Original article: http://socionic.ru/index.php/2010-10...07-24/2998--qq


Translator's notes

This article provides the theoretical explanation of the subtype profiles compiled by Meged and Ovcharov.

In summary, this article is stating that Dominant function subtype also emphasizes information that pertains to the Mobilizing function, while Creative function subtype will emphasize information that pertains to the Suggestive function. SLI-Si will have 'stronger' Si and Fi and 'weakened' Te ...

References:

- Socionics tests (scroll to bottom)
- Find your socionics temperament: IJ, IP, EJ, EP
- Type yourself by valued ...

System of DCNH Subtypes
Viktor Gulenko, 2006. подтипов: система DCNH
Original text: DCNH: System of DCNH Subtypes

1. The problem of intra-type differences

Why are people of one type so different? This question ...

[Translator's Note: This is part of a longer article on the DCNH subtypes by Vera Borisova, which can be found here. The following is a description of the four DCNH subtypes. I am still not certain of the translation of the words and phrases which are highlighted in red.]

1. Dominant





The brightest, most vivid subtype -- within the limits of type, and in general.

Most similar of all to his type's description. Nuance: the Dominant introvert is more extraverted (especially not in a socionics understanding, but in Eysenck’s understanding, i.e. lively, sociable, and outgoing), but still displays pronounced characteristic features of his type. If the normal introvert, upon getting tired of communicating, will just go "hide in a corner", the Dominant will drive everyone away and still be grumbling loudly, saying, "Everyone keeps walking around here!"

He is the most realized, especially in the socio-cultural sphere; I think that most famous people, i.e. well-known actors, writers, politicians, etc. fall into the Dominant subtype.
...

Compatible subtypes

(machine trans--further translation needed)
source: http://ru.laser.ru/authors/meged_ovcharov/85.htm


If you follow the principles of Jungian typology, the repression of the human behavior of psychological functions, opposite to the value of the leading features of his personality type, should affect the relationship of subtypes. Heavy-duty functions in the interaction of subtypes can produce compatibility effects, or conversely, discord in the relationship, the more pronounced the more unfavorable overall intertype relations (relations between the 16 th personality types).

The best compatibility is at the duals, if they are subtypes of enhanced non-opposed to each other (in regard to the information), a pair of functions, as intuition, logic, ethics, or sensory, as they are not antagonistic to each other. This ...