# Thread: I wanna be analyzed Reininitacally

1. ## I wanna be analyzed Reininitacally...

I guess it's just another way to help interpret type. And I don't think I'm gonna get all the dichotomies right for me, which is what I need help with/on.
You know how some people put three traits together and describe it, like against three others, that's what I wanna try on me. But I don't know how they do it...

Using these definitions - http://the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8991
Dichotomies :

High Agreeableness:
Merry
Process

Mid Agreeableness:
Calculating
Construct-Creating
Obstinate
Judicious
Strategist
Positive
Democracy

Low Agreeableness:
Dynamic

2. If I put each dichotomy at the extreme on the Reinin Calculator, you get:

22% - ESFJ
12% - ENTP
12% - ENFJ
12% - ESFP
10% - INTJ
10% - ISTP
5% - INFJ
5% - ISFP
4% - INTP
2% - ESTJ
2% - INFP
0% - ENTJ
0% - ESTP
0% - ISTJ

But if I put your top two ones on '5', the medium ones on '4' and leave the other two in the middle...you get much the same .

14% - ESFJ
13% - ENTP
10% - ENFJ
10% - ESFP
10% - INFJ
9% - INTJ
9% - ISFP
6% - INTP
6% - ISTJ
4% - ESTP
3% - ISTP
2% - ESTJ
2% - INFP
1% - ENTJ
1% - ENFP
0% - ISFJ

3. ## Re: I wanna be analyzed Reininitacally...

Originally Posted by ThePeddler
I guess it's just another way to help interpret type. And I don't think I'm gonna get all the dichotomies right for me, which is what I need help with/on.
You know how some people put three traits together and describe it, like against three others, that's what I wanna try on me. But I don't know how they do it...

Using these definitions - http://the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8991
Dichotomies :

High Agreeableness:
Merry
Process

Mid Agreeableness:
Calculating
Construct-Creating
Obstinate
Judicious
Strategist
Positive
Democracy

Low Agreeableness:
Dynamic
So... You start off with a couple of negativist assertions. Combination of:Negativist-taciturn.
You immediately follow with a positive narratorial sentence with 'result' dichotomy tagged on as well. Changing to combination of positivist-narrator: Rational type. You dig for help in the performance of others and express interest in a phenomenon of some personal worth. You're asking for a fish, not to be taught fishin'. Strategist and intuitive. So now we know the post was written by EJ-Ni.
So you're probably off in 'judicious' and 'calculating' but that's not particularly bad. Particularly the 'Calculating' dichotomy is badly described everywhere.
But on the basis of this post I wouldn't call you ENTj but ENFj so I say you're mistaken about democracy and positivism as well. 'Democracy' is another serial offender of being badly described.

And that's how someone is typed dichotomically with all the normal caveats that perhaps what you did for a minute when writing about yourself in a post isn't perhaps the whole and complete destiny of the rest of your life.

4. ## Re: I wanna be analyzed Reininitacally...

Originally Posted by Smilingeyes
Originally Posted by ThePeddler
I guess it's just another way to help interpret type. And I don't think I'm gonna get all the dichotomies right for me, which is what I need help with/on.
You know how some people put three traits together and describe it, like against three others, that's what I wanna try on me. But I don't know how they do it...

Using these definitions - http://the16types.info/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8991
Dichotomies :

High Agreeableness:
Merry
Process

Mid Agreeableness:
Calculating
Construct-Creating
Obstinate
Judicious
Strategist
Positive
Democracy

Low Agreeableness:
Dynamic
So... You start off with a couple of negativist assertions. Combination of:Negativist-taciturn.
You immediately follow with a positive narratorial sentence with 'result' dichotomy tagged on as well. Changing to combination of positivist-narrator: Rational type. You dig for help in the performance of others and express interest in a phenomenon of some personal worth. You're asking for a fish, not to be taught fishin'. Strategist and intuitive. So now we know the post was written by EJ-Ni.
So you're probably off in 'judicious' and 'calculating' but that's not particularly bad. Particularly the 'Calculating' dichotomy is badly described everywhere.
But on the basis of this post I wouldn't call you ENTj but ENFj so I say you're mistaken about democracy and positivism as well. 'Democracy' is another serial offender of being badly described.

And that's how someone is typed dichotomically with all the normal caveats that perhaps what you did for a minute when writing about yourself in a post isn't perhaps the whole and complete destiny of the rest of your life.
Thanks man. Cool. I've been repeatedly typed as ENFj, but I just don't know. It's not that the type doesn't describe me, because it mostly does. In fact, I'm most likely an ExFx type..at least I think...And of the four ExFx types, ENFj and ENFp would probably be the best fit...

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•