Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
It's grasping more different factors within life. For example, with Ne it is gonna make more leaps and connections between different things. Se is more
youfloweryourfeast Today, 08:43 PMEh, I know but reading Aushra's schematics gives me a major headache. I'm not a computer. Really, even programmers do not do it even if they assign those
The Reality Denialist Today, 07:38 PMWhy I believe classical Aushura inspired models (not the direct classic itself that wasn’t complete) are better than other socio models:
The other dichotomies are given very little credence in this model. This is something to be aware of, that can also influence things. A dichotomy like
Braingel Today, 06:52 PMIn classical aushura influenced models, mental/vital, accepting/producing, and static/dynamic would be the most important. With mental versus vital being
Braingel Today, 06:50 PMYou should study mental versus vital, and some typings you deem as poor will make more sense.. Mental and vital dichotomy was always supposed be apart
Braingel Today, 06:48 PMThey really just made wild guesses back then, eh?
on a peaceful hiatus Today, 06:33 PMI have never seen you on the forum, so I’m going to have to gather things you’ve written that I feel are telling and analyze them.. I am going
Braingel Today, 06:31 PMWatch Unalive La Unalive. It's as innocent as Toulouse-Lautrec.
HolyKnowing Today, 06:20 PM
Why I don’t believe Si egos or sensors without Ti as a general rule of thumb make very good typists..
[MENTION=20703]Expansion[/MENTION] I recommend you watch Unalive La Unalive 2×.
HolyKnowing Today, 08:53 PM