Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
I often get trash talked, mogged or dismissed for my Si fixations.. perhaps because it’s an immature element in me and it even less receives well..
Braingel Today, 04:46 AMYes, for the Ne replacing Se, this is me intuiting how it is for myself, relative to how the Ne and Se define in SCs
Braingel Today, 04:43 AMI would be mistaking my internal self as how I look outwardly, which I also have done a fuck ton. Heck, this even fits autism theory of mind deficit well..
Braingel Today, 04:42 AMBasically, static types who have an Se creative or role will not be able to understand very easily, that Gulenko’s way of writing that info and
Braingel Today, 03:59 AMThe whole “he expanded socionics” is a lack of understanding of Ne to begin with and is a surface stereotype of Ne. Both Se and Ne expand
Braingel Today, 03:42 AMHe does this in vast, confident detail, even says, “this is how we confidently identify”.. This is high dimensionality Se. Immense detail
Braingel Today, 03:33 AMThen even when it isn’t with that reason, it’s always with some other shallow, vague reason that doesn’t even relate to functions. Wvbry
Braingel Today, 03:19 AM
I'm in a conflict relationship!? (IEI + LSE)
@End
Lord Pixel Today, 05:21 AMmakes sense that attachment style would affect all relations. But I mean, I'm not sure this all stems from the postnatal care unit or