100% INTj. I feel a lot of similarities between him and myself.
Some funny anecdotes here: http://www.dirac.ch/PaulDirac.html
-This is an interesting story about Ti becoming too complacent with itself. Dirac was so assured of his own correctness that he couldn't see the value of another person's theory.
Yes, I agree. Totally INTj.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
he v.i.'s quite perfectly as INTj IMO. background info fits as well.
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
saw equation, expecting gamma,.... nope.
eh hehOriginally Posted by Ms. Kensington