Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 103

Thread: Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt

  1. #1
    liveandletlive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,291
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt

    I'm like 99% sure that Angelina is ENTj but what is Brad Pitt? Any other ideas about Angelina?








    Last edited by silke; 08-22-2016 at 03:19 AM. Reason: updated links
    ESFp-Fi sub
    6w7 sx/so/sp

  2. #2
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  3. #3
    Resident WOP FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Basel
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,335
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.
    fatti non foste a viver come bruti ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza

  4. #4
    Suomea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    1,057
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.
    That's definitely my guess right now.... Jolie being the SLI.
    Suomea

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA.
    TIM
    INTj
    Posts
    4,498
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Personally I think ISTp/ESTp but I could see ISTp/ENTj. Yeah I do think they could have a contrary relationship.

  6. #6
    liveandletlive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,291
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i don't know why but i thought angelina was ENTj and brad was ISFp- i didn't get a big T vibe from him... he seemed a little slow and smiley
    ESFp-Fi sub
    6w7 sx/so/sp

  7. #7
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,410
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Jolie has been typed ISTp as long as I remember. Only other type I have seen really is INFp. About Pitt...I have seen types from ENTj to ESTp to ENFp to ISTp and probably more. I have no strong personal opinion as I only know them from movies and VI but imho Jolie seems the introvert and Brad the extrovert. Jolie also seems at least decent with Si. Hard to say anything for sure based on so little evidence.

  8. #8
    liveandletlive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,291
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENTjs often have full lips and a characteristic salesman like smile. Their bone structures normally give them their square shape figures. Their faces too are often square in shape and the facial structure itself often has many small details. Their eyes are constantly darting about rarely remaining on one object for any period of time. ENTjs typically tend to have a bouncing gait. The more hyperactive they are the more noticeable this becomes.

    This is sooo Angelina. C'mon someone try to fight me!
    ESFp-Fi sub
    6w7 sx/so/sp

  9. #9
    Creepy-bg

    Default

    VI = not at all foolproof

  10. #10
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Suomea
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.
    That's definitely my guess right now.... Jolie being the SLI.
    Despite the fact that Jolie has been cited as a 4w3?

  11. #11
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.
    Why is that good? They're Supervision partners.

  12. #12
    liveandletlive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,291
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    haha i don't listen to what anyone thinks and seeing as VI is somewhat subjective it's going to be very hard for me to be able to just accept it unless its painstakingly obviously. I'll try to look for what you guys said again but I just keep seeing LIE
    ESFp-Fi sub
    6w7 sx/so/sp

  13. #13
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You're right - VI is useless when it's used on its own. But with countless interviews and descriptions of celebrities, it's very easy to see types. No one should claim that Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt is not a certain type just because they don't 'look' like that type, nor should one claim that they are a certain type because they look as if they could be.

  14. #14
    jessica129's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10,109
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Brad Pitt is too out there to be an S of any sort.

  15. #15
    Resident WOP FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Basel
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,335
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    I can see now SLI and LIE, I've seen very good relations develop between the two types.
    Why is that good? They're Supervision partners.
    Because practice is better than the theory; basically, I've seen good relationships (friends) between that specific supervision pair.
    fatti non foste a viver come bruti ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza

  16. #16
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,753
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    everytime i look at the v.i. sketch on socionics.org for SLI the angelina jolie resemblance is really striking.



    that kills me.

    but i suppose ENTj has a similarish look.




    i think ashton once called this the "leaky Fi eyes" look, hah.

  17. #17

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    890
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    everytime i look at the v.i. sketch on socionics.org for SLI the angelina jolie resemblance is really striking.



    that kills me.

    but i suppose ENTj has a similarish look.




    i think ashton once called this the "leaky Fi eyes" look, hah.
    Interesting sketches. How accurate have you found these in the past?

  18. #18
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

    Personally, I'm extremely sceptical about VI, even with a description. It does help to identify in some ways what one is e.g. if someone is smiling on all their photos in a varied way, they're hardly going to be an ILI, but as a method in itself, it is practically useless.

  19. #19

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    890
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

    Personally, I'm extremely sceptical about VI, even with a description. It does help to identify in some ways what one is e.g. if someone is smiling on all their photos in a varied way, they're hardly going to be an ILI, but as a method in itself, it is practically useless.
    But it can be useful in detecting contradictory typings so as to ensure consistent methodology/results. That's why I play with it -- among other reasons.

  20. #20
    aka Slacker Slacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    North Korea
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    8,822
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

    Personally, I'm extremely sceptical about VI, even with a description. It does help to identify in some ways what one is e.g. if someone is smiling on all their photos in a varied way, they're hardly going to be an ILI, but as a method in itself, it is practically useless.
    I agree 100%. I think VI can maybe get people a rough general idea of some things, but more in the way a person chooses to present himself/herself than chin size or nose or anything like that.
    It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
    -Mark Twain


    You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.

  21. #21
    from toronto with love ScarlettLux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    TIM
    Beta sx 3w4;7w8
    Posts
    3,406
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Okay honestly ... where are you all getting the idea that Angelina is in any way an SLI? No way.

    She is an out and out Beta type, clear from the interviews I've watched of her, good use of Fe. She is most likely an IEI.

    Brad Pitt is most likely an ILE and they have an Illusionary relationship.


    Dress pretty, play dirty ღ
    Johari
    Nohari

  22. #22
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScarlettLux
    Brad Pitt is most likely an ILE
    I always found it hard to see him as an LIE.

  23. #23
    Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Beyond the blue horizon
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    13,079
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScarlettLux
    Okay honestly ... where are you all getting the idea that Angelina is in any way an SLI? No way.

    She is an out and out Beta type, clear from the interviews I've watched of her, good use of Fe. She is most likely an IEI.
    For the first time in my dwelling here, I agree with you.
    “Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    You've done yourself a huge favor developmentally by mustering the balls to do something really fucking scary... in about the most vulnerable situation possible.

  24. #24

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    9,991
    Mentioned
    218 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    God damnit it's annoying logging into this site. It takes like fucking 5 tries sometimes.

    Anyhow, I think VI is as pretty accurate, or at least as accurate as it's gonna get. Because just think...people kinda act how they look, right? You can just kinda tell what their personality is not by their looks per se, but their 'disposition' more or less. Yeah I agree you can't tell how a person sounds just by looking them, or lots of other things, but if somebody has a rough, inherently confident demeanor you wouldn't say they were INFp or anything. It's not 100% foolproof no, but like....people do have certain auras if you will, that have their unique essence and nothing else. Your general hunches about a person are usually right, that's why we tend not to like or enjoy most people, since they don't surprise us and they pretty much read like a book (a boring one, at that) and do nothing for us.

    Or maybe I'm speaking from a biased view of my own type. Whatever.

  25. #25
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,764
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IMO, EIE for him and IEI for her.

  26. #26
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,753
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.

    Personally, I'm extremely sceptical about VI, even with a description. It does help to identify in some ways what one is e.g. if someone is smiling on all their photos in a varied way, they're hardly going to be an ILI, but as a method in itself, it is practically useless.
    erm, it isn't entirely useless. i actually quite enjoy the sketches and they do seem pretty accurate in my experiences, but it would probably be better to find some more accurate, reliable v.i. pictures before we all go praising v.i. as the only method. what i would heavily advise against is limiting yourself to only one method at the exclusion of other methods which could prove to be just as accurate.

  27. #27

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA.
    TIM
    INTj
    Posts
    4,498
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    haha yeah i almost threw up when i saw some of those sketches because i see people i dont like in them

  28. #28
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,753
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ms. Kensington
    haha yeah i almost threw up when i saw some of those sketches because i see people i dont like in them
    lol, which ones?

  29. #29
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,764
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ezra
    I heavily advise against using these as any kind of typing method.
    You "heavily advise?" You're still probably the least experienced regular contributer to this board. What are you going to "advise" us based on? Your superior knowledge of professional cricket?

  30. #30
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes alright. Fuck off now you condescending piece of shit.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  31. #31
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,764
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Action -> Reaction

  32. #32
    ...been here longer than the fucking monarchy Ezra's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLE-Ti
    Posts
    9,182
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    Action -> Reaction
    Well done. This is what I call a slap-in-the-face of an analysis.
    Ideas don't determine who's right. Power determines who's right. And I have the power. So I'm right.

  33. #33
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,027
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just wanted to mention that Angelina Jolie does not have PoLR and EJ temperament. No fucking way. ESTp is possible.
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  34. #34
    Khamelion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    U.S.
    TIM
    SEE-Fi 6w7 sx/so
    Posts
    3,828
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I hate celebrity type threads. I hate typing celebrities. I hate typing fictionaly characters. Which is all the are to us. We have no clues to their inner-world, all we have are their public statements which are designed to form images. Not to mention, Jolie is a master at media manipulation.


    Don't be dumbasses.
    SEE Unknown Subtype
    6w7 sx/so



    [21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
    [21:29] hitta: and not dying
    .

  35. #35
    liveandletlive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,291
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Khamelion
    I hate celebrity type threads. I hate typing celebrities. I hate typing fictionaly characters. Which is all the are to us. We have no clues to their inner-world, all we have are their public statements which are designed to form images. Not to mention, Jolie is a master at media manipulation.


    Don't be dumbasses.
    good point. i just wish there was a better way to use VI that is common with everyone which is why celebrities theoretically should be great to use VI for on a forum such as this.
    ESFp-Fi sub
    6w7 sx/so/sp

  36. #36
    Khamelion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    U.S.
    TIM
    SEE-Fi 6w7 sx/so
    Posts
    3,828
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liveandletlive
    Quote Originally Posted by Khamelion
    I hate celebrity type threads. I hate typing celebrities. I hate typing fictionaly characters. Which is all the are to us. We have no clues to their inner-world, all we have are their public statements which are designed to form images. Not to mention, Jolie is a master at media manipulation.


    Don't be dumbasses.
    good point. i just wish there was a better way to use VI that is common with everyone which is why celebrities theoretically should be great to use VI for on a forum such as this.
    if VI works, i would agree
    i don't really put any stock into VI =\
    SEE Unknown Subtype
    6w7 sx/so



    [21:29] hitta: idealism is just the gap between the thought of death
    [21:29] hitta: and not dying
    .

  37. #37

    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    80
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    They seem duals.

    ESI-Se for Angelina and LIE-Ni for Brad Pitt.

    Brad is very spaced out... Ni. Easy-going, Positivist.
    Angelina is in the moment, tenacious look = sensor, more likely Se. Negativist, depressive.

    Jennifer Aniston seems IEE. Brad and her were Benefit relationship, which is very common. Obviously he left her (Childish) for an (Agressive) partner = Angelina.
    Last edited by Dionysius; 11-02-2014 at 05:58 PM.

  38. #38
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,521
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Angelina is a cool version of EII; Pitt is probably LIE-Te (or LSE)

  39. #39
    Olly From Wally World's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Wally World
    Posts
    822
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Haha, another example of people forcing celeb couples into duality. And if Brad Pitt is not creative, I dunno who is. Not extroverted and not logical, at the least. I feel like the latter doesn't even need an explanation but I guess introverted subtype whatever could justify to some peeps of his social introversion. Enneagram-wise, so/sx 7w6, a good example of social 7 actually (maybe the 7 is why some think extrovert or base) and Angelina is sx 5w4 (although commonly, like many sx 5s especially with a 4 wing, typed as a four) and ESI fits her well. A real sx 5 ESI too, @Agni. No wonder you think she's cool.

  40. #40

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    455
    Mentioned
    116 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Angelina : SLI sx/sp
    Brad is her dual

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •