Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
I mean, if I’m very honest, people here are unlikely to offer accurate insights of your type, because they are using surface observing models, like
Braingel Yesterday, 11:50 PMAnother such LII is Sephiroth from FF7. He's actually the same archetype as Mr. Spock, and is the only such character present in the Millennial generation
HolyKnowing Yesterday, 10:45 PMSo far the only thing that seems okay with me being ESI is parts of Fe ignoring
However, I don't really get immersed in other people
how can you even compete with an autistic Ni base perfectionist like this one
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ac-pvfZli8Y
who
I was gonna add myself but the spreadsheet gatekeeper @DirectorAbbie has been MIA in for so long.
Someone should revive this, or make a
ESIs seem much bolder in imposing their morals, feelings and will compared to me, and more interested in and defending societal moral issues , the description
Squirrel Yesterday, 10:14 PMI would agree with that , especially if 4 Sides of mind theory is included with it , but I personally prefer Socionics, I'm not willing to study people
Squirrel Yesterday, 10:14 PMJohn Beebe is arguably more accurate than SCS for a very traumatized and unhealthy person. Their ignoring function isn’t neurotic, but as I was
Braingel Yesterday, 09:58 PMI noticed that while I was reading, actually I sometimes need to read the same description more than once in order to understand what's written more
Squirrel Yesterday, 09:53 PM
Thoughts about my type
I only understand scs by my intuition and fill-ins of it.. If you want a guess of what your true type is, look for a guy in the scs circle named Capitan..
Braingel Yesterday, 11:58 PM