Has anyone tried typing by non ego functions and relative pl

[Ms. Kensington]

acement?

I have found this useful. If not the first step in typing someone, maybe the second or third step.

[Jarno]

no the best way is to look at the ego functions, but sometimes I see people on this forum who type people using the POLR.

[Suomea]

acement?

I have found this useful. If not the first step in typing someone, maybe the second or third step.

Yeah..... I like using them all. Different ones at different times.

[PotatoSpirit]

Yeah other functions help me a lot.
I still have to figure out the 7th and 8th though. And 4th and 6th need some tweaking too (c:

[Phaedrus]

no the best way is to look at the ego functions, but sometimes I see people on this forum who type people using the POLR.

Yes, that is sometimes quite a reliable complementing method.

[Ezra]

no the best way is to look at the ego functions, but sometimes I see people on this forum who type people using the POLR.

It's much harder to type by PoLR, as although one might assume that a function that is weak is actually their PoLR when in reality, there is a weaker function, it is simply less evident. It's much easier to type by those functions which are clearly visible and strong/used by individuals.

[Expat]

It's not about choosing one over the other. It depends on what's more obvious in any particular situation.

[aestrivex]

It's not about choosing one over the other. It depends on what's more obvious in any particular situation.