-
-
Last edited by Dee; 02-26-2009 at 02:25 AM.
Are you trying to make a joke or something?
Or are you actually taking this seriously.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Socionics + cold + vodka = this test.
The problem is that you have to have an accurate understanding of each of these types and have accurately typed people you've known irl in order to have valid results. For most people (especially people who don't know their own type or at least quadra values), this is not the case.
this should be moved to anything goes to avoid confusion
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
umm wtf???
How is the testing mechanism supposed to work??
PoLR
Suggestive Function
Regular Double-shot Espresso Subtype
Just because I'm a thinking type doesn't mean I'm not an idiot.
The idea is that you should prefer types from your own quadra. You choose the type you like better from each pair and then add up how many types from each quadra you chose ("sum kuadraz types belong to"). That's all there is to it.
Originally Posted by Joy
The idea is that you should prefer types from your own quadra. You choose the type you like better from each pair and then add up how many types from each quadra you chose ("sum kuadraz types belong to"). That's all there is to it.
how comprehensive. it all makes sense now.
Okay. :wink:
enfj, infj, intj, intp, enfp, isfp, estp, esfj, isfp, intj, entj, enfp, isfj, enfj, infj, enfp, infp, estp, infj, infp, enfj
alpha=5
beta=7
delta=6
gamma=3
I don't know how accurate this test is but for me it shows a clear preference of Fi>Fe and suggests Gamma>Delta. I like the test very much. I wish people would participate so we could see whether the results show a pattern. (I couldn't choose between INTj and INFj which is why there is the 0,5 thingy).
Alpha:
1,5
Beta:
4
Gamma:
8
Delta:
7,5
Re: a quadra test
Gamma - 8
Delta - 7
Beta - 4
Strikingly similar to XoX's.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I don't understand the point of the test, for the reason Joy mentioned. Perhaps it serves to cross-check whether your self-typings and your "favorite types" are consistant with socionics. If you think you're an Alpha and you got far more points for Gamma than Alpha, for instance, then you have these possibilities:
1) You're not Alpha.
2) You don't understand the types.
3) Socionics is bunk generally.
4) A mix of the above.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Re: a quadra test
That's pretty cool.
Re: a quadra test
No, no. That's AWESOME. Repeat with me! Awesome!That's pretty cool.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
That's funny.
Re: a quadra test
Alpha 7
Beta 5
Gamma 5
Delta 4
Re: a quadra test
No, no. That's AWESOME. Repeat with me! Awesome!That's pretty cool.
(I hired a random
Alpha- 10
Beta- 2
Gamma- 4
Delta- 7
Suomea
The first time I did it, I got:
Alpha 7
Beta 5
Gamma 5
Delta 4
And I decided it wasn't reflective of my quadra. I am not Alpha. And the second time:
Alpha 7
Beta 5
Gamma 8
Delta 4
Gamma. How interesting. I'm going to do a lot more research into LIE, because I am seriously considering it as a potential type.
Alpha: 12
Beta: 6
Gamma: 0
Delta: 6
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
What is that supposed to mean?
Anyone truly understands descriptions and can accurately type people they know irl does not need a test like this to determine their quadra values.
Obviously my answers upset her.What is that supposed to mean?
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
it went, delta, gamma (near tie,) beta, alpha
so i suppose it's fairly correct!
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
This isn't about need.... it's about experimentation. I don't think this test was planned to be used out in the real world to establish type or quadra...... it's just a mind game to get you to think. At least that's the way I took it.
Suomea
LOL
haha..... yeah what Joy said.
Suomea
I'm with Expat on this one. He convinced me:Anyone truly understands descriptions and can accurately type people they know irl does not need a test like this to determine their quadra values.
Joy, if you were referring to functions when you said 'descriptions', I apologise. If not, take this on board.If you take any type - say, ESE.
And if you understand precisely, functionally, why the ESE is the LII's dual and the ILI's conflictor - why the ESE cravesand loathes
That post is totally irrelevant to the context of what I said.
I see your point as all-encompassing.
Yeah... it's like asking someone if they prefer pickles or olives when they don't even know what pickles or olives are.
And if they HAVE tried both pickles and olives and know what they are, they won't need a photo (or description) of each of them to decide which one they like better.
Right, okay, I get you now. I failed to see that.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote