Results 1 to 31 of 31

Thread: A Declaration

  1. #1
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default A Declaration

    1. There are no LSEs on this forum - they would find personality theories far from interesting. They are doers, not thinkers. They would find socionics to be a waste of time.

    2. The only SLEs on this forum are those who joke around and arouse arguments and laughter in people. No SLE would drag out an extended personality theory in writing, carefully and methodically.

    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.

    I challenge you to challenge any one of my statements. I'll ignore and disregard them if you don't back them up with why my statements are incorrect.

  2. #2
    Creepy-bg

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.
    - those who are here generally to fuck around or talk with people they've become friends with and whose interrest in socionics has become secondary.

  3. #3
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,709
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't challenge you on anything. It seems the majority of the posts are dominated by those that you mentioned.

    Bionic goat, I am one of the minorities now (again!) <high5>

  4. #4
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
    - those who are here generally to fuck around or talk with people they've become friends with and whose interrest in socionics has become secondary.
    True. STs and SFs. But they're much rarer than the aforementioned. Hence, they do not belong to that statement.

  5. #5
    aut0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    404
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hm I guess I don't exist then, lets see:

    I'm extremely healthy - Check
    I work out 7 days a week - Check
    I work on my car/play sports for fun - Check
    I go to school full time - Check
    I'm fucking damn good looking - Check (This should probably be up first )


    I find use in socionics because its helped me to understand why I didn't get along with people in my past, and can help in dealing with people in the future.

    You = retarded.

    I will give you this though, I have so much time to post on the forums because I don't have a job right now, and since I don't have a job I refuse to let myself date, therefore plenty of free time to argue on the internets

  6. #6
    Landlord of the Dog and Duck Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    EII-Ne Sp/So
    Posts
    14,931
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.
    - those who are here generally to fuck around or talk with people they've become friends with and whose interrest in socionics has become secondary.
    - Subterranean
    EII-Ne
    5w4 or 1w9 Sp/So

  7. #7
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Clearly people didn't take note of this:

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people
    So go fuck yourself aut0. It seems the true retard is the one who doesn't read.

  8. #8
    aut0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    404
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You insinuated that every person here was a complete loser, would you like to back up your claim by posting a pic of yourself? You obviously seem to think that you're an SLE


  9. #9
    aut0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    404
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm playing Macho man in my head while I await your pic

  10. #10
    snegledmaca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,900
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.

    I challenge you to challenge any one of my statements. I'll ignore and disregard them if you don't back them up with why my statements are incorrect.
    Well, misutii translated the filatova articles and I have translated the article about reinin's attributes. I also have some personal theories about socionics but I don't post them (With one exception) because they are incomplete. And kioshi regularly voices his theories. Your association with the divisions are wrong.

  11. #11
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aut0
    You insinuated that every person here was a complete loser, would you like to back up your claim by posting a pic of yourself? You obviously seem to think that you're an SLE

    I'm surprised you haven't noticed the thread.

    http://the16types.info/forums/viewto...longest+thread

    http://the16types.info/forums/viewto...hread&start=75

    They're not very up to date. If you have a facebook account, you can see these too:

    http://www.facebook.com/photo_search...1&id=627218507

    Also, please note that I do not think I'm an SLE - half this forum does. The other half scoffs at the way I portray myself as a macho tough guy. I think LSE and LIE are equally likely possibilities.

  12. #12
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aut0
    You insinuated that every person here was a complete loser
    I don't remember making that claim. Please quote me.

    Quote Originally Posted by aut0 laughed nervously and

  13. #13
    Creepy-bg

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by snegledmaca
    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.

    I challenge you to challenge any one of my statements. I'll ignore and disregard them if you don't back them up with why my statements are incorrect.
    Well, misutii translated the filatova articles and I have translated the article about reinin's attributes. I also have some personal theories about socionics but I don't post them (With one exception) because they are incomplete. And kioshi regularly voices his theories. Your association with the divisions are wrong.
    just to screw with the legitamacy of this guys statements... I've also done my share of translating too.

  14. #14
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.

    I challenge you to challenge any one of my statements. I'll ignore and disregard them if you don't back them up with why my statements are incorrect.
    I have a few to add:

    -People who LOVE to talk about themselves
    -People who are seeking intellectual stimulation
    -People who value either Ne or Ni

  15. #15
    Creepy-bg

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    What about people who LOVE to talk about themselves?
    yeah, like Joy

  16. #16
    aut0's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    404
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    Quote Originally Posted by aut0
    You insinuated that every person here was a complete loser
    I don't remember making that claim. Please quote me.

    Quote Originally Posted by aut0 laughed nervously and
    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    1. There are no LSEs on this forum - they would find personality theories far from interesting. They are doers, not thinkers. They would find socionics to be a waste of time.

    2. The only SLEs on this forum are those who joke around and arouse arguments and laughter in people. No SLE would drag out an extended personality theory in writing, carefully and methodically.

    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.

    I challenge you to challenge any one of my statements. I'll ignore and disregard them if you don't back them up with why my statements are incorrect.
    Quote Originally Posted by aut0
    Hm I guess I don't exist then, lets see:

    I'm extremely healthy - Check
    I work out 7 days a week - Check
    I work on my car/play sports for fun - Check
    I go to school full time - Check
    I'm fucking damn good looking - Check (This should probably be up first )


    I find use in socionics because its helped me to understand why I didn't get along with people in my past, and can help in dealing with people in the future.

    You = retarded.

    I will give you this though, I have so much time to post on the forums because I don't have a job right now, and since I don't have a job I refuse to let myself date, therefore plenty of free time to argue on the internets
    My fault you didn't accuse everyone of being a loser, you just accused me of being a loser, considering if LSE is my type than I must be some half-wit that mistakingly figured out how to use the interwebs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    Quote Originally Posted by aut0
    You insinuated that every person here was a complete loser, would you like to back up your claim by posting a pic of yourself? You obviously seem to think that you're an SLE

    I'm surprised you haven't noticed the thread.

    http://the16types.info/forums/viewto...longest+thread

    http://the16types.info/forums/viewto...hread&start=75

    They're not very up to date. If you have a facebook account, you can see these too:

    http://www.facebook.com/photo_search...1&id=627218507

    Also, please note that I do not think I'm an SLE - half this forum does. The other half scoffs at the way I portray myself as a macho tough guy. I think LSE and LIE are equally likely possibilities.
    Sorry, I'm allergic to threads over 90 pages. You = ISTJ, but I don't even think I'm going to go beyond this, when I imagine a conversation with you I imagine talking to a brick wall, or see a dog chasing its tail.

    This sentence works too: The purpose of this sentence is to explain the purpose of this sentence.

  17. #17
    detail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    483
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The two kinds of people you are referring to are actually two different ways of interacting on the forums that are used by people regardless of their clubs. I figure providing examples will be useless because you will call them exceptions, based on what you answered to others thus far so i will say read the forums (You will see that NFs also contributed a lot to the theory and translation and that NTs are using the intertype relations system probably as much as the NFs do). The use of "primarily" also serves you to use the same concept pointed out in the Sorites paradox, in this case: When does an exception ceases to be an exception?.

    The main flaw in your reasoning is that you establish a one to one direct correlation with one behavior and one person, when actually most users on this forum have more than one motive. Take for example the subforum "Anything Goes". It contains approximatively 40% more posts than the second subforum with the most posts. If people who joke around are a minority, then who is responsible for as much as ~25% of the total posts on the whole forums? One could argue that posts on "Anything Goes" take less time to write but we're still talking about over 70000 posts which means ~40% more than in the "General Discussion" section. To ensure that my memory wasn't playing tricks on me, i paid a little visite to the aforementioned subforum and saw that many of the posts were signed by users who belong to the NF and NT clubs. In case you don't believe me, you can always look up for yourself. Now you could still use a cheap debate tactic and tell me "Hey, i said they are interested by X or Z part of socionics, not that they weren't fooling around LOL" but your reply to Bionicgoat indicated that you associate this behavior exclusively to a minority of STs and SFs who don't belong to the statement #3.


    So i guess we could summarize your mistakes this way:

    -You assume a direct 1-1 correlation between one behavior and one person. (And most probably between one part of the socionics theory and one person)
    -You create a relationship of mutual exclusiveness between two different behaviors.
    -It leads you to believe that actions in themselves are "kinds of people" that are mutually exclusive.
    -You dissociate from pre-categorized people actions that go into another direction than the one you associated them with.
    -You associate these with another group that consists of a minority.
    -You argue against reality based on the rules of your system instead of the rules of reality, such as the evidence found on the forums that i provided here, using the vagueness of your initial claims to adjust your system so that it fits reality when argued.

  18. #18
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,624
    Mentioned
    155 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    1. There are no LSEs on this forum - they would find personality theories far from interesting. They are doers, not thinkers. They would find socionics to be a waste of time.

    2. The only SLEs on this forum are those who joke around and arouse arguments and laughter in people. No SLE would drag out an extended personality theory in writing, carefully and methodically.

    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.

    I challenge you to challenge any one of my statements. I'll ignore and disregard them if you don't back them up with why my statements are incorrect.
    A declaration? Hell Abram Lincoln
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  19. #19
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    -People who LOVE to talk about themselves
    SFs and Betas.

    -People who are seeking intellectual stimulation
    NTs. They are already accounted for.

    -People who value either Ne or Ni
    ?

  20. #20
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    What about people who LOVE to talk about themselves?
    yeah, like Joy
    I'm pretty sure Joy didn't actually say that.

  21. #21
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by detail
    Now you could still use a cheap debate tactic and tell me "Hey, i said they are interested by X or Z part of socionics, not that they weren't fooling around LOL" but your reply to Bionicgoat indicated that you associate this behavior exclusively to a minority of STs and SFs who don't belong to the statement #3.
    Can't remember who it was, but someone once said that this forum was essentially an NT fest. This was to prove his point that there is a lack of sensers on this forum.

  22. #22
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    -People who LOVE to talk about themselves
    SFs and Betas.
    And extroverts and... I don't know, I think just about any type could fall into this category. I also think that people who are seeking self-discovery (especially extroverts) are likely to enjoy talking about themselves.

    As a general rule in dealing with people, the more you can get people to talk about themselves or their interests, the more they'll like you. The best way to win friends or people's loyalty or business is to make them feel important, generally by taking an interest in them and the things that interest them.

    -People who are seeking intellectual stimulation
    NTs. They are already accounted for.
    No. Any and every intelligent person will seek intellectual stimulation if they are not in frequent contact with other highly intelligent people who are compatible enough to stimulate them.

    In other words, intelligent people of any type.

    -People who value either Ne or Ni
    ?
    Otherwise known as "everyone".

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    Quote Originally Posted by Bionicgoat
    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    What about people who LOVE to talk about themselves?
    yeah, like Joy
    I'm pretty sure Joy didn't actually say that.
    I said that before the edit.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  23. #23
    detail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    483
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    someone once said that this forum was essentially an NT fest. This was to prove his point that there is a lack of sensers on this forum.
    Yes there are many *NT*s, more than *S**s but it is in itself a useless piece of information and it doesn't even come close to be similar in form to your first post in this thread, which was erroneous. If your first post is what you refer to as a proof, i have to object for the reasons stated in my reply.

  24. #24

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    1. There are no LSEs on this forum - they would find personality theories far from interesting. They are doers, not thinkers. They would find socionics to be a waste of time.

    2. The only SLEs on this forum are those who joke around and arouse arguments and laughter in people. No SLE would drag out an extended personality theory in writing, carefully and methodically.

    3. This forum is populated primarily by two kinds of people:

    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.

    I challenge you to challenge any one of my statements. I'll ignore and disregard them if you don't back them up with why my statements are incorrect.
    your assertions are based on stereotype and Ti-related bullshit. you are ignoring the very obvious situations that there are some sensory types here whose types are widely agreed upon. of course we could be wrong, but if you claim that we're wrong for every single person simply because "it shouldnt work that way," then you're an idiot who is being extremely naive, stereotypical, and ignorant of the reality right in front of him.

  25. #25

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,101
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by Bionicgoat

    - those who are here generally to fuck around or talk with people they've become friends with and whose interrest in socionics has become secondary.
    I'm part of this party crowd.

  26. #26

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    992
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by dee

    cracka is one. i think. he just feels so much as an ESTj i know who i think is ESTj because he talks always about Te stuff and Si stuff, is logical, and is not an SLI. he also looks like an ESTj (mix of al pacino and van damme). if you read cracka on the forum, he always talks of Te, is very comfy (Si), but does not feel like any of the ISTps around, more energy, more E stuff.
    I have always thought of Cracka as ESTJ and still do.
    Now that I know I am ESFJ all the more so.
    "Arnie is strong, rightfully angry and wants to kill somebody."
    martin_g_karlsson


  27. #27

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,101
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by CuriousSoul
    Quote Originally Posted by dee

    cracka is one. i think. he just feels so much as an ESTj i know who i think is ESTj because he talks always about Te stuff and Si stuff, is logical, and is not an SLI. he also looks like an ESTj (mix of al pacino and van damme). if you read cracka on the forum, he always talks of Te, is very comfy (Si), but does not feel like any of the ISTps around, more energy, more E stuff.
    I have always thought of Cracka as ESTJ and still do.
    Now that I know I am ESFJ all the more so.
    lol, I felt this same type of thing when UDP said he is an estj... I see us as so different that I can't accept being the same type as him, making me think I'm way more of an ESFJ than I already had. Not meaning this in a bad way, just that we're sooo different if I compare myself to him.

  28. #28
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,169
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aut0
    My fault you didn't accuse everyone of being a loser, you just accused me of being a loser, considering if LSE is my type than I must be some half-wit that mistakingly figured out how to use the interwebs.
    That is completely untrue and unjustified. I have much respect for LSEs.

    Quote Originally Posted by aut0
    Sorry, I'm allergic to threads over 90 pages. You = ISTJ, but I don't even think I'm going to go beyond this, when I imagine a conversation with you I imagine talking to a brick wall, or see a dog chasing its tail.
    As I've explained, LSI is certainly a possibility. However, the descriptions don't fit me, and nor does the IJ temperament.

  29. #29
    aka Slacker Slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North Korea
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    8,819
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You lack imagination. There could be millions of reasons why different people would choose to read about socionics.
    It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
    -Mark Twain


    You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.

  30. #30
    Éminence grise mikemex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Third Planet
    TIM
    IEE-Ne
    Posts
    1,631
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: A Declaration

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    1. There are no LSEs on this forum - they would find personality theories far from interesting. They are doers, not thinkers. They would find socionics to be a waste of time.
    Although I do agree with your statement that LSE are generally not interested, you're going too far with stereotypes.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    2. The only SLEs on this forum are those who joke around and arouse arguments and laughter in people. No SLE would drag out an extended personality theory in writing, carefully and methodically.
    There have been plenty of SLE scientists, mostly in areas close to engineering. A good example was Von Braun.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    - Those who are interested in the intertype relationship aspect of socionics (who are, primarily and surprisingly, not SFs but NFs). They are the ones who come up with ideas about why relationships work, how their own relationships correspond to socionics etc.
    - Those who are interested in the theory of socionics i.e. NTs/Researchers. They are the ones who translate all the articles, the ones who come up with new theories and ideas about socionics and how they logically fit into the existing system.
    According to your definition I'm NT. I'm far more interested in finding out how the mind works than anything else.
    [] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)

    You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life.
    - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.

  31. #31
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aut0
    My fault you didn't accuse everyone of being a loser, you just accused me of being a loser, considering if LSE is my type than I must be some half-wit that mistakingly figured out how to use the interwebs.
    What made you choose LSE over SLE for yourself? I mean perhaps you are the SLE and Ezra is the LSE in the end.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •