1) Ti or Te doesn't define your perception of reality, it determines your response to the reality you have defined.Originally Posted by Phaedrus
2) Ne defines reality in a manner that's "objective" and independant of the observer, whereas Ni does not.
Ni and Te working together are about making quick, concrete decisions, based on a subjective and nebulous view of what is real and unreal. Te gives a way to decide when there is enough concrete evidence, but choosing between options that are not well-defined already is impossible. Instead, Ni is often used to downplay the objective nature of the situation until coming to a subjective conclusion is rendered superfluous.
I don't think either type is inherently more objective or subjective. Both have both sides, emphasized in different ways. Static sees the choices we make as subjective responses to an objectively defined reality. Dynamic sees subjective aspects of reality, which are changable, reacting to the decisions we make using objective criterion.
The philosophy of dualism (dividing the universe into strictly supernatural and natural components) is Ni/Te in my opinion. It is an admission of defeat in the arena of observing reality objectively, and a judgment that the subtler aspects of reality are not something we can pick apart and explain logically.