Socionics and Big Five - post your results

[mikemex]

Hi. It would be interesting to know how people scores in Big Five. You can take the test here.

My results:

SLUEI
sloan+ xxue|I|
primary Inquisitive; S(52%)L(52%)U(60%)E(54%)I(82%)

I'm introvert/extrovert and calm/limbic ambivert. Probably ego-centrical/accomodating too.

Dominant Inquisitive:

more interested in intellectual pursuits than relationships or family, detaches to analyze factors from multiple perspectives, regularly uses ideas and tools to transform understanding, enjoys playing with random interconnections between ideas and patterns, would describe self as a nerd in high school, likes science fiction, introspective, good at fixing things, more comfortable around adults as a child, feels both special and defective, knows the darkside of life well, is not bothered by going long periods without speaking with people, more intellectual than sensual, can be bitter, problem solver, relies on mind more than on others, driven by curiousity, feels best when working, minimalist

Blue: not always.
Bold: 100%.

According to the approximate correlation table, I'm more similar to jungian ENTP/INTP than ENFP.

Results so far:

Mikemex (ENFp/ENTP):			sloan SLUEI; sloan+ xxue|I|; primary Inquisitive; S(52%)L(52%)U(60%)E(54%)I(82%)
Gilly (ENTp/ENTP):			sloan SLUEI; sloan+ |S|luei; primary Social; S(68%)L(54%)U(64%)E(58%)I(64%)
-------->(ENFP)				sloan SCUAI; sloan+ SCUA|I|; primary Inquisitive;
-------->(ENTP)				sloan SCUEI; sloan+ ScUe|I|; primary Inquisitive; S(80%)C(62%)U(76%)E(54%)I(88%) 
XoX (ENFp/ENTP):			sloan SLUEI; sloan+ slu|E|i; primary Egocentric; S(56%)L(58%)U(64%)E(74%)I(58%)
Discjoe (ENTp, ENTP):			sloan SLUEI; sloan+ sLUe|I|; primary Intuisitive; S(53%)L(64%)U(64%)E(57%)I(76%)

Herzy (ESTp/ENTP):			sloan SCUEI; sloan+ sc|U|EI; primary Unstructured; S(63%)C(63%)U(80%)E(70%)I(66%)
Ashton (ENTj/ENTP):			sloan SCUEI; sloan+ SUC|E|I; primary Egocentric; S(80%)C(80%)U(86%)E(90%)I(84%)

Expat (ENTj/ENTJ):			sloan SCOEI; sloan+ scOe|I|; primary Inquisitive; S(56%)C(60%)O(70%)E(60%)I(86%)

Mea (ENFp/ENFP):			sloan SCUAI; sloan+ S|C|UAI; primary Calm; S(72%)C(78%)U(74%)A(68%)I(70%)
Ms. Kensington (INTj/ENFP):		sloan SCUAI; sloan+ scUa|I|; primary Inquisitive;

FDG (ESTp/ESTP):			sloan SCUEN; sloan+ |S|CUen; primary Social; S(99%)C(90%)U(70%)E(60%)N(50%)
-------->(ENTJ)				sloan SCOEI; sloan+ |S|CoxI; primary Social;

Joy (INTj/ENTJ):			sloan SLOEI; sloan+ slo|E|i; primary Egocentric; S(62%)L(60%)O(54%)E(74%)I(62%)

Diamond8 (ENTp/ENFJ):			sloan SLOAI; sloan+ |S|loaI; primary Social; S(84%)L(62%)O(56%)A(54%)I(70%)
-------->(ENTJ)				sloan SCOEI; sloan+ |S|xoeI; primary Social; S(80%)C(53%)O(60%)E(54%)I(73%)
-------->(ENTJ)				sloan SLOEI; sloan+ |S|LoeI; primary Social; S(73%)L(67%)O(56%)E(56%)I(70%)

Slacker Mom (ENFp/ESFP):		sloan SLUAN;

Implied (INTp/INTJ):			sloan RLOEI; sloan+ rlO|E|i; primary Egocentric;
Oyburger (INTj/INTJ):			sloan RLOEI; sloan+ |R|lOEI; primary Reserved; R(84%)L(62%)O(76%)E(76%)I(78%)
BLauritson (INTp/INTJ):			sloan RLOEI; sloan+ xxoe|i|; primary Inquisitive; R(50%)L(52%)O(62%)E(60%)I(66%)
Artemis (INFp/INTJ):			sloan RLOEI; sloan+ x|L|OEi; primary Limbic; R(50%)L(90%)O(76%)E(90%)I(56%)

Posablethumb (ENTp/INTP):		sloan RLUEI; sloan+ rl|U|eI; primary Unstructured; R(54%)L(56%)U(88%)E(62%)I(70%)
Typhon (INTp/INTP):			sloan RLUEI; sloan+ x|L|uEi; primary Limbic; R(52%)L(76%)U(56%)E(70%)I(66%)
Misutii (INFp/INTP):			sloan RLUEI;

Reyn_til_runa (INTp/INTP):		sloan RCUEI; sloan+ rcUe|I|; primary Inquisitive;
Niffweed17 (INTp/INTP):			sloan RCUEI; sloan+ Rcu|E|i; primary Egocentric; R(82%)C(56%)U(54%)E(90%)I(80%)
Implied (INTp/INTP):			sloan RCUEI; sloan+ r|c|xei; primary Calm; R(62%)C(64%)U(52%)E(58%)I(64%)
Thunder/Isha (INTp/INTP):		sloan RCUEI;
MysticSonic (INTj/INTP):		sloan RCUEI; sloan+ RC|U|eI; primary Inquisitive; R(74%)C(70%)U(77%)E(60%)I(86%)
Heimdallr (INTj/INTP):			sloan RCUEI; sloan+ RCUe|I|; primary Inquisitive; R(77%)C(76%)U(74%)E(57%)I(86%)

VatesSaeculum (INFp/INFP):		sloan RCUAI; sloan+ |R|cuaI; primary Reserved; R(80%)C(64%)U(64%)A(64%)I(74%)
Trey (ENTp/INFP):			sloan RCUAI; sloan+ RCUA|I|; primary Inquisitive; R(80%)C(70%)U(64%)A(73%)I(83%)

April (INFj/INFJ):			sloan RCOAI; sloan+ |R|CoaI; prtimary Reserved;

Diana (ISFj/INTJ):			sloan RCOEI; sloan+ Rco|E|i; primary Egocentric; R(70%)C(58%)O(54%)E(70%)I(60%)
Snegledmaca (INFp/INTJ):		sloan RCOEI; sloan+ rCo|E|i; primary Egocentric; R(66%)C(86%)O(64%)E(86%)I(64%)
Thehotelambush (INTj/INTJ):		sloan RCOEI; sloan+ RCoE|I|; primary Inquisitive; R(80%)C(78%)O(64%)E(88%)I(90%)
Subterranean (INTJ):			sloan RCOEI; sloan+ |R|coeI; primary Reserved; R(78%)C(62%)O(60%)E(56%)I(68%)
Soggy-flakes (INTj/INTJ):		sloan RCOEI; sloan+ [R]xOeI; primary Reserved; R(78%)C(52%)O(78%)E(54%)I(62%)
Warrior-librarian (INTj)/INTJ):		sloan RCOEI; sloan+ Rx|O|ei; primary Organized; R(74%)C(53%)O(80%)E(57%)I(56%)

Enjio (ISTp/ISTJ):			sloan RCOEN; sloan+ |R|coEn; primary Reserved R(72%)C(56%)O(54%)E(71%)N(58%)

[Expat]

sloan SCOEI; sloan+ scOe|I|; primary Inquisitive; S(56%)C(60%)O(70%)E(60%)I(86%)

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were high which suggests you are overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were very high which suggests you are extremely intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

SCOEI

not afraid of doing the wrong thing, speaks up regardless of consequences, not filled with doubt, more dominant than submissive, not afraid to draw attention to self, self confident, does not back down when threatened, decisive, feels you have to be tough on people to get things done, not easily hurt, worry free, not easily intimidated, not concerned with failure when trying something new, aggressive, fearless, controlling, domineering, ambivalent about the suffering of strangers, not easily discouraged, out for own personal gain, comfortable in unfamiliar situations, unconcerned with the misfortunes of strangers, likes giving speeches, not easily moved to tears, manipulative, unapologetic, knows where life is going, narcissistic, exacting in their work, does not second guess self, untouched by other people's feelings, the first to act, level emotions, never at a loss for words, opinionated, demanding, goes after what they want, believes in a logical answer for everything, not very religious, show off, calm in crisis

[machintruc]

Hi. It would be interesting to know how people scores in Big Five. You can take the test here.

My results:

SLUEI
sloan+ xxue|I|
primary Inquisitive; S(52%)L(52%)U(60%)E(54%)I(82%)

I'm introvert/extrovert and calm/limbic ambivert. Probably ego-centrical/accomodating too.

This is not Big Five, but Global Five.

Big Five (not to be confused with Global Five and FFM) is a dichotomous model which has those factors :

- Surgency (supposed to correlate with Extrotimness)
- Agreeableness (supposed to correlate with Ethics)
- Conscientiousness (supposed to correlate with Judgement)
- Emotional Stability
- Intellect (supposed to correlate with Intuition)

And is not really an homeostatic thing, like socionics. Those "personnality tests" are actually either funny enthusiastic questionnaires or professional tools for cognitive discrimination. i.e. although it's illegal in most developed countries to refuse to employ somebody because he's Black, it's not illegal to refuse to employ somebody because he's not ENFJ or something. (I know that's not exactly what we were talking about)

http://www.personalityresearch.org/bigfive.html

Ambiverts don't exist. This is an illusion because classical definition of "extroversion" is more relevant to than . Classical definition of "introversion", in contrast, is more relevant to than .

You can make this correlation to the Surgency factor :

.9 .8 .7 .6 .4 .3 .2 .1

In socionics, there are two kinds of people :

1. Extrotims, which display 62% of extroversion and 38% of introversion
2. Introtims, which display 62% of introversion and 38% of extroversion

This is due to the differentiation of the psyche, which is a natural thing. If Introtims were 90% or 100%, they couldn't be able to take initiative or get in action.

But if psyche was not differentiated (i.e. symmetrically developing), nobody could specialise himself to handling some aspects of information more than others.

[mikemex]

Well, just a quick comment:

1.- Global Five and Big Five are like flavors of the same thing. The same happens to socionics and other typologies.
2.- I don't see a conflict between both systems (XXX Five and Socionics). Think about it like socionics tells you how your mind processes information and XXX Five how your character is. Say, one tells you how the neurons are arranged and the other how sensible is the system to certain neurochemicals and such.
3.- It's mere curiosity. I just want to have a sample for analysis.

[Gilly]

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, improvised, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you are moderately relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Global 5: sloan SLUEI; sloan+ |S|luei; primary Social; S(68%)L(54%)U(64%)E(58%)I(64%)

I always used to test as primary Inquisitive, but I guess I've changed since then. If I had to pick, I'd say I'm more likely a primary Unstructured.

prone to addiction, often late, does not think things work out for the best, impatient, discontent, negative, opinionated, acts without thinking, preoccupied with self, easily frustrated, not that interested in others, act at the expense of others, becomes aggressive when they feel hurt, acts wild and crazy, frustrated and angry when people don't live up to expectations, slow to forgive, takes charge, does not behave in way that is acceptable to society, pessimistic, agnostic/atheistic tendencies, not usually happy, not calm in crisis, does not accomplish work on time, spontaneous, not on good terms with everyone, demanding, misbehaved, improper, avoids responsibilities, not willing to let things rest, acts out frustrations on others, has a need to maintain high levels of excitement, rarely prepared, often bored while working, aggressive, asks questions nobody else does, hard to reason with, likes to be the center of attention, acts without planning, retaliatory, asks many questions, quick to correct others, more pleasure seeking than responsible, not hard working, disorganized, loses things, unable to control cravings

Wow...a little harsh/exaggerated, to say the least, but I guess a bit of it (bolded) describes me pretty accurately.

Overall, not a really reliable instrument or theory, IMO.

[Mea]

I've taken this test before.
sloan SCUAI;
sloan+ S|C|UAI;
primary Calm;
S(72%)C(78%)U(74%)A(68%)I(70%)

[FDG]

i usually get

99 extraversion
40 agreeableness
30 orderliness
90 emotional stability
50 inquisivness

[Blaze]

Global 5: sloan SLOAI; sloan+ |S|loaI; primary Social; S(84%)L(62%)O(56%)A(54%)I(70%)

[machintruc]

Well, just a quick comment:

1.- Global Five and Big Five are like flavors of the same thing. The same happens to socionics and other typologies.
2.- I don't see a conflict between both systems (XXX Five and Socionics). Think about it like socionics tells you how your mind processes information and XXX Five how your character is. Say, one tells you how the neurons are arranged and the other how sensible is the system to certain neurochemicals and such.
3.- It's mere curiosity. I just want to have a sample for analysis.

Big Five and Global Five are just like VI... correlating but distant

[FDG]

99 extroversion? Damn, FDG

Well, I think it's correct

[Slacker]

SLUAN

often late, influenced more by others than self, easily frustrated, frequently driven to impress others, easily moved to tears, does not believe everything can be explained scientifically, fires back when someone hurts them, not analytical, easily distracted, does not always know what they are doing, easy to get to know, easily impressed, easily influenced, rarely prepared, not controlling, prone to jealousy, not bothered by disorder, low self confidence, acts without hesitation, not self reflective, thinks fun is the most important thing in life, worrying, easily hurt, spontaneous, tense, high maintenance, not detail oriented, unpredictable, prone to attachment, not interested in science, not afraid to draw attention to self, anxious, does not know why they do some things, not strict with self, inexplicably happy some of the time, attentive to appearances, underachiever, bases goals on inspiration rather than logic, will do a lot to avoid rejection, swayed by emotions, uses acts of kindness to get closer to people

Hmm that's pretty good.

Edit - I've now read a few of these and they all kind of sounded like me in a way, so I'm starting to question the value of this.

[machintruc]

99 extroversion? Damn, FDG

Well, I think it's correct

So how could you differentiate SEE and SLE when you typed yourself ?

[aestrivex]

repeated tests have found me to be Rcu|E|i. and, frankly, i couldn't care less about it.

[FDG]

99 extroversion? Damn, FDG

Well, I think it's correct

So how could you differentiate SEE and SLE when you typed yourself ?

I clearly don't have a Ti PoLR

[XoX]

Big Five:

Extroversion 56%
Orderliness 36%
Emotional Stability 42%
Accommodation 26%
Inquisitiveness 58%

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly flexible, random, improvised, and fun seeking at the expense of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were low which suggests you are overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense too often of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

Global 5: sloan SLUEI; sloan+ slu|E|i; primary Egocentric; S(56%)L(58%)U(64%)E(74%)I(58%)

Edit:
According to this page:
http://similarminds.com/global5/g5-jung.html

I would most likely be ENTp in MBTI.

[implied]

see sigline! oh, and my primary was egocentric.

[posablethumb]

Global 5: sloan RLUEI; sloan+ rl|U|eI; primary Unstructured; R(54%)L(56%)U(88%)E(62%)I(70%)

[oyburger]

Global 5: sloan RLOEI; sloan+ |R|lOEI; primary Reserved; R(84%)L(62%)O(76%)E(76%)I(78%)

If I recall correctly, this is what I got the last few times I took this.

[reyn_til_runa]

rcUe|I|

What is the difference between ultra helpful and helpful? Seems a bit weird that about 1/2 the questions are qualified by that one word.

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[snegledmaca]

Global 5: sloan RCOEI; sloan+ rCo|E|i; primary Egocentric; R(66%)C(86%)O(64%)E(86%)I(64%)


Don't remember the last scores.

[mikemex]

Don't remember the last scores.

And doesn't actually matter. It's just an explanation of the score. The important score is the one you posted. Thanks.

[Exodus]

R(80%)C(78%)O(64%)E(88%)I(90%) – primary Inquisitive
RCoE|I|

[BLauritson]

Well, I was going to type up some comments about my results, but the bastard font color drop-down box erased all the text I'd written, so fuck it, here's my results, I can't be bothered to re-type my comments:

Global 5: sloan RLOEI; sloan+ xxoe|i|; primary Inquisitive; X(50%)L(52%)O(62%)E(60%)I(66%)

Extroversion results were medium which suggests you are moderately talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you are moderately relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly selfish, uncooperative, and difficult at the expense of the well being of others.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately high which suggests you are intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

more interested in intellectual pursuits than relationships or family, detaches to analyze factors from multiple perspectives, regularly uses ideas and tools to transform understanding, enjoys playing with random interconnections between ideas and patterns, would describe self as a nerd in high school, likes science fiction, introspective, good at fixing things, more comfortable around adults as a child, feels both special and defective, knows the darkside of life well, is not bothered by going long periods without speaking with people, more intellectual than sensual, can be bitter, problem solver, relys on mind more than on others, driven by curiousity, feels best when working, minimalist

Jung/MBTI/Kiersey | Global 5
------------------+-------------
INTJ              | RCOEI, RLOEI

So in summary:

SLOAN: RLOEI; J/K/MBTI: INTJ; Socionics: INTp

[VatesSaeculum]

Global 5: sloan RCUAI; sloan+ |R|cuaI; primary Reserved; R(80%)C(64%)U(64%)A(64%)I(74%)

avoidant, often late, patient, rarely prepared, non-aggressive, slow to judge others, withdrawn, unconcerned with image, relaxed, avoids crowds, easy going, not demanding, low maintenance, unambitious, not domineering, private, thinks before acting, concerned with the feelings of others, not wild and crazy, not controlling, does not like to show anger, hard to offend, dislikes the spotlight, uninterested in leading, not competitive, overly nice, not physically affectionate with most people, not bothered by disorder, level emotions, does not second guess self, agnostic/atheistic tendencies, not picky about food, not relationship obsessed, unproductive, unimposing, plain in appearance, disorganized, loner, lower energy level, very curious, uninterested in prestige/fame, not superficial, likes difficult reading material, does not get worked up about most things, fearless, flexible, trusting, does not stick to plans, easily distracted, interested in science, unconcerned that people have trouble reading them, a good loser, modest, not swayed by emotions

Reserved-outsider, does not fit in most places, does not mind going days without speaking to people, does not like night life and crowds, not self expressive, spends more time in solitary activity than group activity, does not compete for the spotlight, fears getting involved with others, not seductive, dresses to avoid standing out, not impulsive, loner, female introverts tend not to like wearing makeup, does not enjoy leadership, not very sexual, more likely to be nerdy, prefers loose fitting clothing, inhibited, suspicious, tattoo averse, unmotivated, can't do anything when they don't fee good, has trouble speaking when emotional, dislikes compliments, desires security and support, does not like accepting help, more visual than verbal, does not want to be famous, likes science fiction, prefers to stick with things they know, not traditional

Yes indeed.

[Not A Communist Shill]

Global 5: sloan RCOEI; sloan+ |R|coeI; primary Reserved; R(78%)C(62%)O(60%)E(56%)I(68%)

withdrawn, not wild and crazy, private, loner, not relationship obsessed, not swayed by emotions, insensitive to the needs of others, unhelpful, interested in intellectual pursuits, avoidant, does not put the needs of others ahead of self, thinks before acting, very scientific, not upset by the misfortune of strangers, avoids small talk, values solitude, private, does not get worked up about most things, fearless, unaffected by the suffering of others, calm in crisis, not easily excited, won't do much to avoid rejection, not known for generosity, not easily confused, cold, not prone to complimenting others, dislikes most people but tries to get along to minimize hostility, hard to get to know, more dominant than submissive, not easily hurt, driven by reason, influenced more by self than others, rarely worried, hard to impress, not that interested in relationships, hard to influence, not concerned about failing when trying something new, self confident, knows why they do things, not easily moved to tears, not prone to jealousy, not guided by moods

Reserved
outsider, does not fit in most places, does not mind going days without speaking to people, does not like night life and crowds, not self expressive, spends more time in solitary activity than group activity, does not compete for the spotlight, fears getting involved with others, not seductive, dresses to avoid standing out, not impulsive, loner, female introverts tend not to like wearing makeup, does not enjoy leadership, not very sexual, more likely to be nerdy, prefers loose fitting clothing, inhibited, suspicious, tattoo averse, unmotivated, can't do anything when they don't fee good, has trouble speaking when emotional, dislikes compliments, desires security and support, does not like accepting help, more visual than verbal, does not want to be famous, likes science fiction, prefers to stick with things they know, not traditional

[Logos]

Global 5: sloan RCOEI; sloan+ Rcox|I|; primary Inquisitive; R(70%)C(64%)O(62%)X(50%)I(74%)

Extroversion results were low which suggests you are very reclusive, quiet, unassertive, and private.

Orderliness results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were moderately high which suggests you are relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.

[Gilly]

stuff

I thought your handle was VacuumSalesman at first glance.

[misutii]

R(68%)L(70%)U(72%)E(62%)I(72%)

[Quirk Satellite Div.]

Global 5: sloan SLUAI; sloan+ xlxx|I|; primary Inquisitive; S(52%)L(58%)X(50%)A(52%)I(76%)

I am 90% sure that if I take the test tomorrow, let's say, at 6:00 PM, I will get a completely different result. I don't trust typology systems that use simple testing algorithms to primarily determine the type. But disregarding the typology system, the main reason I am getting an odd result is probably because I didn't really strongly agree or strongly disagree with one trait or the other; just notice the amount of my results close to 50%. I can't when most of the questions are just adjectives. I will come back tomorrow and see how I do.

[olduser]

RCOAI
Global 5: sloan RCOAI; sloan+ Rc|O|ai; primary Organized; R(68%)C(66%)O(72%)A(54%)I(64%)

It's basically INxj.

[eunice]

Global 5: sloan RCUAI; sloan+ |r|cuai; primary Reserved; R(66%)C(62%)U(64%)A(54%)I(58%)

[raisonpure]

Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were very low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, improvised, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were moderately low which suggests you are worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were medium which suggests you are moderately kind natured, trusting, and helpful while still maintaining your own interests.

Inquisitiveness results were moderately low which suggests you are, at times, overly small minded, traditional, and conventional at the expense of intellectual curiousity, possibility, and progress.

Global 5: sloan SLUEN; sloan+ sl|U|xn; primary Unstructured; S(62%)L(62%)U(84%)E(52%)N(58%)

This is ridiculous. IMO, SLUEI > SLUAN and RLUEN > SLUAN > SLUEN.

[KSpin]

RCUE|I|

It's close, but looking at RCUAI, that seems more like me. I'm definitely not interested in fame... just being well-enough off not to worry about money.

[idealistichick]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||||||||| 66%
Orderliness |||||||||||||||||| 74%
Emotional Stability |||||| 26%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||||| 72%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||| 48%
Accuracy: - 5 hi 4 3 2 1 low
The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:



Extroversion results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were high which suggests you are overly organized, neat, structured and restrained at the expense too often of flexibility, variety, spontaneity, and fun.

Emotional Stability results were low which suggests you are very worrying, insecure, emotional, and anxious.

Accommodation results were high which suggests you are overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense too often of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were medium which suggests you are moderately intellectual, curious, and imaginative.

[Park]

|R| l u E i

[Elro]

RCUAI, C and A highest

[KSpin]

RCUAI, C and A highest

And what type are you, in Socionics?

[aestrivex]

RCUAI, C and A highest

And what type are you, in Socionics?

edit: he says he's SEI i think

[Suomea]

Big Five Test Results

Extroversion |||||||||||||||||| 72%
Orderliness |||||| 28%
Emotional Stability |||||||||||| 50%
Accommodation |||||||||||||||| 62%
Inquisitiveness |||||||||||||||||| 80%
Accuracy: - 5 hi 4 3 2 1 low
The Big Five is currently the most accepted personality model in the scientific community. The Big Five emerged from the work of multiple independent scientists/researchers starting in the 1950s who using different techniques obtained similar results. Those results were that there are five distinct personality traits/dimensions. Here are your results on each dimension:



Extroversion results were high which suggests you are overly talkative, outgoing, sociable and interacting at the expense too often of developing your own individual interests and internally based identity.

Orderliness results were low which suggests you are overly flexible, random, improvised, and fun seeking at the expense too often of structure, reliability, work ethic, and long term accomplishment.

Emotional Stability results were medium which suggests you are moderately relaxed, calm, secure, and optimistic.

Accommodation results were moderately high which suggests you are, at times, overly kind natured, trusting, and helpful at the expense of your own individual development (martyr complex).

Inquisitiveness results were high which suggests you are very intellectual, curious, imaginative but possibly not very practical.