Originally Posted by
PPOD
My boyfriend, whos work has been compared to such chido guys a Calvino and Nabokov had your post read to him and he giggled. Hard.
Do you not think that HP is filled religious subtext? They are. Of a new sort, new agey stuff.
While I'm flattered I was able to make your slutty effeminate boyfriend "giggle" as you put it, you need to reread what I wrote
before you and you potentially nonexistent boyfriend share a snide moment of ******ry.
I did not say, nor did I imply, that Rowling's books lack subtext. I said that she keeps the characters, dialogue, and plot at the forefront of her stories, with things like religious subtext relegated to a secondary level. This not only makes the books more entertaining, (unless you typically read Calvino or Nabokov, whose works your boyfriend's has been compared to) but also more successful.
Be a doll and tell Mr Giggles I said hi, slut.