for each type in a way that is unique to each of those types. In the end there would be 16 unique Se descriptions, one for each type.

I believe the same may be possible with dichotomies. In the end there would be 30 components to each type descriptions based solely on dichotomies.

[Gilly]

If you really want to totally flesh out a type, then relate each of its specific functional blocks to each dichotomy. Not sure if you're wanting to go that far although you could make some pretty amazing behavior trackers. But hey, if you understand the dichotomies, the functions, and Model A, you don't even need those descriptions.

[Hugo]

If you really want to totally flesh out a type, then relate each of its specific functional blocks to each dichotomy. Not sure if you're wanting to go that far although you could make some pretty amazing behavior trackers.

Maybe you could give it a try, at least for your type.

It's difficult for me to appreciate what you are saying without an example.

[Not A Communist Shill]

A number of Model A descriptions have arisen that describe all the functions for each type in a customized way. For example Se will be described for each type in a way that is unique to each of those types. In the end there would be 16 unique Se descriptions, one for each type.

I would like someone to do a test involving all these function descriptions .

[Not A Communist Shill]

A number of Model A descriptions have arisen that describe all the functions for each type in a customized way. For example Se will be described for each type in a way that is unique to each of those types. In the end there would be 16 unique Se descriptions, one for each type.

I would like someone to do a test involving all these function descriptions .

Don't make me kill you!

O.K...I'm sorry...I'd rather be murdered by someone who loves me, anyhow.