Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt

[liveandletlive]

I'm like 99% sure that Angelina is ENTj but what is Brad Pitt? Any other ideas about Angelina?

[Ezra]

http://www.socionics.us/celebrities/lie.shtml

[FDG]

I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.

[Suomea]

I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.

That's definitely my guess right now.... Jolie being the SLI.

[Ms. Kensington]

Personally I think ISTp/ESTp but I could see ISTp/ENTj. Yeah I do think they could have a contrary relationship.

[liveandletlive]

i don't know why but i thought angelina was ENTj and brad was ISFp- i didn't get a big T vibe from him... he seemed a little slow and smiley

[XoX]

Jolie has been typed ISTp as long as I remember. Only other type I have seen really is INFp. About Pitt...I have seen types from ENTj to ESTp to ENFp to ISTp and probably more. I have no strong personal opinion as I only know them from movies and VI but imho Jolie seems the introvert and Brad the extrovert. Jolie also seems at least decent with Si. Hard to say anything for sure based on so little evidence.

[liveandletlive]

ENTjs often have full lips and a characteristic salesman like smile. Their bone structures normally give them their square shape figures. Their faces too are often square in shape and the facial structure itself often has many small details. Their eyes are constantly darting about rarely remaining on one object for any period of time. ENTjs typically tend to have a bouncing gait. The more hyperactive they are the more noticeable this becomes.

This is sooo Angelina. C'mon someone try to fight me!

[Creepy-bg]

VI = not at all foolproof

[Ezra]

I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.

That's definitely my guess right now.... Jolie being the SLI.

Despite the fact that Jolie has been cited as a 4w3?

[Ezra]

I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.

Why is that good? They're Supervision partners.

[liveandletlive]

haha i don't listen to what anyone thinks and seeing as VI is somewhat subjective it's going to be very hard for me to be able to just accept it unless its painstakingly obviously. I'll try to look for what you guys said again but I just keep seeing LIE

[Ezra]

You're right - VI is useless when it's used on its own. But with countless interviews and descriptions of celebrities, it's very easy to see types. No one should claim that Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt is not a certain type just because they don't 'look' like that type, nor should one claim that they are a certain type because they look as if they could be.

[jessica129]

Brad Pitt is too out there to be an S of any sort.

[FDG]

I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.

Why is that good? They're Supervision partners.

Because practice is better than the theory; basically, I've seen good relationships (friends) between that specific supervision pair.

[implied]

everytime i look at the v.i. sketch on socionics.org for SLI the angelina jolie resemblance is really striking.



that kills me.

but i suppose ENTj has a similarish look.




i think ashton once called this the "leaky Fi eyes" look, hah.

[astralsilky]

everytime i look at the v.i. sketch on socionics.org for SLI the angelina jolie resemblance is really striking.



that kills me.

but i suppose ENTj has a similarish look.




i think ashton once called this the "leaky Fi eyes" look, hah.

Interesting sketches. How accurate have you found these in the past?

[Ezra]

I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

Personally, I'm extremely sceptical about VI, even with a description. It does help to identify in some ways what one is e.g. if someone is smiling on all their photos in a varied way, they're hardly going to be an ILI, but as a method in itself, it is practically useless.

[astralsilky]

I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

Personally, I'm extremely sceptical about VI, even with a description. It does help to identify in some ways what one is e.g. if someone is smiling on all their photos in a varied way, they're hardly going to be an ILI, but as a method in itself, it is practically useless.

But it can be useful in detecting contradictory typings so as to ensure consistent methodology/results. That's why I play with it -- among other reasons.

[Slacker]

I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

Personally, I'm extremely sceptical about VI, even with a description. It does help to identify in some ways what one is e.g. if someone is smiling on all their photos in a varied way, they're hardly going to be an ILI, but as a method in itself, it is practically useless.

I agree 100%. I think VI can maybe get people a rough general idea of some things, but more in the way a person chooses to present himself/herself than chin size or nose or anything like that.

[ScarlettLux]

Okay honestly ... where are you all getting the idea that Angelina is in any way an SLI? No way.

She is an out and out Beta type, clear from the interviews I've watched of her, good use of Fe. She is most likely an IEI.

Brad Pitt is most likely an ILE and they have an Illusionary relationship.

[Ezra]

Brad Pitt is most likely an ILE

I always found it hard to see him as an LIE.

[Park]

Okay honestly ... where are you all getting the idea that Angelina is in any way an SLI? No way.

She is an out and out Beta type, clear from the interviews I've watched of her, good use of Fe. She is most likely an IEI.

For the first time in my dwelling here, I agree with you.

[Hot Scalding Gayser]

God damnit it's annoying logging into this site. It takes like fucking 5 tries sometimes.

Anyhow, I think VI is as pretty accurate, or at least as accurate as it's gonna get. Because just think...people kinda act how they look, right? You can just kinda tell what their personality is not by their looks per se, but their 'disposition' more or less. Yeah I agree you can't tell how a person sounds just by looking them, or lots of other things, but if somebody has a rough, inherently confident demeanor you wouldn't say they were INFp or anything. It's not 100% foolproof no, but like....people do have certain auras if you will, that have their unique essence and nothing else. Your general hunches about a person are usually right, that's why we tend not to like or enjoy most people, since they don't surprise us and they pretty much read like a book (a boring one, at that) and do nothing for us.

Or maybe I'm speaking from a biased view of my own type. Whatever.

[Gilly]

IMO, EIE for him and IEI for her.

[implied]

I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

Personally, I'm extremely sceptical about VI, even with a description. It does help to identify in some ways what one is e.g. if someone is smiling on all their photos in a varied way, they're hardly going to be an ILI, but as a method in itself, it is practically useless.

erm, it isn't entirely useless. i actually quite enjoy the sketches and they do seem pretty accurate in my experiences, but it would probably be better to find some more accurate, reliable v.i. pictures before we all go praising v.i. as the only method. what i would heavily advise against is limiting yourself to only one method at the exclusion of other methods which could prove to be just as accurate.

[Ms. Kensington]

haha yeah i almost threw up when i saw some of those sketches because i see people i dont like in them

[implied]

haha yeah i almost threw up when i saw some of those sketches because i see people i dont like in them

lol, which ones?

[Gilly]

I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

You "heavily advise?" You're still probably the least experienced regular contributer to this board. What are you going to "advise" us based on? Your superior knowledge of professional cricket?

[Ezra]

Yes alright. Fuck off now you condescending piece of shit.

[Gilly]

Action -> Reaction

[Ezra]

Action -> Reaction

Well done. This is what I call a slap-in-the-face of an analysis.

[Kristiina]

I just wanted to mention that Angelina Jolie does not have PoLR and EJ temperament. No fucking way. ESTp is possible.

[Khamelion]

I hate celebrity type threads. I hate typing celebrities. I hate typing fictionaly characters. Which is all the are to us. We have no clues to their inner-world, all we have are their public statements which are designed to form images. Not to mention, Jolie is a master at media manipulation.


Don't be dumbasses.

[liveandletlive]

I hate celebrity type threads. I hate typing celebrities. I hate typing fictionaly characters. Which is all the are to us. We have no clues to their inner-world, all we have are their public statements which are designed to form images. Not to mention, Jolie is a master at media manipulation.


Don't be dumbasses.

good point. i just wish there was a better way to use VI that is common with everyone which is why celebrities theoretically should be great to use VI for on a forum such as this.

[Khamelion]

I hate celebrity type threads. I hate typing celebrities. I hate typing fictionaly characters. Which is all the are to us. We have no clues to their inner-world, all we have are their public statements which are designed to form images. Not to mention, Jolie is a master at media manipulation.


Don't be dumbasses.

good point. i just wish there was a better way to use VI that is common with everyone which is why celebrities theoretically should be great to use VI for on a forum such as this.

if VI works, i would agree
i don't really put any stock into VI =\

[Dionysius]

They seem duals.

ESI-Se for Angelina and LIE-Ni for Brad Pitt.

Brad is very spaced out... Ni. Easy-going, Positivist.
Angelina is in the moment, tenacious look = sensor, more likely Se. Negativist, depressive.

Jennifer Aniston seems IEE. Brad and her were Benefit relationship, which is very common. Obviously he left her (Childish) for an (Agressive) partner = Angelina.

[Amber]

Angelina is a cool version of EII; Pitt is probably LIE-Te (or LSE)

[Olly From Wally World]

Haha, another example of people forcing celeb couples into duality. And if Brad Pitt is not creative, I dunno who is. Not extroverted and not logical, at the least. I feel like the latter doesn't even need an explanation but I guess introverted subtype whatever could justify to some peeps of his social introversion. Enneagram-wise, so/sx 7w6, a good example of social 7 actually (maybe the 7 is why some think extrovert or base) and Angelina is sx 5w4 (although commonly, like many sx 5s especially with a 4 wing, typed as a four) and ESI fits her well. A real sx 5 ESI too, @Agni. No wonder you think she's cool.

[Ananke]

Angelina : SLI sx/sp
Brad is her dual